Search This Blog

Translate

Blog Archive

Middleboro Review 2

NEW CONTENT MOVED TO MIDDLEBORO REVIEW 2

Toyota

Since the Dilly, Dally, Delay & Stall Law Firms are adding their billable hours, the Toyota U.S.A. and Route 44 Toyota posts have been separated here:

Route 44 Toyota Sold Me A Lemon



Showing posts with label Fiat Chrysler. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fiat Chrysler. Show all posts

Monday, January 8, 2018

Takata adds 3.3 million faulty airbags to largest automotive recall in U.S. history



Takata adds 3.3 million faulty airbags to largest automotive recall in U.S. history


By 
National Online Journalist  Global News


The Japanese airbag maker Takata continues to expand its massive parts recall by recalling an additional 3.3 million airbags.
According to reports from CBS, the latest addition to the recall includes airbags from some 2009, 2010 and 2013 vehicles made by Honda, Toyota, Audi, BMW, Daimler, Fiat Chrysler, Ford, General Motors, Jaguar-Land Rover, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Subaru and Tesla.
WATCH: Class action lawsuits against Takata

Takata is an automotive parts supplier that filed for bankruptcy in June after sparking the largest automotive recall in U.S. history with a recall of three million vehicles in 2014. Since then, the recall has been intermittently expanded.
Forbes reports that defective Takata airbags could potentially explode in a crash and spray vehicle occupants with small metal shards.
WATCH: Recall impact on Japanese car maker Takata


The bags have been linked to over 180 injuries and 18 deaths, including the most recent one identified in Louisiana last month.
Just a few days into 2018, the judge overseeing the bankruptcy of Takata Corp’s U.S. unit cleared the way for the company’s creditors to vote on its chapter 11 plan — which critics say limits the legal rights of those who’ve been injured by the faulty airbags.
Criticisms include claims that the plan favours automakers over vehicle owners. The trust would pay compensation based on the injury, ranging from $10,000 to $5 million USD for death or loss of eyesight, according to hearing documents.
However, car owners would be barred from suing Honda, and other auto makers who opted to join the trust arrangement.
Currently there are plans for a supplier owned by China’s Ningbo Joyson Electronic Corp., plans to acquire the Takata Corp.
These recalls have included Takata airbags in Canada, two of which took place in December 2017.
The first recalled faulty airbags on 2004, 2005 and 2006 Ford Rangers and the second involved faulty airbags on 2016 and 2017 Mitsubishi I-Mievs.
WATCH: Takata airbag recall becomes largest auto recall in U.S. history

Approximately 30,000 Ford Rangers were affected, while just over 200 Mitsubishi I-Mievs were affected.
Forbes goes on to report that almost two-thirds, or 31.5 million U.S. vehicles affected have not been repaired as of mid-September, according to an independent report released in November.
-With files from Reuters. 
https://globalnews.ca/news/3950585/takata-recalls-millions-more-faulty-airbags/

Saturday, June 24, 2017

FCA tries to dodge Demon responsibility





Larry P. Vellequette








FCA tries to dodge Demon responsibility











Dodge, in a three-page "customer acknowledgement," tells customers they must understand the Demon's power and potential for personal destruction.​
It seems I have some company when it comes to concern over how the general public will use/misuse the 840-hp Dodge Demon when it arrives later this year.
Given the tone of the very seriously written acknowledgment letter (which you can read in full here) that Demon buyers will be forced to sign in front of a notary just to place an order, it seems Fiat Chrysler and its legal defense team have some similar issues. The letter was revealed Wednesday on Allpar.com, the FCA-centric website.

As I did to much wailing and gnashing of teeth in April, I still take great issue with the nearly treadless Nitto drag radials that come standard on the $86,090 Challenger SRT Demon. Their lack of tread make them extremely dangerous in wet and cold conditions, and I suggested that making the drag radials a $1 option or even traditionally treaded street tires a $1 option was an easy -- though admittedly less profitable -- fix.
Funny thing: In the acknowledgment letter, Demon customers are warned that the "Drag tires are not recommended for driving in wet weather conditions where there is a risk of hydroplaning." They are also told, sternly, that "Customer shall not move the vehicle in temperatures below 15 degrees (Fahrenheit) with the Drag Tires. In temperatures below 15? F, the Drag Tires can lose flexibility and that may lead to cracking and other tire damage."
So you can't move the Demon below 15 degrees? Has anybody considered that this car is scheduled to be built over the winter? In Canada?
And speaking of those problematic tires, better not take them on the highway, the letter warns: "They are not intended for highway use, as the expected miles of wear from the racing compound is greatly reduced."

I also took issue with the Demon's launch control, suggesting that it was unconscionable to allow consumers to instantaneously engage the system, potentially unleashing the Demon's full horsepower every time they pull up next to a Corvette or a Tesla. As an alternative, I suggested a two-minute delay before the launch control would be fully engaged, which would make it harder for amateurs to endanger the motoring public every time their manhoods were challenged at a stoplight.
Funny thing: The acknowledgment letter also forces the Demon buyer to agree that he or she will "never use any 'Track-Use' features, functions, equipment or parts on public roads or any other prohibited area. The intended use of 'Track-Use' features, functions, equipment or parts is for race vehicles on race tracks."
Dodge's acknowledgment letter for the Demon also goes to great lengths to make sure that the potential customer, "their personal representatives and heirs and next of kin" (I have a feeling "next of kin" is going to be used a lot more than people want to accept) understand the Demon's power and potential for personal destruction.​ To order a Demon, the customer must agree that he or she "assumes all risk" and waives "any and all claims against FCA US LLC and/or Dealer."
Of course, the letter is absolutely silent about what happens when the Demon is sold used to a second legal owner.

Saturday, June 10, 2017

'It was dripping fire onto her leg': Public insurer sues Fiat Chrysler after 2 vehicles catch fire



Now we have to worry about the visor catching fire? 

'It was dripping fire onto her leg': Public insurer sues Fiat Chrysler after 2 vehicles catch fire

Manitoba Public Insurance files 2 claims against automaker

June 9, 2017




Morrison vehicle
Jill Morrison captured video of her 2011 Dodge Durango after 
the smoke started billowing out of the driver's side visor area. 
(Supplied photo)



Manitoba Public Insurance is taking Fiat Chrysler to court after two of its vehicles caught fire in Manitoba, alleging there was faulty wiring in the sun visors.
The owners of one of the vehicles reported a fire during a trip in their 2011 Dodge Durango, even after having work done on the SUV's sun visor months earlier as recommended in a July 2014 safety recall.
"It was completely engulfed by the time the fire department arrived," said Rodel Morrison, who with his wife, Jill, owns the vehicle, named in one of two separate lawsuits filed by the public insurer.
On June 4, 2015, Jill and her mother were returning home to the small town of Melita from Brandon when the fire started.


"They were about 10 minutes from home and then some smoke started to billow up from under the driver's sun visor, and she immediately hit the phone button on the stereo and phoned me and said, 'Well, what do I do?'" Morrison said.
'There was fire actually dripping down ... like it was melting the foam and it was dripping fire onto her leg.'- Rodel Morrison, vehicle owner
His wife pulled the visor down and saw a burnt hole with smoke billowing out, so she turned onto a side road and stopped.
"In those three minutes she said there was fire actually dripping down onto her leg off of the roof, like it was melting the foam and it was dripping fire onto her leg," Morrison said.
The safety recall warned that "wiring for the vanity lamp in the sun visor may short circuit, after a service repair is performed. If the vanity lamp wiring shorts, there is an increased risk of fire."
Poster of video clip



00:00 00:29
Dodge Durango goes up in flames 0:29
After receiving the notice, the Morrisons dutifully brought their car in for the fix, but that didn't prevent the fire that consumed their SUV several month later.
"I just feel that Chrysler's solution was just a patch," Morrison said, adding the company could have come up with a better solution to a "huge fire hazard."
He said wiring spacers were installed in his Durango's sun visor as recommended, but more should have been done.
Morrison said he and his wife warned everyone they knew who owned Jeeps or Durangos about the problem.

'Problems with that recall'

A few months after the 2015 fire in the Durango, they received a second notice, telling them their vehicle could still be at risk for a fire if service repairs are done and that dealers will replace the sun visors. 
The Automobile Protection Association said the recalls are on its radar.
"There were problems with that recall," said APA president George Iny. "Vehicles continued to catch fire in some cases after the recall so Chrysler had to issue a recall of the recall."
But Iny said he's surprised MPI is taking the automaker to court.
George Iny
George Iny, Automobile Protection Association president, said 
Chrysler had to issue a "recall of a recall" after some vehicles 
continued to catch fire. (CBC)
"Usually these deals are settled out of court and with confidentiality," Iny said, "and often the government isn't told about them."
"I am surprised, really astonished, to see that a car maker would let MPIC have to go this far before stepping up to the plate and paying off the vehicle," Iny said.
A previous case of a visor fire in a Durango following an initial recall fix was reported by CBC last year in Newfoundland and Labrador.
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles said it doesn't comment on ongoing litigation but in a statement to CBC it said, "Safety is paramount at FCA Canada. We urge our customers to heed the instructions on recall notices so we may help them resolve any outstanding issues. Those uncertain about the status of their vehicles are encouraged to inquire with registered dealers, or check their VINs using any of the various online search engines."
Fiat Chrysler didn't say how many reports it had of fires among vehicles affected by the recall but acknowledged that "overheating conditions were reported among a small percentage of vehicles (<0.02%) serviced in connection with a related recall, conducted previously."
In an email, Fiat Chrysler said an investigation found that if the service procedure was not followed "precisely" it "may leave vehicles susceptible to a short-circuit, creating a potential fire hazard."
MPI declined to say why it decided to pursue this case in court. Spokesperson Brian Smiley said, "The corporation does not comment on active litigation matters."

Insurer seeks $34K for Durango damages

The lawsuit seeks damages totalling $34,725.67 for the Dodge Durango, which the claim says was damaged beyond repair.
Morrison car fire
The Dodge Durango owned by Jill and Rodel Morrison 
caught fire as Jill was driving the vehicle on the highway 
near Melita, Manitoba. (Supplied photo)
As for Rodel, he's pleased the public insurer is taking the company to court.
"I'm glad. I think they should make Chrysler accountable for this mistake they made," he said.
While no one in his family was injured in the incident, he worries others might not be so lucky.
"Someone leaves their child in a vehicle, they run in ... to grab something," Morrison said, "and they end up visiting for a couple of minutes and they come out and their kid could be strapped in the vehicle and it be engulfed in flames because it only took three or four minutes for our vehicle to go from smoke to fire dripping down from the roof."
The MPI statement of claim also names the Brandon dealership where the Morrisons bought their vehicle — Murray Chrysler Westman Ltd. — as a defendant in the lawsuit.
Murray Chrysler Westman general manager Chris Smale said he had not yet received the statement of claim and declined to comment.

Jeep Overland went up in flames in 2016

In a second lawsuit filed the same day, June 1, MPI is suing FCA North America Holdings, FCA US, FCA Canada, and the dealership Winnipeg Dodge Chrysler Ltd. related to another fire.
The claim seeks $28,828.14 plus other costs in a case involving a 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee Overland. The claim alleges "the Jeep was designed and manufactured with sun visor lamp wiring which was prone to overheating, electrical failure and fire."
'We did everything correctly.'- Glen Trafford, a vice-president at the Walt Morris Group of Companies
Winnipeg Dodge sold the Jeep to a buyer in May 2015. Then on August 30, 2016, the vehicle caught fire while it was being driven on Highway 7 near Balmoral, Man., the claim said.
MPI alleges "the fire was caused by defects in the design, manufacture, assembly, and installation of the wiring."
Glen Trafford, a vice-president at the Walt Morris Group of Companies, which owns Winnipeg Dodge Chrysler, said any fault lies with the manufacturer, not with his dealership.
He said when the customer bought the vehicle, it had passed a safety inspection as required by MPI and there was no outstanding recall on the visor lamp wiring at that time.
"We have clearly met all responsibility to this issue," Trafford said. "We did everything correctly."
A safety recall on the visor lamp wiring was issued after the customer purchased the Jeep, Trafford said.
The allegations in the lawsuits have not been proven in court. 
Poster of video clip



00:00 02:33
MPI sues Fiat Chrysler after 2 vehicles catch fire 2:33

Got a tip for the CBC I-Team? Email iteam@cbc.ca or call the confidential tip line at 204-788-3744.