Search This Blog

Translate

Blog Archive

Middleboro Review 2

NEW CONTENT MOVED TO MIDDLEBORO REVIEW 2

Toyota

Since the Dilly, Dally, Delay & Stall Law Firms are adding their billable hours, the Toyota U.S.A. and Route 44 Toyota posts have been separated here:

Route 44 Toyota Sold Me A Lemon



Showing posts with label facts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label facts. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 10, 2019

Donald Trump stopping US government scientists from speaking out publicly is 'chilling'






Don the Con is beyond out of control. LOCK HIM UP!


The Trump administration’s decision to stop Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials and other government staff from speaking out publicly has prompted the country’s leading scientific organisation to warn against “censorship and intimidation”.
The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), the largest scientific society in the world, said many federal agencies had policies that “prohibit political interference” in how they relay information to the public.
And the World Resources Institute think tank said the move to stop the “free flow of information” would have a “chilling effect on staff”.

MORE:
LINK



DAN RATHER




As I think more about President Trump's outrageous speech on the environment, there were the usual features: distortions, misrepresentations, and of course outright lies. If I had submitted the text to my high school English teacher, she would have spilled so much red ink marking it up the paper would have looked like a crime scene. And indeed it was a crime, against facts, science, and the health of our planet.

But I was also struck by something else, which I think we are going to see a lot more of as the campaign heats up: cynicism.

There is no plausible way for a president who claims our climate crisis is a hoax, who demeans data and research, who stocks his administration with oil and gas lobbyists and seeks to undercut our sensitive and hard-fought environmental regulations, to credibly claim to be a steward of our planet. It is so farcical why even pretend? Because he and especially his advisors (otherwise known as enablers and opportunists) know their policies are deeply unpopular.

They know they are losing the political battle over climate and science, like they lost the battle over gay marriage. They can fire up the base as sure as they fire up a coal plant, but in the suburbs and among a growing number of younger and educated voters the polluters are on the wrong side of the electorate. The GOP will not win these voters in large margins, but they know they needs to cut into the lead the Democrats are building. So, the speech.

Expect President Trump to try to moderate his image, not in the cruelty, shortsightedness, or capriciousness of his policies, but in the words he uses. Much of this will be putting a lipstick of lies on the pig. The question is will he get away with it? Will the press say he's "moderating?" Will there be a false equivalence test with the Democratic nominee?

The good news is that a growing number of voters seem to be willing to vote on climate. The bad news is that we have the exact wrong president at the most crucial moment in this crisis. Will he be able to lie his way out of this while his cronies exploit the health of our planet for their financial gain, or will the American people hold him accountable?

I predict we will see a lot more of these kinds of tactics. Will the environment and the president's cynicism, a cynicism based on shameless lies, be at the heart of the framing for the upcoming election?








Thursday, June 6, 2019

FOCUS: Ai Weiwei | The West Is Complicit in the 30-Year Cover-Up of Tiananmen




Reader Supported News
05 June 19

If We Don’t Get Serious, June Will Be a Disaster
Traditionally, June is our best month for donations. Right now, donations are down 60% from one month ago.
If we do not put all of our energy into turning this around now, June may well be a total disaster.
In earnest.
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News
Sure, I'll make a donation!

Update My Monthly Donation


If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts
CA 95611





Reader Supported News
05 June 19
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


FOCUS: Ai Weiwei | The West Is Complicit in the 30-Year Cover-Up of Tiananmen 
A tank blocks a street in Beijing on June 6, 1989. (photo: Jacques Langevin/Getty)
Ai Weiwei, Guardian UK
Weiwei writes: "Why do autocratic and totalitarian regimes, in fact most forms of power, fear facts? The only reason is because they have built their power on unjust foundations." 

EXCERPT:

On 4 June, CNN’s 24-hour live broadcast conveyed the event and its developments to any audience that could receive its signal. I watched from New York. Viewers in New York probably witnessed a more comprehensive version of the incident than my family in Beijing. In New York, I organised and participated in many demonstrations of solidarity with the students in Tiananmen Square, protested before the Chinese consulate, and took part in a hunger strike at the United Nations.Why does a political power attempt to suppress reality? I have always wondered about totalitarian regimes’ fear of facts. As a political dissident, I insist on seeking the truth and resist attempts to change my memory of events. Because facts constitute the foundation of my understanding of the world. Upholding reality is a precondition for the mind to function. Otherwise, the world before us is disordered and chaotic; a world gone mad.





Tuesday, September 12, 2017

RSN: Garrison Keillor | Beauty Is Truth and Truth Is Factual





Reader Supported News
12 September 17
It's Live on the HomePage Now: 

Sure, I'll make a donation!

FOCUS: Garrison Keillor | Beauty Is Truth and Truth Is Factual
Garrison Keillor. (photo: A Prairie Home Companion)
Garrison Keillor, Portland Press Herald
Keillor writes: "Truth begins with facts. Facts are solid, like bricks. You build a house out of facts, the wolf won’t blow it down. But you drop a fact on your foot, it hurts."
READ MORE
How to Donate to Hurricane Victims and Avoid Scams
Jacey Fortin, The New York Times
Fortin writes: "As Hurricane Irma batters its way through the Caribbean and up toward southern Florida, here is a guide to how you can help the people it affects."
READ MORE

Contribute to RSN
Become a Fan of RSN on Facebook and Twitter
Update My Monthly Donation



Sunday, November 25, 2012

Social Security and Elderly Poverty

Let's stick to FACTS when the extremists propose cuts to Social Security.

Social Security and Elderly Poverty

Elderly poverty in the U.S. decreased dramatically during the twentieth century. Between 1960 and 1995, the official poverty rate of those aged 65 and above fell from 35 percent to 10 percent, and research has documented similarly steep declines dating back to at least 1939. While poverty was once far more prevalent among the elderly than among other age groups, today's elderly have a poverty rate similar to that of working-age adults and much lower than that of children.  Social Security is often mentioned as a likely contributor to the decline in elderly poverty. Enacted in 1935, the Social Security system experienced rapid benefit growth in the post-WWII era. In fact, there is a striking association between the rise in Social Security expenditures per capita and the decline in elderly poverty, as Figure 1 illustrates (with both series scaled to fit on the same figure).  This association is investigated further by researchers Gary Engelhardt and Jonathan Gruber in Social Security and the Evolution of Elderly Poverty, (NBER Working Paper 10466). Using data from the 1968 through 2001 March Current Population Surveys, the authors first examine aggregate trends in elderly poverty then conduct a statistical analysis to assess the role of Social Security in driving the decline in elderly poverty.


Figure 1


The authors draw several interesting conclusions from their analysis of aggregate trends. First, when poverty is measured relative to median non-elderly income rather than relative to the official poverty line, the decline in elderly poverty ended in the early 1980s. Income inequality has increased markedly since then among the elderly and non-elderly alike. Second, poverty rates are strongly cyclical - rising during recessions and falling during economic expansions - for the non-elderly but not for the elderly, highlighting the protective effect of Social Security. Third, decreases in elderly poverty over time have been similar across age groups but larger for married couples than for other groups. As the authors note, assessing the causal effect of Social Security on poverty is difficult. For example, individuals may work and save more when benefits are less generous, so a simple calculation of the increase in poverty that would result from eliminating Social Security income would likely overstate the true effect by ignoring these behavioral responses.  To avoid this problem, the authors construct a measure of Social Security benefits that depends only on the Social Security rules that apply to each birth cohort and not on workers' actual labor market experience. They examine the relationship between this measure and poverty rates for people born between 1880 and 1935. For some of the analysis, the authors focus on a narrower range of birth cohorts, making use of the sharp drop in benefits experienced by the "notch" cohorts of 1917-1921. The authors estimate that a $1,000 increase in Social Security benefits is associated with a 2 to 3 percentage point reduction in poverty rates for elderly households. They also find no statistically significant effect of benefits on income inequality, suggesting that higher-income and lower-income elderly benefit similarly from increases in Social Security.  Applying this estimate to the change in Social Security benefits between 1967 and 2000 suggests that the increase in benefits can explain all of the 17 percentage point decline in poverty that occurred during this period. The authors also find that higher benefits lead some elderly to live independently rather than with family members, and conclude that the effect of Social Security on poverty would have been even more dramatic in the absence of these changes in living arrangements.


http://www.nber.org/aginghealth/summer04/w10466.html

Saturday, November 17, 2012

Fiscal Policy: Stick to the Facts

It's difficult for the Tea Baggers to accept the FACTS, but Folks, it's time!
You want to be brain-washed, please do it on your own dime and let's restore fiscal sanity.
Thanks to Meme GOP for sharing this with us.

Read more facts about the "fiscal cliff" here: http://factcheck.org/2012/11/facts-falling-off-the-fiscal-cliff/
Thanks to @[429101477109798:274:Meme GOP] for sharing this with us.

Read more facts about the "fiscal cliff" here: http://factcheck.org/2012/11/facts-falling-off-the-fiscal-cliff/