Search This Blog

Translate

Blog Archive

Middleboro Review 2

NEW CONTENT MOVED TO MIDDLEBORO REVIEW 2

Toyota

Since the Dilly, Dally, Delay & Stall Law Firms are adding their billable hours, the Toyota U.S.A. and Route 44 Toyota posts have been separated here:

Route 44 Toyota Sold Me A Lemon



Showing posts with label Trump: Anti-Science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trump: Anti-Science. Show all posts

Sunday, November 5, 2017

Incoming EPA Advisor Says US Air Is Too Clean






Reader Supported News
04 November 17 PM
It's Live on the HomePage Now: 
Reader Supported News



Like Robert Phalen, many are expected to argue for less regulation, an agenda that is backed by EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt. (photo: Science Focus)
Like Robert Phalen, many are expected to argue for less regulation, an agenda that is backed by
 EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt. (photo: Science Focus)


Incoming EPA Advisor Says US Air Is Too Clean

By Summer Meza, Newsweek
04 November 17

ne of the new White House appointees to a critical environmental panel once said that the air these days is just too clean to promote good health.
Robert Phalen, an air pollution researcher at the Irvine campus of the University of California, said in 2012 that children need to breathe irritants so that their bodies learn how to ward them off.
“Modern air,” he told the American Association for the Advancement of Science, “is a little too clean for optimum health.”
Phalen is one of 17 new appointees to the Environmental Protection Agency's Scientific Advisory Board, which helps develop environmental policy. Other nominees include scientists from the oil industry, a chemical industry trade association, and various universities and consulting groups.
Like Phalen, many are expected to argue for less regulation, an agenda that is backed by EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt.
But Phalen's earlier comments drew renewed interest in his career as a researcher and an opponent of air pollution-related regulations. Much like President Donald Trump, Phalen prides himself on holding unpopular opinions, like his 2004 study that air pollution is not such a big deal.
“The relative risks associated with modern [particulate matter] are very small and confounded by many factors,” Phalen wrote. “Neither toxicology studies nor human clinical investigations have identified the components and/or characteristics of [particulate matter] that might be causing the health-effect associations.”
Phalen also received heat after he defended his use of dogs to test the effects of air pollution on lung health on "The Oprah Winfrey Show" in the 1980s—a controversial stance he maintained in several radio and television interviews.
"My most important role in science is causing trouble and controversy," he said in the 2012 interview.
The Trump Administration has moved quickly to assert its control over the EPA's science team. Several members of the advisory panel were dismissed in May, part of the EPA's anti-regulatory agenda and shift to hearing more voices from business and industry, said some departed members of the panel. President Trump directed Pruitt to cut the EPA budget by 40 percent, and to roll back regulations on clean water protection and climate change prevention. The official EPA website also deleted pages that included climate change research.
More recently, Pruitt announced that no scientist who received funding from the agency would be eligible to serve on the advisory board, a move that blocks hundreds of credible scientists from the panel. Pruitt said the move would prevent conflicts of interest, but critics say it's a false issue.
“They pretend that the industry people who are being offered up positions on the panel are somehow unbiased because they’re not getting money from EPA,” Donna Kenski of the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium in Illinois told the New York Times. Kenski was dismissed from a clean air advisory board earlier in the week, the Times reported.


Become a Fan of RSN on Facebook and Twitter


Saturday, October 14, 2017

Tragic commentary of Republican Supporters!




The catastrophic failures of Republican Texas Governance in the Hurricane aftermath defined the consequences of lack of regulation and planning - streets flooded with sewage waste, Super Fund cleanup sites flooded spewing toxic chemicals, unregulated chemical plant fires spewing toxic fumes sickening First Responders, streets flooded because of the failures to regulate and plan, homes built in low lying flood plains  and much else. 

Perpetuating Ignorance, denying science has become a pathetic Republican Platform.

Tragic commentary of Republican Supporters!



Reader Supported News
14 October 17

We have a unique problem. A large dedicated audience that is averse to supporting the project. While there may be reasons, good and bad, the net effect is a constant headache for everyone.
To expect that 1% of the subscribers would respond to the funding appeals seems like a modest aspiration.
We are going to have to find a way to raise the level of participation. You apparently rely on RSN, and we clearly rely on you.
Need to find a way to make this work.
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

Become a Fan of RSN on Facebook and Twitter


If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 95611




Kathleen Hartnett White arrived at Trump Tower last November while then-President-Elect Donald Trump and his transition team considered positions in the administration. (photo: Drew Angerer/Getty)
Kathleen Hartnett White arrived at Trump Tower last November while then-President-Elect Donald Trump and his transition team considered positions in the administration. (photo: Drew Angerer/Getty)

Trump Pick for Top Environment Post: Carbon Dioxide Is 'The Gas of Life'

By Marianne Lavelle, InsideClimate News
13 October 17

Kathleen Hartnett White is an unabashed defender of fossil fuels who has argued against the endangerment finding and the Endangered Species Act.

resident Donald Trump has picked Kathleen Hartnett White, a former Texas regulator and unapologetic advocate of expanding U.S. fossil fuel production regardless of carbon dioxide emissions, for the top White House environment post.
Putting her in charge of the Council on Environmental Quality, which has been rudderless since Trump took office, would place an extreme denier of mainstream climate science, a hero of those who oppose urgent action on global warming, at the fulcrum of federal interagency policy discussions on energy and environmental matters.
White has argued against the federal government's "endangerment finding" that carbon dioxide, the principal greenhouse gas feeding worldwide climate change, is a danger to human health and the environment. If confirmed to head the White House Council on Environmental Quality, she would be coordinating environmental efforts across the federal agencies.
As a fellow of the conservative Austin-based think tank, the Texas Public Policy Foundation, White leaves a long paper trail that will surely be fodder for her confirmation hearing. The group has been funded by fossil fuel interests, including Exxon and the Koch brothers.
She has decried regulation of carbon dioxide, which she calls "the gas of life," and co-authored last year's paean to the fracking boom, "Fueling Freedom: Exposing the Mad War on Energy." Her co-author, economist Stephen Moore, founded the Club for Growth, the political action group that weaponized the primary process to successfully move the Republican party to the right over the past two decades.
"An invisible, harmless trace gas in the Earth's atmosphere, CO2 is a plant food," White said last year in a Q&A with the Orlando Sentinel.
In her 2014 monograph, "Fossil Fuels: The Moral Case," she wrote: "Humanity's use of fossil fuels has released whole populations from abject poverty. ... Until energy sources fully comparable or superior to fossil fuels are securely available, policies to reduce emissions of CO2 should proceed with caution lest they prematurely exhaust the well-springs of mankind's greatest advance."
She has also promoted tactics for undermining the Endangered Species Act, claiming its protections for endangered wildlife imperil prosperity.
In its announcement Thursday of Trump's intent to nominate White, the White House highlighted her role on the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (2001-2007) and as a former director of the Lower Colorado River Authority.  
White's appointment to a top position in the administration has long been rumored; she met with the president-elect in Trump Tower while he was mulling his choice for Environmental Protection Agency administrator. But her supporters betrayed no sense of disappointment when Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt was named to that post instead.
At an energy policy summit that the Texas Public Policy Foundation co-hosted with the Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C., last December, the group's president Brooke Rollins, said she expected that there would be "something very special" ahead for White in the Trump administration.




Sunday, May 14, 2017

Progressive Breakfast: What's At Stake When We Talk About Healthcare







MORNING MESSAGE

Julie Chinitz
What's At Stake When We Talk About Healthcare
All across the country, citizens at town hall meetings are asking hard questions to the 217 Republicans like New York's John Faso and Elise Stefanik who voted in Congress to repeal Obamacare and cut back People's Action's Julie Chinitz offers some advice about how to talk with our leaders, family, friends and neighbors about what's at stake in the battle for healthcare.

Rollbacks and Paybacks

EPA dismisses half of key board’s scientific advisers; Interior suspends more than 200 advisory panels. WaPo: “Both the Environmental Protection Agency and the Interior Department are overhauling a slew of outside advisory boards that inform how their agencies assess the science underpinning policies, the first step in a broader effort by Republicans to change the way the federal government evaluates the scientific basis for its regulations.”
FCC bends rules to green light Sinclair Network’s epic expansion. Common Dreams: “Creating the nation’s largest local TV station conglomerate… conservative Sinclair Broadcast Group announced Monday it will buy Tribune Media for $3.9 billion. ‘Sure looks like a quid pro quo: friendly coverage and full employment for ex-Trump mouthpieces in exchange for a green light to get as big as Sinclair wants’.”
CHOICE Act starts rollback of Dodd-Frank financial reforms. IBT: “The bill, which committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R- Tex.) introduced April 26 as “an alternative to the failed Dodd-Frank Act,” eliminates a litany of measures that were meant to prevent a repeat of the 2008 financial crisis…In addition to bankrolling the campaigns of the lawmakers involved, financial industry firms and trade associations collectively spent millions on lobbying efforts related at least in part to the CHOICE Act in the first quarter of 2017.”

Chilling Dissent

Oklahoma governor signs anti-protest law. The Intercept: “A statute aimed at suppressing protests against oil and gas pipelines has been signed into law in Oklahoma, as a related bill advances through the state legislature. The two bills are part of a nationwide trend in anti-protest laws meant to significantly increase legal penalties for civil disobedience. The Oklahoma law signed this week is unique, however, in its broad targeting of groups “conspiring” with protesters accused of trespassing. It takes aim at environmental organizations Republicans have blamed for anti-pipeline protests that have become costly for local governments.”
Trumpcare advocates resort to lies to promote bill. Think Progress: “Price insisted that the proposed system will allow ‘greater flexibility so that more resources could be put to the seniors and disabled and appropriate resources could be put to the healthy moms and kids in a medicaid system.’ He did not explain how less money will create more flexibility, and he later claimed again — falsely — that ‘there are no cuts to the Medicaid program.'”

More from OurFuture.org:

Trump Tax Plan Creates Incentives For Evaders. Gil Manzon & Tim Gray: “The Trump administration wants to change the way the government taxes so-called pass-through entities. In a nutshell, the Trump proposal would dramatically lower the rates this category of filers pay. This would lead to very creative tax planning at best and outright evasion at worst, while prompting more companies to adopt this type of business structure to gain the huge benefits.”
Neoliberalism Defeats NeoFascism in France, for Now. Miles Mogulescu: “Neoliberal Emmanuel Macron has defeated neofascist Marine Le Pen to become France’s next president. That’s good news, but since neoliberalism is part of what has fueled Le Pen’s rise, it’s too early to break out the Beaujolais.”
Progressive Breakfast is a daily morning email highlighting news stories of interest to activists. Progressive Breakfast and OurFuture.org are projects of People's Action.more »



Wednesday, April 5, 2017

9 States Just Filed A Federal Lawsuit Against Trump







9 States Just Filed A Federal Lawsuit Against Trump


In addition, the standards would “cut 292 million tons of greenhouse gas pollution, 734 thousand tons of the pollution that creates soot and smog, 1.2 million tons of the potent climate change pollutant methane, and over 1,000 pounds of highly-toxic mercury, over a 30 year period.”
It would seem counterintuitive to block the implementation of these efficiency standards – surely saving money and energy is a good thing? – but little that the Trump administration says or does makes sense. It appears that Trump would rather throw public money down the drain and pollute the atmosphere than force corporations to spend a little extra money.
Attorney General Schneiderman slammed the Trump administration’s illogical decision and vowed to fight it at every turn in this scathing statement:
“Energy efficiency standards are vital to public health, our environment, and consumers. This is yet another example of how the Trump administration’s polluter-first energy policy has real and harmful impacts on the public health, environment – and pocketbooks – of New Yorkers. By blocking these common sense standards, the administration is reversing progress in cleaning the air we breathe and fighting climate change – and denying consumers and businesses some $24 billion in savings. I will continue to use the full force of my office to compel the Trump administration to live up to its obligations to the law and the people of New York.”
The root of the lawsuit lies in the assertion that the Trump Administration’s delay of efficiency standard implementation is a violation of the Environmental Policy and Conservation Act’s “anti-backsliding” provisions.
With Trump and his corporate cronies engaging in a full-on war against science, the existence of climate change, and the health of the environment, it is reassuring to see that our officials at the state level are taking a stand against Trump’s tyranny.

http://occupydemocrats.com/2017/04/03/9-states-just-filed-federal-lawsuit-trump/



Wednesday, March 29, 2017

RSN: William Boardman | Impeachable Offenses Announced Live on TV - by President Trump!



It's Live on the HomePage Now: 
Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!

William Boardman | Impeachable Offenses Announced Live on TV - by President Trump! 
Flanked by HHS Secretary Tom Price and Vice President Pence, Donald Trump reacts after Republicans abruptly pulled their health care bill from the House floor. (photo: Getty) 
William Boardman, Reader Supported News 
Boardman writes: "Obamacare was a rickety compromise with a Rube Goldberg structure trying to satisfy mutually exclusive goals, one of which was NOT universal health care coverage. But still it managed to insure some 20 million Americans who were previously without health care insurance." 
READ MORE
Trump Administration Sought to Block Sally Yates From Testifying to Congress on Russia 
Devlin Barrett and Adam Entous, The Washington Post 
Excerpt: "The Trump administration sought to block former acting attorney general Sally Yates from testifying to Congress in the House investigation of links between Russian officials and Donald Trump's presidential campaign, The Washington Post has learned." 
READ MORE
Border Agents Beat Undocumented Immigrant to Death. The US Is Paying His Family $1 Million. 
Cleve R. Wootson Jr., The Washington Post 
Wootson Jr. writes: "The United States settled a lawsuit with Hernandez's estate last month, agreeing to dole out $1 million to his five children and his common-law wife, Maria Puga. Still, none of the agents involved have been fired or disciplined or 'lost a dime of pay,' for a beating that broke five of Hernandez's ribs, damaged his spine and ultimately killed him." 
READ MORE
White House Refuses to Condemn Murder of Black Man by White Supremacist 
Judd Legum, ThinkProgress 
Legum writes: "James Harris Jackson, a 28-year-old white supremacist from Baltimore, traveled to New York City and brutally murdered Timothy Caughman, a 66-year-old black man, with a sword." 
READ MORE
Five Ways Cybersecurity Will Suffer If Congress Repeals the FCC Privacy Rules 
Peter Eckersley and Jeremy Gillula, Electronic Frontier Foundation 
Excerpt: "Last Thursday, Republicans in the Senate voted to repeal [internet privacy] rules. If the House of Representatives votes the same way and the rules are repealed, it's pretty obvious that the results for Americans' privacy will be disastrous. But what many people don't realize is that Americans' cybersecurity is also at risk." 
READ MORE
Argentina Set to Drop $2 Billion for Largest Weapons Acquisition in 40 Years 
teleSUR 
Excerpt: "Argentina President Mauricio Macri is poised to dole out US$2 billion in large military equipment from the United States in what will be the biggest weapons acquisition since the country's Malvinas War in the 1980s, according to a report by local outlet El Destape." 
READ MORE
I am an Arctic Researcher. Donald Trump Is Deleting My Citations 
Victoria Herrmann, Guardian UK 
Herrmann writes: "As an Arctic researcher, I'm used to gaps in data. Just over 1% of US Arctic waters have been surveyed to modern standards. Over the past two months though, I've been navigating a different type of uncharted territory: the deleting of what little data we have by the Trump administration." 
READ MORE

Contribute to RSN
Become a Fan of RSN on Facebook and Twitter








Monday, March 27, 2017

RSN: Trump to Issue Executive Order Broadly Enabling Fossil Fuel Polluters





It's Live on the HomePage Now: 
Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!


Trump to Issue Executive Order Broadly Enabling Fossil Fuel Polluters 
Jennifer A. Dlouhy, Bloomberg 
Dlouhy writes: "President Donald Trump is set to sign a sweeping executive order on Tuesday aimed at promoting domestic oil, coal and natural gas by reversing much of his predecessor's efforts to address climate change." 
READ MORE

Trump has called climate change a hoax. (photo: David McNew/Getty Images)
Trump has called climate change a hoax. (photo: David McNew/Getty Images)

Trump to Issue Executive Order Broadly Enabling Fossil Fuel Polluters

By Jennifer A. Dlouhy, Bloomberg
27 March 17

resident Donald Trump is set to sign a sweeping executive order on Tuesday aimed at promoting domestic oil, coal and natural gas by reversing much of his predecessor’s efforts to address climate change -- prompting warnings the action will undermine U.S. leadership on the issue.
The document lays out a broad blueprint for the Trump administration to dismantle the architecture that former President Barack Obama built to combat the phenomenon, according to details shared with Bloomberg News. Some of the changes would happen immediately, while others would take years to complete.
"He’s trying to undo more than a decade of progress in fighting climate change and protecting public health,” David Doniger, director of the climate and clean air program at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said in an email. “But nobody voted to abandon America’s leadership in climate action and the clean-energy revolution. This radical retreat will meet a great wall of opposition.”
The order will compel federal agencies to quickly identify any actions that could burden the production or use of domestic energy resources, including nuclear power, and then work to suspend, revise or rescind the policies unless they are legally mandated, are necessary for the public interest or promote development. 
Pro-Growth
It also will toss out two Obama-era directives that gave consideration of climate change a prominent role in federal rule making. One advised government agencies to factor climate change into environmental reviews, such as those governing where oil drilling should take place. The other, called the “social cost of carbon,” is a metric reflecting the potential economic damage from climate change that was used by the Obama administration to justify a suite of regulations.
“This is about making sure that we have a pro-growth and pro-environment approach to how we do regulation in this country,” Scott Pruitt, the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, said on ABC’s "This Week” program on Sunday.
Trump, who has called climate change a hoax, has vowed to reorient the government so that U.S. oil and coal producers thrive and steel and auto manufacturers don’t face “job-killing restrictions.” The coming order underscores Trump’s commitment to make good on his campaign promises, which helped propel him to victory in industrial strongholds such as West Virginia and Pennsylvania.
The details shared with Bloomberg News reflected the latest draft of the White House order and could change before the announcement, which Pruitt said would happen Tuesday.
Coal Jobs
Some analysts question whether reversing the rules can save coal miner jobs. Killing the Clean Power Plan is not enough to spark a coal revival and avert a wave of planned retirements of power plants using the fossil fuel, said Kevin Book, an analyst with Washington-based research firm ClearView Energy.
"Even without the Clean Power Plan, there are still 14 gigawatts of coal retirements related to" a mercury pollution rule "and market dynamics waiting in the wings," Book said.  
While the White House order will make clear that the target of the planned regulatory rollback should be on policies curbing the production of oil, natural gas, coal and nuclear energy, it also will say the U.S. is well served when affordable, reliable and clean electricity is produced from an array of sources, including solar, wind and hydropower.
The order also is set to include a targeted assault on a handful of specific Obama-era regulations. It will require the Interior Department to lift a moratorium on the sale of new coal leases on federal land and compel the EPA to review, and, “if appropriate,” begin proceedings to suspend, revise or rescind regulations designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from power plants.
Clean Power Plan
Obama’s Clean Power Plan was designed to cut carbon dioxide emissions from electricity by 32 percent by 2030 compared to 2005 levels. The initiative has been in legal limbo since the Supreme Courtstayed it while it was reviewed by a federal appeals court. The Trump administration now is expected ask that court to put the matter on hold to allow it time to revise or undo the measure -- an action environmentalists have vowed to challenge.
Other policies in the cross hairs: an EPA rule setting requirements for greenhouse gas emissions for construction of new power plants and an Interior Department regulation setting mandates on hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas wells on federal lands. The Interior Department’s Bureau of Land Management said earlier this month it would begin the process to rescind the regulation, which requires companies to disclose the chemicals they pump underground and to seal off waste water in storage tanks.
Revoking Directives
Trump’s executive order also is set to revoke six specific directives from his predecessor, including Obama’s broad strategy for paring emissions of methane released from oil and gas operations. Other Obama directives targeted for repeal include one on climate change and national security, as well as a pair of directives from June 2013 that laid out his climate plans.
The Obama administration wove climate considerations into decisions across the federal bureaucracy, from efficiency standards for microwave ovens to the refurbishing of government buildings.
The changes may have little immediate impact on the market for coal, which is facing stiff competition from cheaper natural gas and renewable energy, analysts say.
Even before the Obama administration imposed the coal-leasing moratorium in January 2016, producers had little interest in adding new federal reserves to their portfolios amid slumping domestic demand. The U.S. government has sold just one coal leases since October 2012, though earlier this month it approved a transaction originally sought in 2005. Existing federal leases contain at least 20 years’ worth of coal, according to Interior Department estimates.
Coal’s Decline
Even without the EPA’s Clean Power Plan in force because of the Supreme Court stay, using coal to generate electricity has been in decline as a result of previous pollution regulations and competition from low-cost natural gas, solar and wind.
The removal of the Clean Power Plan could halt coal’s decline as a source of electricity during the next two decades, according to projections from the Energy Information Administration. More coal use would mean less natural gas use, EIA said.
Trump’s action sets in motion at least a year of bureaucratic work at the EPA to formally dismantle the Clean Power Plan. And whatever happens will inevitably be challenged in court by those same environmental groups.
By contrast, the Interior Department can undo the coal leasing moratorium with the stroke of a pen, the same way it was imposed a year ago, under an administrative order issued by former Interior Secretary Sally Jewell.
Trump’s targets would also reduce the role of climate change in government decision-making. For instance, the social cost of carbon metric served as the linchpin for many Obama administration environmental rules. Critics say the number -- now nearly $40 for every metric ton of carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere -- gives artificial precision to uncertain conditions nearly 300 years in the future.
According to shared details of the executive order, the Trump administration will disband the working group that created the social cost of carbon and return to an earlier 2003 approach for calculating the costs and benefits of proposed regulations.

http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/42697-trump-to-issue-executive-order-broadly-enabling-fossil-fuel-polluters