The depths of Hillary's Photogate ratfuckery are truly unfathomable. |
So what made it so important to her that she felt she needed to change the caption in the University of Chicago archive in order to identify the individual at a sit in that took place over 40 years ago as some long dead acquaintance rather than as Bernie Sanders?
Who then told Sam Frizell, Time magazine's Clinton pool reporter, about this trifling photo flap? What induced Sam Frizell to devote 1000 words to this complete non-story without making any attempt to contact the original photographer? How did Sam Frizell manage to locate three other University of Chicago alumni besides Sally Cook to cast doubt on Sanders' being the person leading the sit in in the photo? Who found these old friends of Rappaport and served them up to Sam Frizell?
What then induced the WaPo's Jonathan Capehart, the live in partner of a richClinton campaign staffer and longtime Clinton employee, to pick up this complete non-story and spin it into a direct attack on Sanders' integrity without making any attempt to contact the original photographer?
Why did corporate cable news then trot out Capehart on several different shows to promulgate this complete non-story?
Altering Jonathan Capehart's own words smearing Sanders to reflect the truth of the situation:
What is at issue is Clinton's ratfuckers' craven use of a photograph to tarnish Sanders' integrity. For a candidate who garnered just 8 percent of New Hampshire Democratic voters who said the most important trait for a candidate was that he or she be “honest,” the least Clinton and her campaign could do is come clean about how they disgustingly used some University of Chicago alumni, a Clinton pool reporter, and the life partner of Clinton campaign staffer to swiftboat a lifelong civil rights activist.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511216872
No comments:
Post a Comment