Put all of the puzzle pieces together and you get GOP RIGGED ELECTIONS!
The Census Bureau is underfunded, inadequately prepared and will produce a bogus census.
Crosscheck will purge valid voters to create Jim Crow flawed voting lists.
Sinclair media consolidation will create Fox News = Fake News on steroids.
Just a few articles below....there's far more!
Does No One Care That 7 Million Votes Were Not Counted?
How Trump's Nationwide Voter Data Request Could Lead to Voter Suppression
Researchers have found that Crosscheck's matching algorithms are highly inaccurate. A recent working paper by researchers at Stanford, the University of Pennsylvania, Harvard and Microsoft found that Crosscheck's algorithm returns about 200 false positives for every one legitimate instance of double registration it finds.
Is the census heading for a crisis?
A Massive Election-Rigging Scandal Gave Trump the White House. But the Media Has Ignored It.
Greg Palast: Cross Check- Motherlode of Vote Purge Scams
Greg Palast | Trump Picks Al Capone of Vote Rigging to Investigate Federal Voter Fraud
Greg Palast | Republican States Send Voter Information Files to Kobach, Even While Claiming They Will "Resist" His Demand
Voter lists from Mississippi, and twenty-seven other states, were turned over to Kobach beginning years ago as part of a voter-list purge program called "Interstate Crosscheck," Hunter explains. The list aims to identify Americans registered in more than one state and intending to vote twice in one election, which is a crime. Any names identified as potential double-voters receives a postcard which, if unanswered, could lead to removal from the rolls.
The Best Democracy Money Can Buy Teaser
Greg Palast: By Rejecting Recount, Is Michigan Covering Up 75,000 Ballots Never Counted?
Kris Kobach, known as the King of Voter Suppression, has worked with Crosscheck to successfully disenfranchise voters....mostly African Americans. Is it a surprise he was put in charge of a massive American voter purge?
It doesn’t take a Russian to hack an American election
Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman | Jim Crow GOP Steals Another Election as Brain Dead Democrats and Media Say Nothing
Michigan GOP leaders, after rigging state for Donald Trump, try to blame Detroit poll workers
This Hacker Rigged Elections in 9 Latin American Countries
The Sinclair takeover of MEDIA:
John Oliver Warns of Conservative Takeover of Unbiased Local News
15 July 17 PM
Sure, I'll make a donation!
White House Releases Sensitive Personal Information of Voters Worried About Their Sensitive Personal Information
Christopher Ingraham, The Washington Post
Ingraham writes: "The White House on Thursday made public a trove of emails it received from voters offering comment on its Election Integrity Commission."
READ MORE
Voters stand in line to cast their ballots. (photo: AP)
he White House on Thursday made public a trove of emails it received from voters offering comment on its Election Integrity Commission. The commission drew widespread criticism when it emerged into public view by asking for personal information, including addresses, partial social security numbers and party affiliation, on every voter in the country.
It further outraged voters by planning to post that information publicly.
Voters directed that outrage toward the Trump White House and the voter commission, often using profanity-laced language in the 112 pages of emails released this week.
“You will open up the entire voting population to a massive amount of fraud if this data is in any way released,” one voter wrote.
“Many people will get their identity stolen, which will harm the economy,” wrote another.
“I respectfully request, as an American-born citizen legally eligible to vote for two decades, that you leave my voter data and history alone, do not publish it, and do nothing with it,” said another.
Unfortunately for these voters and others who wrote in, the Trump administration did not redact any of their personal information from the emails before releasing them to the public. In some cases, the emails contain not only names, but email addresses, home addresses, phone numbers and places of employment of people worried about such information being made available to the public.
The Washington Post is not publishing any of this information because in most cases it does not appear that the individuals were aware their comments would be shared by the White House. The emails were sent to the Election Integrity Commissions' email address that the administration asked U.S. secretaries of state to send data files to.
“This request is very concerning,” wrote one. “The federal government is attempting to get the name, address, birth date, political party, and social security number of every voter in the country.” That email, published by the White House, contained the sender's name and home address.
“DO NOT RELEASE ANY OF MY VOTER DATA PERIOD,” wrote one voter whose name and email address was published by the White House.
“Beefed up the security on this email address yet?” asked another voter whose name and email address were also published by the White House.
“The request for private voter information is offensive,” wrote one voter whose name, home address and email address were published by the White House.
“I removed my name from voter rolls. And I'm a Republican!” wrote one voter whose name was published by the White House.
Federal agencies often solicit and release public comments on proposed legislation. Regulations.gov, the federal government's clearing house for public comments, includes a detailed set of guidelines explaining how to submit comments, what type of personal information is collected and how that information may be used.
“Some agencies may require that you include personal information, such as your name and email address, on the comment form,” the website explains. The Securities and Exchange Commission, for instance, warns commenters to “submit only information that you wish to make available publicly.”
Similarly, the Federal Trade Commission tells commenters that “published comments include the commenter’s last name and state/country as well as the entire text of the comment. Please do not include any sensitive or confidential information.”
The White House does not appear to have issued any such public guidelines or warnings before many of the emails were sent.
"These are public comments, similar to individuals appearing before commission to make comments and providing name before making comments," said Marc Lotter, Press Secretary to Mike Pence, in an email. "The Commission’s Federal Register notice asking for public comments and its website make clear that information 'including names and contact information' sent to this email address may be released."
The Federal Register notice soliciting comments was published on July 5. The White House page was published on July 13.
Approximately half of the emails published by the White House were dated prior to July 5.
http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/44691-white-house-releases-sensitive-personal-information-of-voters-worried-about-their-sensitive-personal-information
Contribute to RSN
Update My Monthly Donation
No comments:
Post a Comment