RSN: House Republicans Will Ring in the New Year With a Plan to Permanently Cripple Government

It's Live on the HomePage Now: 
Reader Supported News

---

Michael Moore | It's Working People Like My Uncle That Built the Middle Class, and It's Wall Street That Destroyed It 
 
Michael Moore, Michael Moore's Facebook Page 
Moore writes: "80 years ago tonight my uncle and hundreds of other workers in Flint took over the General Motors factories and held them for 44 days until the company recognized their union, the UAW." 
READ MORE

Paul Ryan. (photo: Tom Williams/AP)

House Republicans Will Ring in the New Year With a Plan to Permanently Cripple Government 
Ian Millhiser, ThinkProgress 
Millhiser writes: "House Republicans think Washington is just too nimble and too able to respond to unanticipated complications - and they've got a plan to nip that problem in the bud." 
READ MORE

They want to break it so badly it can’t be fixed again.

ouse Republicans think Washington is just too nimble and too able to respond to unanticipated complications— and they’ve got a plan to nip that problem in the bud.

The incoming House majority plans to schedule a vote on the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act (REINS Act) soon after new members are sworn in next Tuesday. A top priority of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the leading lobby group for big business, REINS would fundamentally alter the federal government in ways that could hobble federal agencies during periods when the same party controls Congress and the White House — and absolutely cripple those agencies during periods of divided government.

Many federal laws delegate authority to agencies to work out the details of how to achieve relatively broad objectives set by the law itself. The agencies do so by drafting regulations that interpret and elaborate upon these statutes and which have the force of law. REINS, however, effectively strips agencies of much of this authority.

To understand why this matters, consider one such federal law:

The Clean Air Act, for example, requires the Environmental Protection Agency to set “standards applicable to the emission of any air pollutant from any class or classes of new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines” if the EPA determines that those emissions “cause, or contribute to, air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.”

There are many reasons why Congress may wish to delegate authority in this way. The EPA employs scientists and policy experts who have far more expertise in motor vehicle emissions than members of Congress, so the EPA is more likely to make educated judgments about the details of environmental policy. New studies may reveal that a particular emission that was previously viewed as benign is actually far more dangerous — or they may reveal the opposite, that a chemical once viewed as dangerous is actually much less so. The Clean Air Act permits the EPA to respond relatively nimbly to these developments rather than having to push through new legislation every time a researcher publishes new data that should inform regulators. Similarly, EPA regulators can adapt to new technological developments, encouraging the use of certain technologies while relaxing standards related to others as new ways of reducing emissions are discovered.

REINS strips EPA of this nimbleness. Under its terms, a new regulation that has an “annual economic impact of $100 million or more,” which is less than 0.0006 percent of the U.S. economy, must be approved by Congress within “70 session days” or it does not go into effect.

Many conservative groups viewed REINS as a high priority during the Obama administration because it would have effectively shut down much of President Obama’s ability to respond to global warming, raise wages, or implement much of the Affordable Care Act, among other things. When Republicans gained control of the House in 2011, regulatory authority delegated by existing statutes became the primary way the Obama administration could continue push major policy changes. Had REINS been law, Republicans would have held a veto over these actions.

For this reason, it is a bit surprising that House Republicans still back this legislation now that a Republican president is about to take office. Trump has promised to rescind many of the Obama administration’s regulatory actions — a promise that will require his administration to promulgate a wave of new regulations if Trump plans to fulfill it. And those new regulations would be subject to REINS if it becomes law. REINS’ 70-session day deadline may make it difficult to keep up with the blizzard of new regulations coming their way, especially if the legislative branch intends to get anything else accomplished.

Nevertheless, in the long-term, REINS is likely to give Republicans a significant advantage — even if it proves an annoyance during the Trump administration. That’s because Democrats must overcome both geographic disadvantages and partisan gerrymandering to win the House, while Republicans can capture a House majority even if they lose the popular vote by a fairly decisive margin. In 2012, for example, Democratic House candidates won nearly 1.4 million more votes than Republicans, yet Republicans captured a solid majority of the House’s seats.

While congressional maps will be redrawn in 2020, in many key states they will be redrawn by state legislatures also elected using gerrymandered maps that give Republicans a significant advantage. Democrats will have a tough time breaking this self-perpetuating cycle of gerrymandering.

As a result, Democratic presidents are far more likely to face a Republican Congress than Republican presidents are likely to have to deal with a Democratic majority. Under REINS, Republican congresses will likely wave through Republican regulatory action, while Democratic regulations will be halted by House Republicans.

http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/41132-house-republicans-will-ring-in-the-new-year-with-a-plan-to-permanently-cripple-government

Officer Involved 2016: Police Officers in the United States Have Killed More Than 1,000 People This Year 
Josh Begley, The Intercept 
Begley writes: "Police officers in the United States have killed more than 1,000 people so far this year. The number is staggering. Who were these people? What were their lives like? How did the future look through their eyes?" 
READ MORE

How Undocumented Texas Immigrants Are Preparing for President Trump 
Annamarya Scaccia, Rolling Stone 
Scaccia writes: "Every weekday at 6 a.m., Virginia Badillo gets up and makes breakfast for her son, David. It's usually a healthy meal - eggs with a side of mixed fruit. David dozes in the bedroom while Badillo cooks, his small frame sprawled across the mattress they share with his father, Francisco Guzman, a landscaper." 
READ MORE

The Shady Reason Baltimore PD Says It Can't Release Records on Aircraft Used to Spy on Protesters 
Kevin Rector, The Baltimore Sun 
Rector writes: "Baltimore officials said they cannot provide the emails of a top police commander who oversaw a controversial aerial surveillance program this year because his email account was not configured properly and the records were not retained as required by state law and city policy." 
READ MORE

Syrian Activists Languish in Government Jails 
Olivia Alabaster, Al Jazeera 
Alabaster writes: "For the crime of providing food to displaced Aleppans, her friends say, activist Zilal Salhani became one among tens of thousands of political prisoners left to an uncertain fate in Syria's jails." 
READ MORE

Fake News Is Old News to Climate Scientists 
Katie Herzog, Grist 
Herzog writes: "Think fake news is a recent plague, borne of the presidential election? It's not." 
READ MORE

---

Contribute to RSN

Become a Fan of RSN on Facebook and Twitter