I ask one thing: DON'T BELIEVE!
Bombing Syria was in violation of INTERNATIONAL LAW....well when did the US ever worry about that? As well as being UNCONSTITUTIONAL without the approval of Congress....Trump is NOT dick - tator yet.
There's an article about Libya's chemicals ending up in Syria [Seymour Hersh].
Syria is about a PIPELINE - another resource WAR.
If the US were promoting clean energy, this wouldn't be an issue.
The US also provided chemicals/WMD to Iran, smuggled through Israel - remember Iran-Contra when the CIA flooded the US with drugs? [check out Gary Webb for those unfamiliar]
Maybe Americans don't know what the US did, but those in the Middle East know.
Anyone remember that Daddy Bush was CIA Director? And then there's Ollie North....Fox News = Fake News hero with immunity.
Evidence indicates Syria did NOT bomb using chemicals, rather they hit a chemical storage facility.
Trump's support was tanking...what better than to BOMB?
And Ivanka, with her vast foreign policy and military experience convinced Dad to BOMB?
NO MORE WARS BASED ON LIES!
NO MORE WARS!
https://gosint.wordpress.com/.../former-dia-colonel-us.../
http://www.globalresearch.ca/hillary-clinton.../5522647
http://readersupportednews.org/.../42947-trumps-illegal...
http://occupydemocrats.com/.../congressman-just-asked.../
http://m.dailykos.com/.../-Four-star-general-says...
http://realtimepolitics.com/.../omg-ivanka-just-made-a.../
http://occupydemocrats.com/.../ivanka-just-praised.../
http://yournewswire.com/truth-bomb-bbc-british-ambassador/
Customarily, I have the greatest respect for Fareed Zakaria, in this he is sorely mistaken.
It is truly baffling that the Corporate Media Propaganda Machines simply MARCH TO WAR without questioning the evidence.
Regrettably the United Nations has failed to even raise its voice.
A sad day!
Liberals have to avoid Trump Derangement Syndrome
Opinion writer
I didn’t really believe that there was such a thing as Trump Derangement Syndrome — hatred of President Trump so intense that it impairs people’s judgment. It’s not that I didn’t notice the harsh, unyielding language against him — I’ve said a few tough things myself — but that throughout the campaign, Trump seemed to do things that justified it. Once elected, instead of calming down and acting presidential, he continued the stream of petty attacks, exaggerations and lies. His administration seemed marked by chaos and incompetence.
And then came the strike against Syria. On that issue, Trump appears to have listened carefully to his senior national security professionals, reversed his earlier positions, chosen a calibrated response and acted swiftly. I supported the strike and pointed out — in print and on air — that Trump was finally being presidential because the action “seems to reflect a belated recognition from Trump that he cannot simply put America first — that the president of the United States must act on behalf of broader interests and ideals.” On the whole, though, I was critical of Trump’s larger Syria policy, describing it as “incoherent.” My Post column was titled, “One missile strike is not a strategy.”
From the response on the left, you would have thought I had just endorsed Trump for pope. Otherwise thoughtful columnists described my views as “nonsense” and a sign that the media has “bent over backward” to support Trump. (Really?) One journalist declared on television, “If that guy could have sex with this cruise missile attack, I think he would do it.” A gaggle of former Obama speechwriters discussed how my comments were perhaps “the stupidest” of any given on the subject.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/liberals-have-to-avoid-trump-derangement-syndrome/2017/04/13/81ff4a7a-2083-11e7-a0a7-8b2a45e3dc84_story.html?tid=ss_fb&utm_term=.d5a426197d2d#comments
No comments:
Post a Comment