Cha Ching! Cha Ching!

Today was a MOTION heard in Plymouth Court - simple really or so one thought.

The MOTION was to seek the court's insistence in deposing the owners of Route 44 Toyota.
After all, aren't they responsible for the ILLEGAL CREDIT INQUIRIES [among other things]?

Who is responsible for an ILLEGAL BUSINESS PRACTICE if not the owners?
Shouldn't I have a right to ask?

I was outside my vehicle in my LEMON COSTUME that seemed to get Attorney Viera pretty worked up, prompting a lecture from the judge about my attorney controlling her client.....well, there was an acknowledgement of those dastardly FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS!  [Attorney Viera seems to be the Nurse Ratched of sanity!]

[A reporter took pictures of the LEMON.]

After much discussion about little old LEMON HARASSING the multi-million dollar Route 44 Toyota dealership, the judge was curious if the LEMON LADY was present in the court.

The LEMON LADY stood, listened to the judge's lecture about a jury would not take kindly to a LEMON, the LEMON responded:

1. Route 44 Toyota is free to settle this matter as they choose

2. Beyond the LEMON, Route 44 Toyota ILLEGALLY requested the LEMON's credit report twice, the credit report of a friend [in violation of FCRA - Fair Credit Reporting Act] - don't I have a right to share that information?

3. It is highly likely that a jury would support my RIGHTS OF FREE SPEECH.


 
FOOTNOTE: A representative for Attorney Keith B. Rose's law firm in ALBANY, NY traveled to this event. Her SOLE comment to the court was to announce her name and that she represented Toyota U.S.A., successfully justifying BILLABLE HOURS toddling to and fro Albany, NY.

Anyone hear.....

????

This experience should serve to discredit ALL corporate claims of the high cost of litigation.

They've accomplished this by themselves rather than repairing my NEW CAR or settling the matter.