RSN: We Filed Suit to Prevent Mass Confusion at the California Primary

Reader Supported News | 22 May 16

---

Can Anyone Help With a Donation, Please

We are way behind where we should be at this point in the month. Really because only a precious few of you are donating. The rest are not but can.

Now would be a great time.

Marc Ash 
Curator, Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!

---

If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts
CA 95611

---

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News

---

FOCUS: Bill Simpich | We Filed Suit to Prevent Mass Confusion at the California Primary

Bill Simpich, Reader Supported News
Simpich writes: "When you see this level of nonsense, you have to do something. I threw up my hands and did something that I could do. I got together with my friends. We filed a voting rights suit in federal court today on behalf of our left-leaning voting rights group for Bernie, the right-leaning American Independence Party of California, an Independent voter for Bernie, and a Democratic voter for Bernie."
READ MORE

f you are an Independent voter in California, voting is very confusing.

Consider this. Most Californians vote by mail. There’s the rub.

Elections Code 3006 makes it mandatory for any government form that is an application to vote by mail to explain that Independent voters have the right to request a Democratic, American Independent or Libertarian presidential primary ballot – a “crossover ballot.” Sounds good.

But ... not all of these applications provide this mandatory notice. Not even here in the supposedly enlightened Bay Area. Look at all these counties that got it wrong.

You can see we’re not talking about just one or two – such as the websites for the Department of Elections of the City and County of San Francisco and the Registrar of Voters for Alameda County, which are the focus of the suit. We’re talking more like ten or twenty counties.

You also see the voter instructions for Los Angeles County saying things like voter registration closes on April 18 – when the deadline is actually May 23!

Here’s another problem: It’s mandatory for these applications to let Independents know that they have the “legal right” to personally deliver their applications to vote by mail back to their county of board of elections by May 31. This notice often isn’t given either.

Why not? The elections people may not want muddy boots on their nice carpets. Or they may simply want fewer Independents to vote. After all, once people have traipsed downtown to pick up their ballot, and see voting machines sitting there unused, they’ll probably just wind up voting right there!

Many of the Independents (also known as “no party preference,” or NPP) don’t know they can ask for a Democratic ballot and vote for Bernie (or Hillary, for that matter).

It’s so confusing that I changed to Democrat for this election so I’d be sure I could vote for Bernie.

When you see this level of nonsense, you have to do something. I threw up my hands and did something that I could do. I got together with my friends. We filed a voting rights suit in federal court todayon behalf of our left-leaning voting rights group for Bernie, the right-leaning American Independence Party of California, an Independent voter for Bernie, and a Democratic voter for Bernie.

Our Democratic voter plaintiff would like to have the option to be an Independent and vote for Bernie, but she doesn’t want to take the chance given this situation. Some Independents are so nervous that (like me) they are re-registering as Democrats before the Monday registration deadline!

One article about this case, “Clinton’s California Dreaming of Election Stealing,” is not the message I want to send, but it typifies an understandable reaction to a situation that results in serious disenfranchisement. The two major parties toy with the Independent voters of this country. They run the boards of elections and they make up the rules as they please as they go along. The result is that every county is a fiefdom, run by each county election official in a different way. This does not inspire confidence in the integrity of the vote.

I’m not suggesting that crossover voting is the cure to the nation’s ills. Our problems are a lot deeper than that. I understand why many parties ban crossover voting – Rush Limbaugh used to delight in egging on his dittohead fan base to “knock off” the strongest liberal opponents in the opposition primaries.

Why do the Democrats allow crossovers? The Democratic Party apparently believes its own rhetoric and wants to attract Independents back to their party, given that the Republicans can no longer overtly sabotage their primary. Given that the Independents are not being treated with respect, this strategy is not going to work. Reasonable people throughout the political spectrum can agree that it’s wrong to tamper with the right to vote in any way, shape or form.

We list many remedies in the lawsuit – from asking the counties to correct these errors over major media, to pushing back the registration deadlines, to simply making sure the polls don’t run out of crossover ballots. There is an even better remedy. It just requires some thought and some social action.

The quick fix that everybody can do is vote now, either by mail or in person. Don’t wait and find out about problems on the last day. We have early voting in California – not publicized by the major media.

The polling booths in the basement of San Francisco City Hall are empty and silent. They will be jammed, however, on Election Day. Independents can step up and ask for a crossover ballot – but only if they know to ask. The poll workers are trained not to tell them of the option!

Disenfranchisement is a terrible thing. It’s been going on in the South forever. We’re finally getting a look at it in places like Brooklyn, where 126,000 were purged from the rolls shortly before the New York primary. A 14% drop of Democrats in five months? Right before the primary?

Brooklyn is where Bernie grew up. Independents couldn’t vote in the New York primary, but they couldn’t exactly take the vote away from Democrats ... unless they were purged from the rolls.

Purges of adversarial voters are not just done by Karl Rove. They are done by forces of political power, exercised by people who make up the rules and then enforce the rules they made up. If the elections officials aren’t vigilant or allow ambiguous language to creep in or worse, thousands of votes are affected.

Some of this conduct is incompetent. Some of it is criminal. All of it has to stop.

---

Bill Simpich is a civil rights attorney who knows that it doesn't have to be like this, but it will continue unless people speak out against these grand juries. My next article will discuss how a new Supreme Court case means that anti-war activists can be subpoenaed by grand juries for nonviolent action - after all, it might free up someone's resources to take violent action.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

 http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/37010-focus-we-filed-suit-to-prevent-mass-confusion-at-the-california-primary