FOCUS: Dan Rather | The Week Ahead Will Be Unprecedented

12 November 19

---

We are Asking for a 'Fair Shake' on Donations

We never believed that all the readers would donate all the time, nor do we expect it. We absolutely understand that extenuating circumstances happen. But less than 1% of the subscribers donating? That's not right or fair. We have no choice but to stand up and protest that. RSN was in fact built entirely with public funding. It's worth preserving.

Give us a hand once in a while.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!

---

Update My Monthly Donation

---

If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 95611

12 November 19

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News

URGENT AND IMMEDIATE REQUEST FOR DONATIONS - Far behind now on November donations. Fewer than 50 people have donated in the past 3 days, and most of those have been very small. Serious problems now. With urgency. / Marc Ash, Founder Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!

---

FOCUS: Dan Rather | The Week Ahead Will Be Unprecedented

Dan Rather, Dan Rather's Facebook Page
Rather writes: "We do not know what the week ahead will bring, but we do know it will be unprecedented. To be sure the specter of Nixon and Clinton hang over an impeachment process moving onto the public stage. This time, however, feels far different."

EXCERPT:

My mood is complicated. As a reporter, this a story unlike any in our history. I hope to do it justice. As an American citizen, however, I am struck by sadness, a deep, deep sadness, that we have come to this point. In previous times, we weren't being as driven apart by social media. What will that mean for these hearings? We didn't have a political party with its own propaganda operation, like we do with the President and Fox News. We didn't have such cravenness, such widespread stink of corruption, so much platently undemocratic instincts by those who have sworn an oath to the Constitution.

Yet despite all these obstructions to the process of justice, we are where we are because brave, patriotic Americans stood up and said what the President did was wrong. They will now say so in front of cameras, and posterity. The Democrats in the House, in contrast to the President's smokescreens, have largely comported themselves with restraint and a clear sense of purpose. It will be up to them to pierce the fog of deceit and paint a narrative that shapes public opinion.

READ MORE

---

Contribute to RSN

Update My Monthly Donation

Cantor "stands to profit from U.S. treasury default....

American Women United via Dawn Early-Olds

Just more proof that people like Cantor don't give a crap about our country, they only care about lining their own pockets!!! We really need to get these people out of office and fast.

Huffington Post:

 The resolution goes after Cantor's investment in ProShares Trust Ultrashort 20+ Year Treasury ETF, a fund that "takes a short position in long-dated government bonds."
 

The fund is essentially a bet against U.S. government bonds. If the debt ceiling is not raised and the United States defaults on its debts, the value of Cantor's fund would likely increase.

The Democratic resolution, obtained by The Huffington Post from a Democratic source on the Hill, argues that Cantor "stands to profit from U.S. treasury default, which thereby raises the appearance of a conflict of interest," and that he "may be sabotaging [debt ceiling] negotiations for his own personal gain."

 

Eric Cantor Hit By Democrats For Potentially Profiting From U.S. Default

 

Updated: 01/02/2013

 

WASHINGTON -- House Democrats are circulating a resolution accusing House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) of having a conflict of interest in the debt ceiling debate, a move that could provide an awkward C-SPAN moment for one of the lead Republicans in the budget negotiations.

The resolution goes after Cantor's investment in ProShares Trust Ultrashort 20+ Year Treasury ETF, a fund that "takes a short position in long-dated government bonds."

The fund is essentially a bet against U.S. government bonds. If the debt ceiling is not raised and the United States defaults on its debts, the value of Cantor's fund would likely increase.

The Democratic resolution, obtained by The Huffington Post from a Democratic source on the Hill, argues that Cantor "stands to profit from U.S. treasury default, which thereby raises the appearance of a conflict of interest," and that he "may be sabotaging [debt ceiling] negotiations for his own personal gain." It's not clear how widely the measure was being circulated, with a House Democratic aide saying they hadn't seen the resolution or heard it being discussed.

"Majority Leader Cantor has compromised the dignity and integrity of the Members of the House by raising the appearance of a conflict of interest in negotiations with the executive branch over raising the debt ceiling," adds the measure.

Cantor spokesman Brad Dayspring said Democrats have it backwards: The Majority Leader stands to lose much more money if Congress does not reach a deal on the debt ceiling and the U.S. defaults.

According to Dayspring, Cantor owns $3,327 in the ProShares trust. His congressional pension in the Thrift Savings Plan, on the other hand, is invested in the G Fund of government bonds and is valued at over $263,000. The value of his investment in the ProShares fund is highly variable and could change significantly if the government defaults.
 

"For the conspiracy theorists -- they would have to believe that Eric would want to lose hundreds of thousands of dollars to make a few thousands in return," said Dayspring. "Putting aside the lunacy of it all, he would lose hundreds of thousands of dollars if he did what they suggest."

"The insinuation is so outrageous that it shows a fundamental lack of understanding about how the markets work, how the U.S. economy works," he added. "Any member of Congress who would seriously identify themselves with this would reveal a complete inability to understand the United States economy and basic investing."

The resolution is a question of privilege, which deals with the rights, dignity, safety and integrity of the proceedings of the House of Representatives. It has direct access to the floor, meaning that at any time, a lawmaker can rise and question the privileges of the House and offer a resolution. It must then be read in its entirety, as soon as it is presented.

The resolution is unlikely to be ruled valid by the parliamentarian, but it could certainly create an uncomfortable bit of political theater when it's read.

"Given the language in this resolution, obviously that would be incendiary, if you chose the right moment," said a House Democratic aide who added that right now, it appeared the party was still shopping around for a member willing to put it on the floor.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/08/eric-cantor-conflict-interest-debt-limit_n_893354.html