Friday, January 10, 2020

How Ruth Bader Ginsburg Is Trying to Check the Conservative Majority





Reader Supported News
10 January 20

If we keep going at this pace we will fail financially for January. But we don’t want to offend anyone, so we are looking for feel-good way to panic.
The reality is that we need to pick up the pace.
Please.
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News


If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 95611



Reader Supported News
10 January 20
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


How Ruth Bader Ginsburg Is Trying to Check the Conservative Majority
Ruth Ginsburg answered audience questions during a 'fireside chat' at Roger Williams University Law School. (photo: Pat Greenhouse/Boston Globe)
Joan Biskupic, CNN
Biskupic writes: "Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is in the liberal minority on the Supreme Court but has a way of steering the debate on a case."
READ MORE

Debris of the Ukraine International Airlines plane that crashed after taking off from the airport near Tehran on Wednesday. (photo: Nazanin Tabatabaee/WANA)
Debris of the Ukraine International Airlines plane that crashed after taking off from the airport near Tehran on Wednesday. (photo: Nazanin Tabatabaee/WANA)

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau Addresses 'Shoot Down' of Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752
Ryan Pickrell, Business Insider
Pickrell writes: "Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said on Thursday afternoon that Canada had intelligence and evidence from multiple sources indicating 'that the plane was shot down by an Iranian surface-to-air missile.'"
READ MORE

Paratroopers assemble at Ft. Bragg, N.C., on Saturday. (photo: Hubert Delany III/AP)
Paratroopers assemble at Ft. Bragg, N.C., on Saturday. (photo: Hubert Delany III/AP)

Democrat-Led House Passes War Powers Resolution to Restrain Trump's Military Actions in Iran
Sarah D. Wire, Los Angeles Times
Wire writes: "With Thursday's House vote to limit President Trump's military actions against Iran, Congress took its latest stab at reaffirming its constitutional authority to declare war, part of a long-standing power struggle between the executive and legislative branches that has only grown murkier as the nature of global conflicts has changed."
READ MORE

Polling station in Iowa. (photo: Eric Thayer/Getty)
Polling station in Iowa. (photo: Eric Thayer/Getty)

As Iowa Caucuses Approach, Hundreds of People Await Decisions on Their Voting Rights
Jason Clayworth, The Des Moines Register
Clayworth writes: "It's been about a decade since Jarvis Guyton served two years in prison for a drug conviction. The recent college graduate, who played football at Grand View University, says he's getting his life back in order, and he wants to participate in Iowa's Feb. 3 presidential caucuses."
But his name is one of 330 on a backlog of convicted felons waiting for Gov. Kim Reynolds to approve restoration of their voting rights.
Since newly elected Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear last month abandoned the practice, Iowa is alone among U.S. states in requiring that the governor individually approve each application for restoration of voting rights.
Iowa's bottleneck threatens to deny Guyton and many others the chance to have a say in the state's first-in-the-nation nomination process.
“If a person don’t know how it feels to have their vote taken away, they don’t care about anything,” said Guyton, 31. “That’s how I see it.”
Guyton filed his application a few weeks ago — but others have waited for months.
And many more like them erroneously believe they could face criminal prosecution should they participate in the caucuses, a government accountability group says. Iowa's system for listing ineligible voters is rife with inaccuracies, which victimizes people who should be eligible to vote, according to the Campaign Legal Center, a nonpartisan group based in Washington, D.C. The group plans to hold a press conference Monday to highlight the issue.
More than 52,000 people in Iowa —  a number that is greater than the populations of 89 of the state's 99 counties — are currently prohibited from voting. 
Civil rights advocates have long said the ban disproportionately affects minorities, noting statistics from the Sentencing Project that show black people in Iowa are imprisoned at 11 times the rate of white people. Some have linked felon voter bans to Jim Crow actions taken by white-dominated legislatures to enforce racial segregation in the 19th and early 20th centuries.
The Campaign Legal Center in recent months stationed three organizers in Iowa to assist people seeking restoration of their voting rights. Monday's event will showcase the stories of some of the more than 250 people like Guyton whom it has tried to assist.
The group isn't ruling out the possibility of seeking legal action against the state if the flawed system is not fixed, or as in Kentucky, scrapped.
Short-term steps urged before caucuses
Reynolds has so far resisted signing an executive order like Beshear's to automatically restore the rights of felons who have completed their sentences. She says she wants to avoid adding to the confusion created by conflicting executive orders on felon voters signed by previous Iowa governors.
Instead, she wants the Legislature to begin the process to enact the change through a constitutional amendment. An amendment would be more resistant to political whims, but requires approval from the Legislature in two successive two-year sessions before it can be placed on the ballot for a statewide vote.
Reynolds sought an amendment in the 2019 session, but the effort was derailed by fellow Republicans who raised questions about what constituted actual completion of a sentence, such as whether it should hinge on full repayment of any restitution.
The Campaign Legal Center contends that, if Reynolds continues to call for the lengthy amendment process, she should at least consider some changes that would help speed the restoration process before the caucuses.
Among the recommended changes is a real-time database people can review to see whether they are eligible to vote; an expedited process to eliminate the backlog of voter restorations before Feb. 3; and clarification of complex Iowa policies that civil rights groups say result in thousands of people incorrectly believing they are ineligible to vote.
Such action is necessary to safeguard people’s constitutional rights and help maintain the integrity of Iowa's voting process, said Blair Bowie, a Campaign Legal Center attorney.
“Disenfranchisement in the state takes out a whole set of people who have a particular background, and those people tend to be disproportionately people of color and poor people,” Bowie said.
Longtime problems with ineligible voter list
The system Iowa uses to track people, including convicted felons, who are prohibited from voting has been shown to have numerous errors. In 2016 alone, 2,591 people had their voting rights restored after staff for Iowa Secretary of State Paul Pate determined they were incorrectly listed, records obtained by the Des Moines Register show.
A Register investigation published last year found that the ballots of more than two-dozen voters had been wrongly rejected since 2017 — including 20 in the November 2018 midterm elections — because their names erroneously appeared on the felon list the state circulates to county officials.
In addition, a Register review in September found that at least 69 Iowans who had been convicted in other states, and who had their voting rights restored after serving sentences there, remained on the list of felons ineligible to vote — despite an Iowa policy to recognize such restorations by other states.
On top of that, the Register in November identified people whose rights Reynolds had restored, yet who remained listed in the database as ineligible to vote.
Pate’s office did not respond Friday to a question about whether it would comply with a request to post a real-time database of ineligible voters. The Register has published a database it obtained from Pate’s office through a records request, and has repeatedly updated it as it obtains new records through additional requests. But the Register lacks the information necessary to update the database continuously.
Pate in November announced that his staff will manually review each of the more than 90,000 files in the felon database in a six-step verification process it hopes to complete before this year’s general election.
“We are improving our processes to make sure eligible voters are not deterred from casting ballots,” Pate said in a news release at the time. “My staff is going to dig through every record, no matter how old, double- and triple-check the information with the courts, and make sure everything is correct.”
Many mistakenly think they're ineligible
Reynolds’ office staff did not respond Friday to questions about Campaign Legal Center’s recommendations, but said 330 voter restorations were pending.
Reynolds — whose administration this year simplified the application process and eliminated a $15 processing fee — received 809 voter rights applications in 2019, granting 292. In addition, the governor sent 187 applications back to people it said mistakenly believed they were ineligible to vote and who did not need the governor’s clemency, according to information Reynolds provided to Iowa Public Radio for a story aired last week.
“We were doing fine for a while, but we are behind now. So I’m not going to say that we’re not,” Reynolds said in the radio interview. “But we’re doing everything we can, especially with an election coming up — we want to make sure that if they are entitled to vote, we give them that opportunity.”
The Brennan Center for Justice and the League of Women Voters of Iowa put the state on notice last year that they believe the database has inaccurately denied people their voting rights and violates federal law.
Bowie said the Campaign Legal Center has not ruled out pursuing or joining litigation against Iowa in connection with the problems.
“Felony disenfranchisement impacts tens of thousands of Iowans," Bowie wrote in a Dec. 16 letter to Reynolds. "They deserve a voice in our democracy and a say in the future of the state.”

A gun rights activist carries his handgun in a hip holster outside the Virginia state capitol building as the general assembly prepares to convene in Richmond, on 8 January. (photo: Jonathan Drake/Reuters)
A gun rights activist carries his handgun in a hip holster outside the Virginia state capitol building as the general assembly prepares to convene in Richmond, on 8 January. (photo: Jonathan Drake/Reuters)

Virginia Democrats Won an Election. Gun Owners Are Talking Civil War
Lois Beckett, Guardian UK
Beckett writes: "Thousands of Virginia residents have shown up at meetings across the state to try to block Democrats from enacting new gun laws, with some gun rights supporters openly discussing violent resistance and civil war."

EXCERPT:
When Democrats won control of Virginia’s state government for the first time in 26 years in November 2019, they pledged to pass a series of standard gun control laws, including universal background checks and bans on military-style “assault weapons” and high-capacity ammunition magazines. The agenda was no surprise: state Democrats had run for office on a platform of gun violence prevention, backed by funding from national gun control groups.
But the pledge sparked a grassroots pro-gun movement whose size and intensity has surprised even longtime activists. In dozens of towns and counties, pro-gun Virginians have flooded local government meetings to oppose the new bills and to demand that their lawmakers pass “second amendment sanctuary” resolutions, which promise that local governments will not enforce state gun laws they see as unconstitutional.
Some of these activists have warned of violence if Democrats push forward with gun control. Multiple Democratic lawmakers have reportedly received threats, including death threats. At heated public meetings across the state and in long social media comment threads, some gun rights supporters are openly discussing the possibility of civil war. Many have warned of the need to fight back against “tyranny” or have compared Democratic lawmakers to the British forces during the revolutionary war. “I really do think we may be on the brink of another war,” one speaker told a crowd of at least 800 people in Pulaski county, the Roanoke Times reported.

Young Muslim-Americans discuss their personal experiences of bigotry during wartime. (photo: VICE)
Young Muslim-Americans discuss their personal experiences of bigotry during wartime. (photo: VICE)

7 Americans on the Islamophobia They Faced at Home Because of War Abroad
Reina Sultan, VICE
Sultan writes: "To better understand how conflict with Iran might lead to a spike in domestic hatred, I asked other young Muslims about their personal experiences of bigotry during wartime."
READ MORE

Oil drilling operation. (photo: Linda Davidson/Getty)
Oil drilling operation. (photo: Linda Davidson/Getty)

Gas and Oil Will Save Us All, Say Oil and Gas Companies
Kate Yoder, Grist
Yoder writes: "The fossil fuel industry has been trying to sell people on the idea that natural gas is the answer to our climate predicament for more than a decade now."
READ MORE



No comments:

Post a Comment