Search This Blog

Translate

Blog Archive

Middleboro Review 2

NEW CONTENT MOVED TO MIDDLEBORO REVIEW 2

Toyota

Since the Dilly, Dally, Delay & Stall Law Firms are adding their billable hours, the Toyota U.S.A. and Route 44 Toyota posts have been separated here:

Route 44 Toyota Sold Me A Lemon



Showing posts with label Christian nation?: hungry Americans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christian nation?: hungry Americans. Show all posts

Monday, November 11, 2019

A new Trump administration rule will deprive nearly 1 million school kids of automatic free lunches, official figures say




Image may contain: text


JUST ANOTHER THIRD WORLD COUNTRY THANKS TO tRUMP AND HIS WEALTHY MISCREANTS! 


About this website
BUSINESSINSIDER.COM
The Trump administration is seeking to tighten eligibility for the food stamps program, and new figures show the impact on school kids.



  • According to Department of Agriculture figures released Tuesday, 982,000 children will no longer automatically qualify for a free school lunch under planned changes to the food stamps program. 
  • Around 55% of those children will now have to pay. The remaining 45% remain eligible for free lunches, but will have to pass extra bureaucracy to access what was once automatic.
  • The Trump administration claims its changes close loopholes that allows children free lunches even if their parents are not really in poverty.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.
A new Trump administration rule will deprive nearly one million children of automatically qualifying for a free school lunch, according to US Department of Agriculture (USDA) figures. 
Under proposed changes to the  Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) — the official name for food stamps — nearly 1 million children will no longer automatically be certified to receive free meals, according to an analysis released by the department late Tuesday. 
The administration is aiming to close what it claims are loopholes in the food stamps program that allows children to receive school meals even if their parents earn enough to place them above the official poverty level.
The threshold for being considered in poverty is an income of $25,000 for a family of four. The USDA said that some families have been claiming food stamps despite earning up to $50,000.
Officials also want to introduce an additional rule that even families with an income at the poverty threshold can only receive food stamps if they demonstrate they have less than $2,250 in assets. 
The analysis says that enforcing new, tighter rules would mean that 982,000 children would no longer be automatically eligible for free school meals.
Of these, 45% would be eligible for free school meals if their parents or guardians went through an application process. 
The remaining 55% would have to pay for school meals, according to the figures. 
Lisa Davis of the advocacy group No Kid Hungry told The New York Times that the application process could itself be a barrier for some children to receive the lunches. 
States, she told the publication, have relied on automatic eligibility because "they know too many eligible children fall through the cracks when parents have to fill out and submit a paper application."
"Parents may not understand it. The paperwork may not make it home or it may not make it back to school. Vulnerable families can fall through the cracks," Davis said. "There is no guarantee that they will end up re-enrolled."
The USDA told the Associated Press that the rule change would make application criteria more consistent, and that the consultation period on the impact of the change would remain open for another two weeks. 

Wednesday, December 7, 2016

This & that.... FAKE NEWS FROM TRUMP'S MOUTH?





Occupy Democrats

This really puts things in perspective...



FAKE NEWS FROM TRUMP'S MOUTH?

Or do we call it LIES?

The Thin Skinned Bully LIES so much he can't discern FACTS!

You voted for a LIAR?


 The Hill shared a link.

Trump wrote that the deal was for "more than $4 billion" and called 
for the order…

HILL.CM/A0LV7GM

Monday, December 5, 2016

This & that....Texas GOP Kills Medicaid for Disabled Kids




 CAFE's photo.
CAFE
Just so we're clear, this is roughly a thousand times worse than any email.



Occupy Democrats
LOL.
Image by Occupy Democrats, LIKE our page for more!




 link.
Michigan did not catch a single welfare recipient using illegal drugs 
during a one-year pilot program.

DETROITNEWS.COM|BY JONATHAN OOSTING


Michigan did not catch a single welfare recipient using illegal drugs during a one-year insulting Republican pilot program designed to screen and test suspected substance abusers, provide them with treatment or kick them off government cash assistance if they refused.

Meme GOP
The Rude Pundit

 AlterNet's photo.

AlterNet
Amen.


Kennedy Family Writes Anti-Trump Op-Ed In Washington Post That EVERYONE Should Read

If there is one family in America that is qualified to speak on the issue of hatred and violence, it is the Kennedys. John F. Kennedy was shot and killed in 1963 followed by Robert F. Kennedy in 1968.

The remaining Kennedy members were so disturbed by Donald Trump that they wrote the following op-ed for The Washington Post.
Written by William Kennedy Smith and Jean Kennedy Smith
On April 4, 1968, the day the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was shot and killed, Robert Kennedy was campaigning for the presidency in Indianapolis. Bobby conveyed the news of King’s death to a shattered, mostly black audience. He took pains to remind those whose first instinct may have been toward violence that President John F. Kennedy had also been shot and killed. Bobby went on, “What we need in the United States is not division; what we need in the United States is not hatred; what we need in the United States is not violence and lawlessness, but is love, and wisdom, and compassion toward one another, and a feeling of justice toward those who still suffer within our country, whether they be white or whether they be black
That speech has crystallized into the single most enduring portrait of Bobby’s candidacy. Because it was extemporaneous, it conveyed directly, and with raw emotion, his own vulnerability, his aspirations for his country, and a deep compassion for the suffering of others. Bobby concluded his remarks that night by urging those listening to return home and say a prayer for our country and for our people. Those words mattered. While there were riots in cities across the nation that night, Indianapolis did not burn.
Today, almost 50 years later, words still matter. They shape who we are as a people and who we wish to be as a nation. In the white-hot cauldron of a presidential campaign, it is still the words delivered extemporaneously, off the cuff, in the raw pressure of the moment that matter most. They say most directly what is in a candidate’s heart. So it was with a real sense of sadness and revulsion that we listened to Donald Trump, the Republican nominee for president, as he referred to the options available to “Second Amendment people,” a remark widely, and we believe correctly, interpreted as a thinly veiled reference or “joke” about the possibility of political assassination.
Political violence is a terrible inherent risk to any free society. Dictators and strongmen like Vladimir Putin have an answer. They are surrounded and shielded by force at all times. They do not brook dissent. In democracies, we expect our leaders to be accessible and, by and large, they want to be. Inevitably, that makes them vulnerable and the loss of a leader at a crucial time impacts family, country, and even the world, for generations. Anyone who loves politics, the open competition of ideas and public participation in a free society, knows that political violence is the greatest of all civic sins. It is not to be encouraged. It is not funny. It is not a joke.
By now, we have heard enough dark and offensive rhetoric from Trump to know that it reflects something fundamentally troubled, and troubling, about his candidacy. Trump’s remarks frequently, if not inevitably, spark outrage, which is followed by a clarification that, in lieu of an apology, seeks to attribute the dark undertones of his words to the listener’s twisted psyche. This fools no one. Whether you like what he is saying or, like a growing segment of the electorate, you reject it, it is easy to grasp Trump’s meaning from his words. But what to make of a candidate who directly appeals to violence, smears his opponents and publicly bullies a Gold Star family, a decorated prisoner of war, and a reporter with a disability, among others? To borrow the words of Army Counsel Joseph Welch, directed at another dangerous demagogue: “Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?”
The truth remains that words do matter, especially when it comes to presidential candidates. On that basis alone, Donald Trump is not qualified to be president of the United States.



 link.
Welcome to your new nightmare

EATER.COM|BY WHITNEY FILLOON

 
The funding cuts will take place 10 days before Christmas.

IFYOUONLYNEWS.COM|BY JAMESON PARKER