Saturday, June 4, 2016

This & that.....




 Bernie Sanders' Supporters shared a link.
Putin Orders The Release Of The Most Dangerous Email In World!

USANEWSFLASH.COM

Hillary Panicking….Putin Orders The Release Of The Most Dangerous Email In World!

A stunning report circulating in the Kremlin today released by the Security Council (SC) says that a little over 12 hours ago, President Putin ordered the release of a single Hillary Clinton email that is part of the tens-of-thousands of them currently held in the possession of Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR).
According to this report, President Putin’s action in ordering the release of this email was meant to solve the dispute between the Director of the Federal Security Service (FSBAlexander Bortnikov and Chairwoman of the Council of Federation (CoFValentina Matviyenko over the issue of releasing to the Western media these top secret and classified emails obtained by the SVR from the private, but unsecured, computer (email server) belonging to former US Secretary of State, and present American presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton.
Following our 6 May report, Kremlin War Erupts Over Release Of Top Secret Hillary Clinton Emails, about this internal conflict relating to Hillary Clinton’s emails that erupted in the highest echelons of Russia’s government, the US media has largely held its silence—with the exceptions being the widely read Gatewaypundit.com political blog who wrote about it in their articleREPORT: Hillary’s Emails Hacked by Russia – Kremlin Deciding Whether to Release 20,000 Stolen Emails and the Fox News Channel where one of that networks main shows, The Kelly File,discussed this crisis too.
Though this report doesn’t specifically state to whom President Putin ordered this single Hillary Clinton email released to, it doesn’t appear to be that hard to figure out as one hour later the international, non-profit, journalistic organization Wikileaks, that publishes secret information, news leak and classified media from anonymous sources, sent out a Twitter message containing this email under the headline Is this email the FBI’s star exhibit against Hillary Clinton (“H”)?(see email below)

The grave implications to Hillary Clinton in regards to this email, this report notes, is that it provides conclusive proof that she personally ordered top secret and other type classifications to be stripped from emails sent to her private unsecured computer server in violation of US law—and, also, directly contradicts what it says on her presidential campaign website: “Clinton only used her account for unclassified email. No information in Clinton’s emails was marked classified at the time she sent or received them.”
This report further notes that another Hillary Clinton statement on her campaign website that says: “Was it allowed? Yes. The laws, regulations, and State Department policy in place during her tenure permitted her to use a non-government email for work”, has, likewise, been exposed as being untrue by the US State Department’s Inspector General who last week said that not only wasn’t this allowed, he detailed how Jonathan Scott Gration, the former US Ambassador to Kenya, who ignored instructions in July 2011 not to use commercial email for government businesses, was forced to resign, in mid-2012, when then Secretary Clinton herself initiated disciplinary action against him, while at the same time she was doing the exact same thing, but keeping it secret.
Though this report doesn’t cite the American laws Hillary Clinton broke by her actions, many US media news sites do—with all of them agreeing that the most serious US laws violated by her were  Executive Order 13526-Classified National Security Information and 18 U.S.C Sec. 793(f)-Gathering, Transmitting or Losing Defense Information of the federal code that make it unlawful to send or store classified information on personal email.
With President Putin having now ordered the release of this damaging Hillary Clinton email proving once and for all that she, indeed, did break America’s laws, this report concludes, the next event to happen will be to see if the Obama regime enforces them against her—and as we had previously reported in our 13 May report titled Putin Warns Military Commanders: “If It’s Hillary Clinton, It’s War”, this is an issue that has grave implications for not only the US presidential race, but for the whole world too. 



http://usanewsflash.com/hillary-panicking-putin-orders-release-dangerous-email-world/

Something to consider!! THEY WERE SLIME THEN AND THEY ARE SLIME NOW!!







Hillary Clinton has never met a country she didn't want to:
Invade
Bomb to rubble
Impoverish
De-stabilize
Overthrow legitimate elected leaders
Wreak chaos
Create Resource Wars in
Hillary Clinton's foreign policies have driven the US to create humanitarian crises across the globe, poor people driven from their homes because of violence.....
When George Mitchell negotiated the Peace Deal, he went into detail about people only wanting to live in PEACE.....Yeah! Raise their families and provide for them.
Those families fleeing US created violence in Syria and Libya and Honduras and elsewhere wanted to raise their families in PEACE.
Hillary Clinton thought otherwise....because of Resource Wars and ENERGY, like Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP)


Joyce Venables and 2 others shared Janice Jopin's post.
Sarandon said an indictment over Clinton's email server is "inevitable."

HILL.CM



Susan Sarandon: Clinton ‘more dangerous’ than Trump

Actress Susan Sarandon says Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy makes her a greater national security risk than Donald Trump, adding that it's "inevitable" the White House hopeful will be indicted.
“I believe in a way she’s more dangerous, except they’re both talking to Henry Kissinger apparently lately,” Sarandon told The Young Turks on Thursday.
“Her record — I mean, she did not learn a thing from Iraq. She is an interventionist. She’s done horrible things, horrible things, and very callously," she added.
“I don’t know if she’s overcompensating or what her trip is. I think we’ll be in Iran in two seconds. That scares me. That frightens me.”
Sarandon, who supports Bernie Sanders for president, said Trump’s ideas are too implausible to be dangerous.
“This is what we’re fed — ‘he’s so dangerous, he’s so dangerous,’ ” she said. "Seriously, I’m not worried about a wall being built and Mexico paying for it.
“He’s not going to get rid of every Muslim living in this country. Has he made it the norm to be racist and vent these kinds of things? Yes. But seriously, I don’t know what his policies are."
On the other hand, Sarandon said, Clinton's record on foreign policy is cause for alarm.
“I do know what her policies are. I do know where she’s taking money from. And I do know that she’s not transparent and I know that nobody calls her on it.”
Sarandon predicted in a separate interview that Clinton will ultimately face indictment for her use of a private email server while secretary of State.
“Nobody’s even talking about this indictment,” she told MSNBC. "What happens with that, besides the trust issue of catching her in so many lies?”
“Well, there has been no indictment,” Chris Jansing responded.
“No, but there’s going to be,” responded Sarandon. "I mean, it’s inevitable."


http://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/282143-susan-sarandon-clinton-more-dangerous-than-trump


Bernie Sanders, "the Amendment King," has quietly done more to push the progressive agenda by improving bills that other legislators championed.
(Why do you suppose that he was standing behind Hillary Clinton in that (now famous) Childcare Act speech. He made her bill better with his thoughtful amendments.
Sometimes you can get more good done, by helping others, instead of championing your own cause.
HER ACCOMPLISHMENTS? ILLEGAL EMAIL USE!
What kind of experience does Bernie Sanders have? Let's take a look.
WWW.ALTERNET.ORG

Bernie Gets It Done: Sanders' Record of Pushing Through Major Reforms Will Surprise You



What kind of experience does Bernie Sanders have? Let's take a look.

By Zaid Jilani





“I'm a progressive, but I'm a progressive who likes to get things done,” Hillary Clinton said at the first Democratic debate, in response to a question from moderator Anderson Cooper about whether she defines herself as a moderate or a progressive.
The implication was that progressive Bernie Sanders is too far to the left to accomplish anything—all of his ideas are pie-in-the-sky. You have to be able to find the bipartisan, “warm, purple space” as Clinton said earlier this year, to get anything done. Slate's Jamelle Bouie was super-impressed by this rationale, saying Clinton has “skilled use of bureaucratic power.”
The problem with this narrative is that it is completely false. Not only has Sanders gotten a lot more things done than Clinton did in her own short legislative career, he's actually one of the most effective members of Congress, passing bills, both big and small, that have reshaped American policy on key issues like poverty, the environment and health care.
The Amendment King
Congress is not known to be a progressive institution lately, to say the least. Over the past few decades, the House of Representatives was only controlled by the Democrats from 2007 to 2010, and a flood of corporate money has quieted the once-powerful progressive movement that passed legislation moving the country forward between the New Deal era and the Great Society. Yet, as difficult as it may be to believe, a socialist from Vermont is one of its most accomplished members. 
Bernie Sanders was first elected to the House of Representatives in 1990, and many immediately doubted his efficacy. “It is virtually impossible for an independent to be effective in the House,” said then-Congressman Bill Richardson (D-NM). “As an independent you are kind of a homeless waif.” Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA), today an outspoken advocate for Hillary Clinton, said Bernie's “holier-than-thou attitude—saying in a very loud voice he is smarter than everyone else and purer than everyone else—really undercuts his effectiveness.”
As if things didn't look bad enough, in 1994 the Republicans swept into power in the House of Representatives, dashing the hopes of many that Congress could do anything progressive whatsoever. But Sanders was not content with tilting at windmills. He didn't want to just take a stand, he wanted to pass legislation that improved the United States of America. He found his vehicle in legislative amendments.
Amendments in the House of Representatives are often seen as secondary vehicles to legislation that individual members sponsor, but they are an important way to move resources and build bipartisan coalitions to change the direction of the law. Despite the fact that the most right-wing Republicans in a generation controlled the House of Representatives between 1994 and 2006, the member who passed the most amendments during that time was not a right-winger like Bob Barr or John Boehner. The amendment king was, instead, Bernie Sanders.
Sanders did something particularly original, which was that he passed amendments that were exclusively progressive, advancing goals such as reducing poverty and helping the environment, and he was able to get bipartisan coalitions of Republicans who wanted to shrink government or hold it accountable and progressives who wanted to use it to empower Americans.
Here are a few examples of the amendments Sanders passed by building unusual but effective coalitions:
  • Corporate Crime Accountability (February 1995): A Sanders amendment to the Victims Justice Act of 1995 required “offenders who are convicted of fraud and other white-collar crimes to give notice to victims and other persons in cases where there are multiple victims eligible to receive restitution.”
  • Saving Money, for Colleges and Taxpayers (April 1998): In an amendment to H.R. 6, the Higher Education Amendments of 1998, Sanders made a change to the law that allowed the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education to make competitive grants available to colleges and universities that cooperated to reduce costs through joint purchases of goods and services.
  • Holding IRS Accountable, Protecting Pensions (July 2002): Sanders' amendment to the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act of 2003 stopped the IRS from being able to use funds that “violate current pension age discrimination laws.” Although he faced stiff GOP opposition, his amendment still succeeded along a 308 to 121 vote.

    Expanding Free Health Care
 (November 2001): You wouldn't think Republicans would agree to an expansion of funds for community health centers, which provide some free services. But Sanders was able to win a $100 million increase in funding with an amendment.



  • Getting Tough On Child Labor (July 2001): A Sanders amendment to the general appropriations bill prohibited the importation of goods made with child labor.
  • Increasing Funding for Heating for the Poor (September 2004): Sanders won a $22 million increase for the low-income home energy assistance program and related weatherization assistance program.
  • Fighting Corporate Welfare and Protecting Against Nuclear Disasters (June 2005): A Sanders amendment brought together a bipartisan coalition that outnumbered a bipartisan coalition on the other side to successfully prohibit the Export-Import Bank from providing loans for nuclear projects in China.

  • Once Sanders made it to the Senate in 2006, his ability to use amendments to advance a progressive agenda was empowered. Here are some of the amendments he passed in the Senate:
    • Greening the U.S. Government (June 2007): A Sanders amendment made a change to the law so at least 30 percent of the hot water demand in newer federal buildings is provided through solar water heaters.
    • Protecting Our Troops (October 2007): Sanders used an amendment to win $10 million for operation and maintenance of the Army National Guard, which had been stretched thin and overextended by the war in Iraq.
    • Restricting the Bailout to Protect U.S. Workers (Feburary 2009): A Sanders amendment required the banking bailout to utilize stricter H-1B hiring standards to ensure bailout funds weren't used to displace American workers.
    • Helping Veterans' Kids (July 2009): A Sanders amendment required the Comptroller General to put together comprehensive reporting on financial assistance for child care available to parents in the Armed Forces.


    • Exposing Corruption in the Military-Industrial Complex (November 2012):
    • Support for Treating Autism in Military Health Care: Sanders worked with Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) to pass an amendment by a vote of 66-29 ensuring that the military's TRICARE system would be able to treat autism.
    Using the Power of a Senator
    While Sanders was an amendment king who was able to bring bipartisan coalitions together to make serious changes to laws, he also knew how to be a thorn in the side of the establishment until it offered up something in return. Sanders was able to get the first-ever audit of funds given out by the Federal Reserve, which made transparent over $2 trillion of funds handed out by the secretive organization. This was a cause that Republican congressman Ron Paul (TX) had been pursuing for decades, but Sanders was able to get the votes to do it by forging a compromise that required an audit for the bailout period alone.

    When the Affordable Care Act was in danger of not having the votes to pass, Sanders used his leverage to win enough funding for free health treatment for 10 million Americans through Community Health Centers. This gutsy move—holding out until the funds were put into the bill—has even Republican members of Congress requesting the funds, which have helped millions of Americans who otherwise would not have access.

    Another moment came when Sanders, who was then chair of the Veterans committee, worked with Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), to overhaul the Veterans Administration. McCain praised Sanders' work on the bill in an interview with National Journal. Sen. Jack Reed (D-RI) even went so far as to say the bill would never have passed without Sanders' ability to bring the parties to a deal.

    His Theory of Change, From Burlington to the White House

    The big question is, can Sanders translate his time as an effective senator into an effective president? After all, a legislative job is different than an executive job.

    But Sanders has a theory of change, in order to be an executive who can pass progressive policy even in the face of a recalcitrant Congress. He frequently talks about a “political revolution” that means vastly increasing voter turnout and participation in political activities so conservative lawmakers and Big Money are unable to overwhelm public opinion. During the Democratic debate, this line had its doubters, from former Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) to a skeptical Anderson Cooper.

    Sanders is probably not so unsure of himself. After all, he's done it before. When Sanders was mayor of Burlington, Vermont, one of his big accomplishments was to increase civic life in the city. During the course of his terms, voter turnout doubled. In his eight years as mayor, he rejuvenated a city that was considered by many to be dying, laying out progressive policies that cities around the country later adopted, and he did all this without particularly alienating Republicans. As one former GOP Alderman noted, he implemented ideas from the Republican party that he felt were not particularly harmful to working people, such as more efficient accounting practices.

    n that Bernie Sanders is not an effective lawmaker or executive. He has strong convictions and he stands by them, and we're often told that makes one a gadfly—someone who is out to make a point rather than make an actual change. But with Sanders we have the fusion of strong principles and the ability to forge odd bedfellow coalitions that accomplish historic things, like the audit of the Federal Reserve or the rejuvenation of Burlington that has served as a model for cities around the country. “Don't underestimate me,” Sanders said at the beginning of the race, words that anyone who knows his political and policy history take to heart.

    http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/bernie-gets-it-done-sanders-record-pushing-through-major-reforms-will-surprise-you


    No comments:

    Post a Comment