RSN: Sanders, Clinton Draw Battle Lines on Obama, Foreign Policy in Democratic Debate

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News

---

Frank Rich | Expect the GOP Establishment to Start Looking at the Bright Side of Trump

Frank Rich, New York Magazine
Rich writes: "Donald Trump's win in New Hampshire - and the primary's reshuffling of the party's Establishment candidates - signals what one political reporter has described as 'the growing chasm between the Republican Party's leaders and its voters.' Is it just a matter of time, as some commentators think, until GOP leaders come around?"
READ MORE

Sanders, Clinton Draw Battle Lines on Obama, Foreign Policy in Democratic Debate
Ben Kamisar, The Hill
Kamisar writes: "Bernie Sanders criticized Clinton during the debate for her relationship with President Nixon's secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, mentioning that she has spoken favorably about him as a mentor."
READ MORE

Senator Bernie Sanders and Secretary Hillary Clinton. (photo: Getty)

A relatively muted and wonky Democratic presidential debate on Thursday night dissolved at the end into accusations by Hillary Clinton that Bernie Sanders is abandoning President Obama with his criticism of the party's standard-bearer.

After a decisive loss in the New Hampshire primary this week, Clinton is seeking to right the ship of her campaign in the more diverse states of Nevada and South Carolina, the latter a place where the president is beloved among Democrats.

While most of the PBS debate at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee was somewhat noncontentious, despite the fiery week on the trail, the candidates emerged from their slumber for a heated final 10 minutes.

"Today, Sen. Sanders said that President Obama failed the presidential leadership test, and this is not the first time he has criticized President Obama. In the past, he's called him weak, he's called him a disappointment, he wrote a forward for a book that basically argued voters should have buyer's remorse," Clinton said.

"The kind of criticism that we've heard from Sen. Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama."

The crowd cheered as she praised Obama and landed her blow on Sanders, an Independent senator from Vermont running for the Democratic nomination. But he quickly struck back by calling Clinton's remark a "low blow."

He lauded the president for making "enormous progress" on improving the economy but argued that the president should not be treated as infallible.

"But you know what? Last I heard, we lived in a democratic society. Last I heard, a United States senator had the right to disagree with a president, including a president who's done such an extraordinary job. So I have voiced criticisms. You're right. Maybe you haven't. I have," he said.

He noted that he is friends with the president, who stumped for Sanders as a senator.

"It is really unfair to suggest I've been unsupportive of the president. I have been a strong ally with him on virtually every issue," he said.

"One of us ran against Barack Obama, I was not that candidate."

Clinton, a former secretary of State under Obama, has regularly sought to cast Sanders as not a true member of the Democratic team, most often through repeating his past criticism of the president.

The accusations could hold important sway in 16 days, when the Democratic primary is held in South Carolina. Obama pushed past Clinton there in their 2008 primary race, ultimately beating her by 29 points, in large part due to overwhelming support from black voters.

In recent days, African-American Clinton campaign surrogates have launched repeated attacks questioning Sanders's commitment to civil rights and criminal justice reform.

Sanders faces a major deficit of support among black voters, especially in South Carolina, and has put forth significant efforts over the past weeks looking to close that gap.

While the beginning portion of the debate centered on race relations and criminal justice, the two candidates mostly sung in tune, each specifically noting their agreement with one another.

When asked if race relations would be better under a Sanders administration than "they have been," Sanders said "absolutely," pivoting back to a fundamentally economic argument as the reason for improvement.

"Absolutely, because what we will do is instead of give tax breaks to millionaires, we will create millions of jobs for low-income kids so they are not hanging out on street corners, make sure those kids stay in school and are able to get a college education," he said.

"When you give low income kids, African-American, white, Latino kids the opportunities to get their lives together, they are not going to end up in jail, they are going to end up in the productive economy, which is where we want them."

One of the more heated moments from the earlier portion of the debate came on campaign finance, building off a question about whether a candidate who takes donations from Wall Street can make unbiased decisions about the financial industry. Clinton also used that moment to display her ties to Obama, noting that his former super-PAC now supports her.

"[Obama] was the recipient of the largest number of Wall Street donations of anyone running on the Democratic side ever. When it mattered, he stood up and took on Wall Street. He pushed through and he passed the Dodd-Frank regulation, the toughest regulations since the 1930s," she said.

"So let's not in any way imply here that either President Obama or myself would in any way not take on any vested interest, whether it's Wall Street or drug companies, insurance companies or, frankly, the gun lobby.”

Sanders pushed back by framing Clinton as naive for thinking that industries are donating without ulterior motives.

"Let's not insult the intelligence of the American people. People aren’t dumb," he said. "Why in God’s name does Wall Street make huge campaign contributions? I guess for the fun of it. They just want to throw money around."

He also sought to push Clinton harder on foreign policy, an accepted weakness of his. In an orchestrated moment, he criticized Clinton for her relationship with President Nixon's secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, mentioning that she has spoken favorably about him as a mentor.

"Henry Kissinger was one of the most destructive secretaries of State in the modern history of this country. I am proud to say that Henry Kissinger is not my friend. I will not take advice from Henry Kissinger," he said, arguing that Kissinger's foreign policy surrounding the Vietnam War led to the rise of extremism in Vietnam and Cambodia.

Clinton responded by noting that “journalists have asked who you do listen to on foreign policy, and you have yet to answer that.”

Sanders jumped in with a barb: "It ain’t Henry Kissinger."

But when Sanders pivoted back to his well-worn argument that his vote against the Iraq War, which Clinton supported, shows he has the foreign policy judgment needed to serve as commander in chief, Clinton parried by arguing that a vote in 2002 is not "a plan to defeat ISIS in 2016."

"When people go to vote in primaries or caucuses, they are voting not only for the president, they are voting for the commander in chief. And it is important that people really look hard at what the threats and dangers we face are and who is prepared to deal for dealing with them," she said.

"As we all remember, Sen. Obama, when he ran against me, was against the War in Iraq. And yet when he won, he turned to me, trusting my judgment, my experience to become secretary of State.

The Democratic candidates met Thursday night, nine days before the party's next nominating contest,Nevada's caucuses. Limited polling in the state from before January showed a significant lead for Clinton, but her team has been careful to downplay expectations despite her strong support among Hispanics and African-Americans, groups that made up 30 percent of the caucus electorate in 2008.

http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/35150-sanders-clinton-draw-battle-lines-on-obama-foreign-policy-in-democratic-debate

Congressional Black Caucus's PAC Endorses Hillary Without Consulting Black Caucus Members
Ben Kamisar, The Hill
Kamisar writes: "The endorsement came from its board without consultation from CBC membership."
READ MORE

The Terrorism Blacklist Is Secretly Wielding Power Over the Lives of Millions of Americans
Namir Shabibi and Ben Bryant, VICE
Excerpt: "An American Muslim civil rights leader praised by George W. Bush, an economist honored by the British Queen, and a prominent anti-extremism campaigner have all been secretly given a 'terrorism' designation on a confidential database that banks use as a reference tool for blacklisting customers. The highly influential World-Check database has also listed major charities, activists, and mainstream religious institutions under its category of 'terrorism.'"
READ MORE

NYPD Officer Found Guilty in 2014 Shooting of Unarmed Black Man
Thomas Tracy, Christina Carrega-Woodby, John Marzulli, Denis Slattery and Stephen Rex Brown, New York Daily News
Excerpt: "The rookie NYPD cop who gunned down innocent and unarmed Akai Gurley in a Brooklyn housing project was convicted Thursday of manslaughter."
READ MORE

US, Russia and Other Powers Agree on 'Cessation of Hostilities' in Syria
Karen DeYoung, The Washington Post
DeYoung writes: "The United States, Russia and other powers agreed to a 'cessation of hostilities' in Syria's civil war, to take place within the next week, and immediate humanitarian access to besieged areas, Secretary of State John F. Kerry announced here early Friday."
READ MORE

Over 50 Percent of the World Breathes in Toxic Air
Kevin Mathews, Care2
Mathews writes: "Everyone needs clean air to survive, yet somehow it is not an internationally recognized human right. That probably has something to do with the fact that over half of the world's population live in areas where they breathe in toxic air. Altogether, that means there are more than 3.5 billion people inhaling dangerous air into their lungs on a daily basis."
READ MORE

A child wears a mask due to poor air quality in China. (photo: Shutterstock)

veryone needs clean air to survive, yet somehow it is not an internationally recognized human right. That probably has something to do with the fact that over half of the world’s population live in areas where they breathe in toxic air. Altogether, that means there are more than 3.5 billion people inhaling dangerous air into their lungs on a daily basis.

A lot of present day discussions about pollution focus on the long-term consequences that are in store thanks to climate change. While those discussions are certainly important, the truth is that we don’t need to make predictions about future environmental catastrophe to see the harms of pollution – those harms are already here.

The Environmental Protection Index (EPI) track changes – both improvements and regressions – on a number of important environmental issues. Air that is unsafe to breathe is one area where researchers see conditions getting alarmingly worse.

Air should be life giving, but for half the world, that’s no longer the case. Currently, health officials attribute about 5.5 million deaths around the world to unclean air each year. Given that over 50 million people die in a given year, toxic air deaths account for roughly 10 percent of all deaths.

In better news, the EPI is simultaneously reporting a major decrease in consumption of polluted water. In 2000, about 1 billion people drank unsafe water, a figure that has essentially been cut in half in the past fifteen years. Access to clean water is expanding because poorer nations are industrializing and technologies are improving.

Alas, it’s hard to argue that this industrialization is a net positive for the environment. While providing clean water to hundreds of millions of people who lacked it previously is an unquestionable benefit, industrialization is also a huge reason for the rise in air pollution.

Accordingly, it’s heavily populated countries like China and India that are rapidly expanding their number of factories and businesses that are most threatened by air pollution. For example, in India and Nepal, this gross air is almost inescapable: 75 percent of the overall population in this region is regularly exposed to deadly smog.

“With the very survival of the planet at stake, we hope leaders will be inspired to act – especially in urban areas where an increasing majority of the world’s population lives,” said Kim Samuel, one of the lead researchers on the EPI report.

The health of the economy is important – but it shouldn’t come at the cost of the health of humanity. Exposing half the world to unsafe air sounds like nothing short of a catastrophe, yet it’s a choice global leaders are implicitly making by agreeing to only insignificant changes in environmental policy.

http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/35145-over-50-percent-of-the-world-breathes-in-toxic-air