Another Republican wacko endorsed by Romney --
Mourdock apologizes for ‘misinterpretation’ of rape
comments, Obama campaign pounces
Posted by Aaron Blake and Chris Cillizza on October 24, 2012
Indiana Republican Senate candidate Richard Mourdock on Wednesday insisted his
comments about rape and pregnancy were being willfully misinterpreted for
political gain even as President Obama’s campaign sought to ensnare Mitt Romney
in the growing controversy.
VIDEO: Richard Mourdock: ‘I
don’t think God wants rape’
“If there was any interpretation other than what I intended, I really regret
that,” Mourdock said in an midday press conference in the Hoosier State. He
added: “Anyone who goes to the video tape and views that understands fully what
I meant.”
Mourdock’s explanation will likely do little to quiet the national firestorm
created by his initial comments at a debate Tuesday night; “I think even when
life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God
intended to happen,” he said. (The full video of Mourdock’s comments is at the
bottom of this post.)
In fact, even before Mourdock sought to clarify his comments, President
Obama’s campaign was working to hang those remarks around Romney’s ankles.
“This is a reminder that a Republican Congress working with a Republican
president Mitt Romney would (feel) that women should not be able to make choices
about their own health care,” Obama spokeswoman Jen Psaki said Wednesday
morning. To further drive that point home, the
Democratic
National Committee released a web video splicing Mourdock’s rape comments
with Romney’s full-throated endorsement of him.
Romney, sensing danger to his growing momentum and to his attempts to court
suburban women, sought to quickly distance himself from Mourdock’s comments.
“Governor Romney disagrees with Richard Mourdock’s comments, and they do not
reflect his views,” Romney spokeswoman Andrea Saul said in a statement Tuesday
night. But on Wednesday, Saul said that Romney would not rescind his endorsement
of Mourdock or ask that the
recent
endorsement ad he cut for the Indiana Republican be removed from the
airwaves.
But while Romney distanced himself from Mourdock, National Republican
Senatorial Committee Chairman John Cornyn (R-Texas) gave the party’s nominee a
vote of support.
“Richard and I, along with millions of Americans – including even (Mourdock’s
Democratic opponent) Joe Donnelly – believe that life is a gift from God,”
Cornyn said. “To try and construe his words as anything other than a restatement
of that belief is irresponsible and ridiculous.”
While about half of Americans oppose abortion, many who do also support
exceptions in the case of rape and incest.
Mourdock, who beat longtime Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) in a primary earlier
this year, is locked in a tight race with Donnelly despite Indiana’s Republican
lean. Republicans note that Donnelly also opposes abortion rights and
was
a co-sponsor in the House of a bill that would have denied abortion funding
for victims of rape and incest and created a separate category called “forcible
rape.” The bill was soon amended to eliminate the “forcible rape” designation,
which Donnelly said
he
didn’t know was included in the original bill. Republicans believe they can
level the playing field — at least somewhat — by pointing to Donnelly’s
involvement in that controversial bill.
For the national GOP, it’s a potential case of deja vu. The party’s chances
in the Missouri Senate race plummeted when newly minted nominee Rep. Todd Akin
remarked in August that “legitimate rape” rarely causes pregnancy.
Akin has since apologized for the comment but is struggling both in the polls
and in fundraising. GOP leaders tried unsuccessfully to push him out of the race
so they could get a different candidate.
If the GOP loses the Senate races in Indiana and Missouri, its path back to a
Senate majority becomes very difficult.
Romney — and Republicans more broadly — have worked hard in recent weeks to
push back against Democratic allegations that they are waging a “war on women”
because of the policies they pursue. The Mourdock controversy is likely to
re-ignite that debate just 13 days before the election.
VIDEO: Mourdock makes
controversial comments during a debate Tuesday night.
Read more from PostPolitics
The
Fix: Is Richard Mourdock the new Todd Akin?
Sheldon
Adelson: A man of many motives
Gloria
Allred’s October surprise?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2012/10/24/mourdock-god-intended-for-babies-to-result-from-rape/?wpisrc=nl_pmpolitics