Instead of addressing my car's BRAKE FAILURE, they denied it, insisted that 'electronic brakes feel different,' insisted there was "NO COMPUTER ERROR MESSAGE," refusing to provide the printout to me.
Do you suppose Route 44 Toyota is as nervous as I was when my car glided through a STOP SIGN because it had NO BRAKES?
This is the same Dilly, Dally Dan who treatened a SLAPP suit when I wrote that Route 44 Toyota illegally requested my credit reports, as well as that of a disinterested 3rd Party.
I would like to
think it goes without saying, but am compelled to say it anyways, this
inspection is being conducted at facilities provided by Route 44 Toyota as a
courtesy to NHTSA and the parties. As you know, this vehicle belongs to your
client, not Route 44 Toyota. This is not an opportunity to interact with other
customers of the dealership or interfere with their day to day operations…nor
does it need to be. That would include your client covering her car upon
arrival with large disparaging signs about the defendants in this matter. That
would be particularly inappropriate given that my client’s participation in
making facilities available is, again, as a courtesy. We intend to make you and
your client’s time at the dealership for this inspection as pleasant and civil
as possible. I am hoping for the same in return.
Thanks,
Daniel J. Vieira
***NOTE: You are free to settle this matter! How can I drive a car with NO BRAKES?
No comments:
Post a Comment