Search This Blog

Translate

Blog Archive

Middleboro Review 2

NEW CONTENT MOVED TO MIDDLEBORO REVIEW 2

Toyota

Since the Dilly, Dally, Delay & Stall Law Firms are adding their billable hours, the Toyota U.S.A. and Route 44 Toyota posts have been separated here:

Route 44 Toyota Sold Me A Lemon



Showing posts with label Joe Manchin [D-WV]. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joe Manchin [D-WV]. Show all posts

Saturday, December 7, 2019

Pro-Kavanaugh Councilman: ‘Better Get Your Coat Hangers Ready’





DEEPSOUTHVOICE.COM
A West Virginia city councilman allegedly insinuated that women should prepare to have dangerous back alley abortions after the U.S. Senate confirmed Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court on Saturday. http://deepsouthvoice.com/index.php/2018/10/07/pro-kavana...


A West Virginia city councilman seemed to insinuate that women should prepare to have dangerous back alley abortions in light of the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court.
“Better get you’re coathangers ready liberals,” (sic) Parkersburg City Councilman Eric Barber, an anti-abortion activist, wrote in a now-deleted Facebook comment to a private group after West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin – a Democrat – announced he would support Kavanaugh’s confirmation. The comment can still be seen thanks to screenshots shared by local residents.



https://www.deepsouthvoice.com/index.php/2018/10/07/pro-kavanaugh-councilman-better-get-your-coat-hangers-ready?fbclid=IwAR0H8zNTxARFaM5B11SQhe3KD-eJF127ffE-f8Q9jmyaqPD9JlDJK8Ns_ag





Thursday, November 7, 2019

RSN: Norman Solomon | The Crass Warfare of Billionaires Against Sanders and Warren





Reader Supported News
07 November 19

Is what our work at RSN has become. It’s real, it’s pervasive and most people would rather not look at it.
This is a pretty serious battle against some pretty serious people.
A budget would be a big help.
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News


If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts
CA 95611



Reader Supported News
07 November 19
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!

RSN: Norman Solomon | The Crass Warfare of Billionaires Against Sanders and Warren
Sanders and Warren. (photo: BuzzFeed/Getty Images)
Norman Solomon, Reader Supported News
Solomon writes: "For many decades, any politician daring to fight for economic justice was liable to be denounced for engaging in 'class warfare.' It was always a grimly laughable accusation, coming from wealthy elites as well as their functionaries in corporate media and elective office. In the real world, class warfare - or whatever you want to call it - has always been an economic and political reality."

In recent decades, class war in the USA has become increasingly lopsided. The steady decline in union membership, the worsening of income inequality, and the hollowing out of the public sector have been some results of ongoing assaults on social decency and countless human lives. Corporate power has run amuck.
Now, the billionaire class is worried. For the first time in memory, there’s a real chance that the next president could threaten the very existence of billionaires — or at least significantly reduce their unconscionable rate of wealth accumulation — in a country and on a planet with so much human misery due to extreme economic disparities.
In early fall, when Bernie Sanders said “I don’t think that billionaires should exist,” many billionaires heard an existential threat. It was hardly a one-off comment; the Bernie 2020 campaign followed up with national distribution of a bumper sticker saying “Billionaires should not exist.”
When Elizabeth Warren stands on a debate stage and argues for a targeted marginal tax on the astronomically rich, such advocacy is anathema to those who believe that the only legitimate class war is the kind waged from the top down. In early autumn, CNBC reported that “Democratic donors on Wall Street and in big business are preparing to sit out the presidential campaign fundraising cycle — or even back President Donald Trump — if Sen. Elizabeth Warren wins the party’s nomination.”
As for Bernie Sanders — less than four years after he carried every county in West Virginia against Hillary Clinton in the presidential primary — the state’s Democratic senator Joe Manchin flatly declared last week that if Sanders wins the nomination, he will not vote for his party’s nominee against Trump in November 2020.
Some billionaires support Trump and some don’t. But few billionaires have a good word to say about Sanders or Warren. And the pattern of billionaires backing their Democratic rivals is illuminating.
“Dozens of American billionaires have pulled out their checkbooks to support candidates engaged in a wide-open battle for the Democratic presidential nomination,” Forbes reported this summer. The dollar total of those donations given directly to a campaign (which federal law limits to $2,800 each) is less significant than the sentiment they reflect. And people with huge wealth are able to dump hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars at once into a Super PAC, which grassroots-parched AstroTurf candidate Joe Biden greenlighted last month.
The donations from billionaires to the current Democratic candidates could be viewed as a kind of Oligarchy Confidence Index, based on data from the Federal Election Commission. As reported by Forbes, Pete Buttigieg leads all the candidates with 23 billionaire donors, followed by 18 for Cory Booker, and 17 for Kamala Harris. Among the other candidates who have qualified for the debate coming up later this month, Biden has 13 billionaire donors and Amy Klobuchar has 8, followed by 3 for Elizabeth Warren, 1 for Tulsi Gabbard, and 1 for Andrew Yang. Meanwhile, Bernie Sanders has zero billionaire donors.
(The tenth person who has qualified for the next debate, self-funding billionaire candidate Tom Steyer, is in a class by himself.)
Meanwhile, relying on contributions from small donors, Sanders and Warren “eagerly bait, troll and bash billionaires at every opportunity,” in the words of a recent Los Angeles Times news story. “They send out missives to donors boasting how much damage their plans would inflict on the wallets of specific wealthy families and corporations.”
The newspaper added: “Sanders boasts that his wealth tax would cost Amazon owner Jeff Bezos $8.9 billion per year. He even championed a bill with the acronym BEZOS: The Stop Bad Employers By Zeroing Out Subsidies Act would have forced Amazon and other large firms to pay the full cost of food stamps and other benefits received by their lowest-wage employees.”
For extremely rich people who confuse net worth with human worth, the prospect of losing out on billions is an outrageous possibility. And so, a few months ago, Facebook mega-billionaire Mark Zuckerberg expressed his antipathy toward Warren while meeting with employees. As a transcript of leaked audio makes clear, Warren’s vision of using anti-trust laws to break up Big Tech virtual monopolies was more than Facebook’s head could stand to contemplate.
“But look,” Zuckerberg said, “at the end of the day, if someone’s going to try to threaten something that existential, you go to the mat and you fight.”
The fight happening now for the Democratic presidential nomination largely amounts to class warfare. And the forces that have triumphed in the past are outraged that they currently have to deal with so much progressive opposition. As Carl von Clausewitz observed, “A conqueror is always a lover of peace.”


Norman Solomon is co-founder and national coordinator of RootsAction.org. He was a Bernie Sanders delegate from California to the 2016 Democratic National Convention and is currently a coordinator of the relaunched independent Bernie Delegates Network. Solomon is the author of a dozen books including War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death.
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.


Update My Monthly Donation







Wednesday, August 28, 2019

FOCUS: Matt Taibbi | John Hickenlooper Is the New Joe Lieberman





Reader Supported News
27 August 19

Funding or Bust, Harsh but Real
We gotta have it, a working budget. If you are not an active donor, we need you. Look at what RSN does. Is it worth it? Chip in, give this project a boost.
In Solidarity,
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News
Sure, I'll make a donation!

Update My Monthly Donation

If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 95611




Reader Supported News
27 August 19
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


FOCUS: Matt Taibbi | John Hickenlooper Is the New Joe Lieberman 
John Hickenlooper Second 2020 Democratic Party Presidential Debate. (photo: Matt Baron/Shutterstock)
Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone
Taibbi writes: "The tweet seems harmless enough, on the surface. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee's account slapped its logo atop a John Hickenlooper for Colorado ad and gave the presidential dropout a big thumbs up."
READ MORE



Saturday, November 25, 2017

Democratic Prostitutes SCREW AMERICANS! Speak out!



Four Banking Committee Democrats — Joe Donnelly, D-Ind., Heidi Heitkamp, D-N.D., Jon Tester, D-Mont., and Mark Warner, D-Va. — negotiated the bill with committee chair Mike Crapo, R-Idaho. Tim Kaine, last year’s vice presidential nominee, signed on as an original co-sponsor along with Joe Manchin D-W.Va., Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., Gary Peters D-Mich., and Angus King, I-Maine.



Reader Supported News
25 November 17
It's Live on the HomePage Now: 
Reader Supported News


FOCUS: Robert Reich | Nothing Fosters More Congressional Bipartisanship Than Carrying Out the Wishes of Big Banks 
Former Clinton labor secretary Robert Reich. (photo: Steve Russell/Toronto Star) 
Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Facebook Page 
Reich writes: "Who says bipartisanship is dead? Consider the agreement reached between 9 Senate Democrats and the top Republican on the Senate Banking Committee to roll back several key financial regulations, including sections of the Dodd-Frank Act." 
READ MORE

ho says bipartisanship is dead? Consider the agreement reached between 9 Senate Democrats and the top Republican on the Senate Banking Committee to roll back several key financial regulations, including sections of the Dodd-Frank Act.
1. Banks with less than $10 billion in assets would be allowed to sell high-risk mortgages without the disclosure and ability-to-pay rules in place across the industry.
2. They’d also be free from several reporting requirements, the Volcker rule restrictions on market trading with their own deposits, and numerous capital standards.
3. The bill raises the threshold for “systemically important financial institutions" from $50 billion to $250 billion in assets, thereby freeing dozens of banks from enhanced Federal Reserve supervision and larger capital requirements.
4. There’s also an exemption from mortgage rules for manufactured homes like trailers, the largest producer of which is Clayton Homes, a division of Warren Buffett’s conglomerate Berkshire Hathaway. Congress has already exempted auto dealers from many lending regulations.
5. Another measure would allow hedge funds to create investment vehicles that share a name with an affiliated bank. It’s a marketing effort to give funds credibility; the biggest advocate for the change was BlackRock, the largest asset manager in the world.
Consumer protections in the bill are relatively modest. With the scandals at Wells Fargo and Equifax, Congress doesn't need to do favors for banks in order to pass robust new consumer protections.
Four Banking Committee Democrats — Joe Donnelly, D-Ind., Heidi Heitkamp, D-N.D., Jon Tester, D-Mont., and Mark Warner, D-Va. — negotiated the bill with committee chair Mike Crapo, R-Idaho. Tim Kaine, last year’s vice presidential nominee, signed on as an original co-sponsor along with Joe Manchin D-W.Va., Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., Gary Peters D-Mich., and Angus King, I-Maine.
Why would Senate Democrats ever agree to this banking bonanza? Five of these senators face re-election next year and come from states won decisively by President Donald Trump. The rest either don’t know how bad the bill is or depend on campaign donations from Wall Street.
Nothing fosters more bipartisanship in Congress than following the wishes of the banking industry.
What do you think?

Become a Fan of RSN on Facebook and Twitter