Search This Blog

Translate

Blog Archive

Middleboro Review 2

NEW CONTENT MOVED TO MIDDLEBORO REVIEW 2

Toyota

Since the Dilly, Dally, Delay & Stall Law Firms are adding their billable hours, the Toyota U.S.A. and Route 44 Toyota posts have been separated here:

Route 44 Toyota Sold Me A Lemon



Showing posts with label Republican Hypocrisy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Republican Hypocrisy. Show all posts

Monday, October 20, 2014

Tea Baggers Take Note!




The article below is lengthy and most Tea Baggers lack the requisite attention span....it's worth reading for normal people!




Obamacare has been wildly successful providing Health Care, in many cases to people who have never enjoyed that 'luxury.'  It has been baffling that Tea Baggers continue to support its repeal without justification or adequate alternative. [In the upper left corner, there is a SEARCH feature, type in Obamacare for a few of the success stories. At the bottom of the first page, click on OLDER POSTS to view additional information.]


Were it not for Republicans, Medicare would have been expanded decades ago. It's been wildly popular and is FINANCIALLY SOLVENT.

Republicans steadfastedly ignored the rising numbers of uninsured.
What kind of a nation are we?

Is that really a political party for the future?

Look around and you'll find every single Dinosaur Republican is supporting that platform - former Massachusetts Senator Scooter Brown, et al.

[The real solution is Single Payer!]



Beyond that, SNAP funding, Food Stamp funding has been slashed, leaving many Americans hungry. Is that how we define a nation that allows its citizens to go hungry because that's what the Dirty Energy Koch Brothers preach?

Please re-think your bad choices!










This is what happens when seeking medical care means risking bankruptcy.

A Galveston medical student describes life and death in the non-existent Texas safety net.
ALTERNET.ORG


http://www.alternet.org/personal-health/i-watched-my-patients-die-treatable-diseases-because-they-were-poor





Sunday, November 10, 2013

Senator Lindsey Graham [Wacko-SC] Now Silent????


Steve Marmel
And Blanche DuBois (R-S.C.) goes awol on the issue.

I'm sure he's crafting an eloquent apology to the administration for threatening to hold every nomination over a falsehood.

No?...


-
Steve Marmel
Http://Fb.com/TheMarmelPage

Story from
Talking Points Memo:

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) trumpeted the recent "60 Minutes" piece on last year's attack in Benghazi perhaps louder than any other Republican, but he's been mostly silent since CBS News retracted the report on Friday.

After TPM submitted multiple requests for comment, a spokesman for Graham finally responded with an email saying that the senator "will be a guest on CNN State of the Union discussing the latest on Benghazi and the Iranian nuclear program" this Sunday.

Graham has drawn heavy attention to the "60 Minutes" report since it first aired on Oct. 27.

On the heels of the "60 Minutes" report, Graham announced his intention to block every Obama administration appointee until survivors of the Benghazi attack testify before Congress.
 
 
 
And Blanche DuBois (R-S.C.) goes awol on the issue.

I'm sure he's crafting an eloquent apology to the administration for threatening to hold every nomination over a falsehood.

No?

- @[216484961711918:274:Steve Marmel]
Http://Fb.com/TheMarmelPage

Story from @[98658495398:274:Talking Points Memo]:

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) trumpeted the recent "60 Minutes" piece on last year's attack in Benghazi perhaps louder than any other Republican, but he's been mostly silent since CBS News retracted the report on Friday.

After TPM submitted multiple requests for comment, a spokesman for Graham finally responded with an email saying that the senator "will be a guest on CNN State of the Union discussing the latest on Benghazi and the Iranian nuclear program" this Sunday.

Graham has drawn heavy attention to the "60 Minutes" report since it first aired on Oct. 27.

On the heels of the "60 Minutes" report, Graham announced his intention to block every Obama administration appointee until survivors of the Benghazi attack testify before Congress.
 
 
 
 
 
 

Defining Moral Bankruptcy!


Christians for a Change shared Blueprint Campaign Consulting's photo.
 
 
It's the hypocrisy that drives us nuts.

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Dick Cheney's Heartless Hypocrisy


Interesting take on the pervasive Hypocrisy.....


Former Vice President Dick Cheney being interviewed by SiriusXM Patriot host David Webb, 10/25/11. (photo: Brendan Hoffman/Getty Images)
Former Vice President Dick Cheney being interviewed by SiriusXM Patriot host David Webb, 10/25/11. (photo: Brendan Hoffman/Getty Images)

Dick Cheney's Heartless Hypocrisy

By Robert Parry, Consortium News
23 October 13

ormer Vice President Dick Cheney, out promoting his new book Heart about how his life was saved by very expensive heart-transplant surgery, is simultaneously praising the Tea Party, which is hard at work trying to prevent less fortunate Americans from getting anything close to the government-financed care that spared Cheney.

In an appearance on NBC's "Today" show, Cheney called the Tea Party and its fierce opposition to government spending a "good thing." He also noted how the Tea Party made possible the insurgent Wyoming Senate campaign of his daughter Liz because she was "partly motivated" by the same concerns about high taxes, high national debt and the cost of the Affordable Care Act.
 
Out of that zeal to repeal Obamacare, the Tea Party and its congressional adherents provoked this month's government shutdown and near credit default. Yet, Cheney declared, "I've got a lot of respect for what the people are doing."
 
But what the Tea Party has been doing is trying to prevent the federal government from implementing reforms in the health-insurance system that would enable some 30 million Americans, including many with pre-existing conditions, to obtain insurance often at reduced or subsidized prices. The Tea Party is also fighting expansion of Medicaid for poor families in states controlled by Republicans.
 
In other words, the Tea Party wants to force Americans with pre-existing medical conditions - like, say, a diseased heart - to remain at the mercy of greedy insurance companies that have made a lucrative business plan out of denying coverage to the people who need it most.
 
Such a victim of America's perverse health-care system would have been Dick Cheney, who has had at least five heart attacks dating back to when he was 37. But Cheney was lucky enough to qualify for government-funded health care as a federal employee for most of his adult life, including his time in the Nixon administration, his service in Congress, and his eight years as vice president. As a retired official who is now over 65, he further qualifies for Medicare and other health benefits.
 
The cost of the heart transplant alone over the first year is estimated at $1 million, and the 72-year-old Cheney has received a variety of other expensive heart procedures over the decades.
 
Saving the Cheney Family
 
But Cheney's personal hypocrisy regarding the federal government's role to "provide for … the general Welfare" when it comes to less fortunate Americans did not start with the life-saving gift of a new heart. It traces back to the Cheney family's rise from the hard-scrabble life that confronted many hard-working Americans who were buffeted by the periodic financial crises of unrestrained capitalism, the system idealized by the Tea Party.
 
In Cheney's 2011 memoir, In My Time, he acknowledges that his personal success was made possible by Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal and the fact that Cheney's father managed to land a steady job with the federal government. "I've often reflected on how different was the utterly stable environment he provided for his family and wondered if because of that I have been able to take risks, to change directions, and to leave one career path for another with hardly a second thought," Cheney wrote.
 
In that sense, Cheney's self-assuredness may be as much a product of the New Deal as the many bridges, dams and other public works that Roosevelt commissioned in the 1930s to get Americans back to work. By contrast, the insecurity that afflicted Cheney's father was a byproduct of the vicissitudes from laissez-faire capitalism.
 
In sketching his family's history, Cheney depicted the struggles of farmers and small businessmen scratching out a living in the American Midwest and suffering devastating reversals whenever the titans of Wall Street stumbled into a financial crisis and the bankers cut off credit.
 
After his ancestors would make some modest headway from their hard work, they would find themselves back at square one, again and again, because of some "market" crisis or a negative weather pattern. Whenever there was a financial panic or a drought, everything was lost.
 
"In 1883, as the country struggled through a long economic depression, the sash and door factory that [Civil War veteran Samuel Fletcher Cheney] co-owned [in Defiance, Ohio] had to be sold to pay its debts," Cheney wrote. "At the age of fifty-four, Samuel Cheney had to start over," moving to Nebraska.
 
There, Samuel Cheney built a sod house and began a farm, enjoying some success until a drought hit, again forcing him to the edge. Despite a solid credit record, he noted that "the banks will not loan to anyone at present" and, in 1896, he had to watch all his possessions auctioned off at the Kearney County Courthouse. Samuel Cheney started another homestead in 1904 and kept working until he died in 1911 at the age of 82.
 
His third son, Thomas, who was nicknamed Bert (and who would become Dick Cheney's grandfather), tried to build a different life as a cashier and part owner of a Sumner, Kansas, bank, named Farmers and Merchants Bank. But he still suffered when the economy crashed.
 
"Despite all his plans and success, Bert Cheney found that, like his father, he couldn't escape the terrible power of nature," Dick Cheney wrote. "When drought struck in the early 1930s, farmers couldn't pay their debts, storekeepers had to close their doors, and Farmers and Merchants Bank went under. … My grandparents lost everything except for the house in which they lived."
 
Bert Cheney's son, Richard, ventured off in a different direction, working his way through Kearney State Teachers College and taking the civil service exam. He landed a job as a typist with the Veterans Administration in Lincoln, Nebraska. "After scraping by for so long, he found the prospect of a $120 monthly salary and the security of a government job too good to turn down," his son, Dick Cheney, wrote. "Before long he was offered a job with another federal agency, the Soil Conservation Service.
 
"The SCS taught farmers about crop rotation, terraced planting, contour plowing, and using 'shelter belts' of trees as windbreaks - techniques that would prevent the soil from blowing away, as it had in the dust storms of the Great Depression. My dad stayed with the SCS for more than thirty years, doing work of which he was immensely proud. He was also proud of the pension that came with federal employment - a pride that I didn't understand until as an adult I learned about the economic catastrophes that his parents and grandparents had experienced and that had shadowed his own youth."
 
Like many Americans, the Cheney family felt it had been pulled from the depths of the Great Depression by the New Deal efforts of Franklin Roosevelt, cementing the family's support for the Democratic president and his party. "When I was born [on Jan. 30, 1941] my granddad wanted to send a telegram to the president," Cheney wrote in his memoir. "Both sides of my family were staunch New Deal Democrats, and Granddad was sure that FDR would want to know about the 'little stranger' with whom he now had a birthday in common."
 
After growing up in the relative comfort of middle-class, post-World War II America, Dick Cheney would take advantage of the many opportunities that presented themselves, attaching himself to powerful Republican politicians, most notably an ambitious congressman from Illinois named Donald Rumsfeld.
 
When Rumsfeld left Congress for posts in the Nixon administration, he brought the hard-working Cheney along. Eventually Rumsfeld became White House chief of staff to President Gerald Ford and - when Rumsfeld was tapped to become Defense Secretary in 1975 - he recommended his young aide, Dick Cheney, to succeed him.
 
Cheney's career path through the ranks of Republican national politics, with occasional trips through the revolving door into lucrative private-sector jobs, was set. He would become a major player within the GOP Establishment, establishing for himself a reputation as one of the most conservative members of Congress and a foreign policy hawk.
 
Cheney is now recognized as a right-wing Republican icon, inspiring a new generation of conservatives to dismantle what's left of Roosevelt's New Deal and shrink the federal government so it won't be there to help some other struggling family trying to make it into the middle class and achieve the American Dream.
 
Indeed, if the father in that struggling family suffers from heart disease - and if the family is denied affordable health insurance due to that pre-existing condition - Cheney's right-wing Tea Party policies would coldly calculate that the father's life would not be worth saving.
 
 
 

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

The Republican Party used to stand for something

Before the Republican Party was overtaken by extremists, tea baggers and Koch-funded campaign contributions, the Republican Party stood for something. The Republican Party stood for sensible policies that made sense for America.
 
 
 

Monday, September 16, 2013

This & that.....and Shameless GOP Hypocrisy




(M) Publicly they oppose it but secretly they're trying to benefit from it.

http://bit.ly/BeggingForObamacare


You won’t believe what The Nation magazine obtained through a Freedom of Information Act Inquiry: a list of 17 Republicans who secretly pursued Obamacare’s medicaid expansion dollars while hypocritically slamming the law in public, as well as all of their letters begging for the funds from the big, bad federal government.

Every single one of the Republican congresspeople listed below, including master hypocrite Paul Ryan, have voted over 30 times to repeal the law while privately begging for its funding from the federal government.

The Nation calls this behavior “shameless hypocrisy” as well as evidence “of the fact that the Affordable Care Act bestows tangible benefits that even congresses most extreme right wing ideologues are hard-pressed to deny to their constituents”.

While Tea Party Republicans literally believe “Obamacare” to be socialist Armageddon, some of their favorite representatives are making it clear that they are aware of the reality that the Affordable Care Act is a much-needed reform that will improve the life of millions of Americans, including their own constituents.

While the corporate dominated mainstream media is likely to ignore this story, it is up to us to make some noise about the incredible hypocrisy of these Republican Congress people that publicly denounced a wonderful reform and then turn around and beg for money for its implementation.
Please do your part by sharing this and other related articles on social media forums.
Read all of their hypocritical letters here.

Senators
Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson (R-TX)
Senator Saxby Chambliss (R-GA)
Senator Thad Cochran (R-MS)
Senator John Cornyn (R-TX)
Senator Mark Kirk (R-IL)
Senator Rob Portman (R-OH)
Senator Joe Lieberman (I-CT, recently joined conservative AEI)

Congress members:
Rep Mary Bono Mack (R-CA)
Rep Jerry Lewis (R-CA)
Rep. David Valadao (R-CA)
Rep John Barrow (R-GA)
Rep Johnny Isakson (R-GA)
Rep Gregg Harper (R-MS)
Rep Lee Terry (R-NE)
Rep Steve Pearce (R-NM)
Rep Bob Gibbs (R-OH)
Rep Kirsti Noem (R-SD)
Rep Michael McCaul (R-TX)
Rep Paul Ryan (R-WI) – his letter here

About Author

Omar Rivero
Omar Rivero is the Founder and Editor-In-Chief of Occupy Democrats. He studied Industrial Labor and Relations at Cornell University and earned a Masters in European Business from the European School of Management (ESCP-EAP). He uses voice dictation software to type articles and manage OD due to a degenerative nerve disorder. If something doesn't make sense, please try to "sound it out."
 
The Political Garbage Chute shared a photo.
























Sunday, September 1, 2013

Syria


In Syria, answering atrocity with atrocity should achieve more atrocity.
To What End Do We Kill?

Article image






Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Huh? Hypocrisy much?


Americans should receive disaster aid based on their need, not what state they're from

Three Republicans Who Opposed Sandy Relief Now Demand Disaster Aid For Arizona

By Josh Israel on August 14, 2013
 
Arizona Republicans Sen. Jeff Flake, Sen. John McCain, and Rep. Paul Gosar all voted against emergency relief funding after SuperStorm Sandy ravaged much of the New Jersey and New York area earlier this year. Now, following an Arizona wildfire, the same trio is vocally complaining that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is not doing enough to aid their state.

In light of sequestration and budget tightening, FEMA has limited funding and cannot respond to every single flood, fire, and other issue that hits. Last week, the agency announced that it would not declare Yarnell, Arizona, a federal disaster area. A spokesman explained that while the agency had assisted firefighters during the deadly June blaze, “the damage to uninsured private residences from this event was not beyond the response and recovery capabilities of the state/local governments, and voluntary agencies.”

McCain and Flake, who had partnered to ask for a federal disaster declaration, issued a joint statement Monday, lamenting that it was “a shame that FEMA couldn’t find it within their mission to help rebuild their homes and lives.” A riled McCain added that in light of the 19 firefighter deaths and the 134 destroyed homes, “the damage that was done was very substantial and, I believe, qualified. So, we’re going to do everything we can to urge the president to change his mind. Including, I will be making some phone calls.”

Gosar, who had also requested an emergency designation, released a statement of his own, saying, “The people of Yarnell do not ask much from the federal government,” but that here it was “reasonable to expect FEMA to step in.”

In January, the Senate passed a long-delayed $50.5 billion Sandy relief package, but among the 36 Senators voting against the bill were Flake and McCain. McCain criticized provisions in the bill that might not be spent immediately as “questionable” and argued “we cannot justify this type of spending.”

When the House gave its approval to the supplemental spending package, Gosar was among 180 Representatives voting no. At that time, he explained, “I am more than willing to support the people and businesses impacted by Hurricane Sandy, but that would not take over $50 billion taxpayer dollars.” But Gosar even voted against a barebones $9 billion funding increase for FEMA for Sandy relief — one of just 67 members to do so.

Gosar, a climate change denier, has blamed “extreme environmental groups” for Arizona’s many wildfires.


http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/08/14/2467861/three-arizona-republicans-fema-hypocrisy/

 
 
 

 

Monday, August 12, 2013

Show a Republican This to Expose Their Hypocrisy About Deficit Spending

Republicans don't want to know the TRUTH, but here are the FACTS......




Show a Republican This to Expose Their Hypocrisy About Deficit Spending
By

There’s a lot of rhetoric that comes from conservatives when it comes to President Obama.

I’ve never seen a man be accused of being so many different things, often accusations which completely contradict facts, logic and reality.

One of the accusations I always find most amusing is this “disgust” conservatives have with the spending under President Obama. My favorite right-wing catchphrase is “Obama has spent more than every other President in United States history—combined.”

Which is by far one of the dumbest things I’ve heard considering that basic knowledge of math easily disproves it. The national debt when he took office was $10.6 trillion, and it currently sits at $16.4 trillion. That’s an increase of $5.8 trillion, or as I like to call it—not greater than the $10.7 trillion he would have needed to spend to more than double our debt and “spend more than the combined totals of all other Presidents in United States history.”

Now don’t get me wrong, $5.8 trillion is a lot of money. But it’s also a number that has more than just what you see on face value, especially when you consider these people voted for George W. Bush—twice.

See, much of the money that Obama gets blamed for in 2009 was actually passed in 2008—under Bush. So if you take out the $1.4 trillion deficit we ran in 2009, which carried the budget passed in 2008 under President Bush, that puts Obama’s additions to our national debt at $4.4 trillion.



And contrary to what Republicans want you to believe, deficits are shrinking. In fact, our deficit for 2013 is projected to be almost $500 billion lower than it was in 2009. That’s nearly a 33% reduction in deficit spending in 4 years—under President Obama. But I’m sure you won’t hear that on Fox News.

Also, what’s never mentioned is the fact that much of the cost for both wars was hidden by using supplemental appropriations that bypassed Congress. When President Obama took office his administration finally put those costs on our books, which of course added to the deficits which get charged to him.

But what I like to look at is the hypocrisy of the “fiscal conservative” when it comes to spending.

They love to slam President Obama for his “out of control spending,” but they fail to mention that he took over a sinking economy and a national debt that had doubled the previous 8 years. We had to spend a lot of money to avoid sinking into another Great Depression with an economy that was on the brink of collapse—again, thanks to 8 years of Bush.

Let’s take a look at the list of yearly deficits under Bush:
  • 2002: -157,758 Billion (First year with a budget passed by Bush)
  • 2003: -377,585 Billion
  • 2004: -412,727 Billion
  • 2005: -318,346 Billion
  • 2006: -247,181 Billion
  • 2007: -160,701 Billion
  • 2008: -458,552 Billion
  • 2009: -1,412,688 Trillion (Last year with a budget passed by Bush)
And for fun, let’s also look at the 4 years prior to Bush, under President Clinton:
  • 1998: 69,270 Billion
  • 1999: 125,610 Billion
  • 2000: 236,241 Billion
  • 2001: 128,236 Billion
Notice what those numbers are lacking? It’s the negative sign before the number. That’s because our nation had a budget surplus, not a deficit. It took one budget passed under President Bush before he destroyed our surplus and sent us back into deficit spending.

And don’t give me the line, “Well Clinton had a Republican Congress.” Bush had a mostly Republican-controlled Congress for his entire 8 years as President. If the Republicans in Congress were responsible for our budget surpluses, they would have grown under Bush, not turned into giant deficits.

So it’s just laughable that these people act as if they suddenly care about spending, when the guy they voted for twice turned a budget surplus into giant deficits, doubled our national debt and destroyed our economy.

And this doesn’t even cover the Reagan years where we quadrupled our national debt and George H. Bush where we also added almost another $2 trillion to our national debt in just 4 years.

So the next time a conservative wants to harp about “out of control government spending,” simply ask them two questions:
  1. Did you vote for George W. Bush?
  2. Can you name a Republican President you voted for who actually balanced our budget?
Their answer to #1 will most likely be yes. Their answer to #2 can only be answered by those old enough to have voted for Dwight D. Eisenhower, considering he’s the last Republican President to actually balance our budget.

“Fiscally conservative Republicans”—a phrase that’s more like a punchline to a bad joke than anything close to a political reality.


http://www.forwardprogressives.com/show-a-republican-this-to-expose-their-hypocrisy-about-deficit-spending/