Search This Blog

Translate

Blog Archive

Middleboro Review 2

NEW CONTENT MOVED TO MIDDLEBORO REVIEW 2

Toyota

Since the Dilly, Dally, Delay & Stall Law Firms are adding their billable hours, the Toyota U.S.A. and Route 44 Toyota posts have been separated here:

Route 44 Toyota Sold Me A Lemon



Showing posts with label GOP deregulatory frenzy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GOP deregulatory frenzy. Show all posts

Sunday, February 19, 2017

Sweden releases photo of Terrorist Suspect!




Photo of Sweden Terrorist Suspect released.....
Janis Ian
From Neil Macdougall on Twitter, BREAKING NEWS. Swedish police have
released picture of the man sought in the Swedish terror attack Trump referred to.#lastnightinsweden #swedenincident #TrumpRally #presidentinyhands

my big brother's no psychiatrist, but he knows sick when he sees it!
President Donald Trump is anot what I understand and define to be 
“sane”: accepting that certain manifestations of reality are irrefutable.
DENVERPOST.COM



Is Donald Trump sane? The evidence suggests he’s not


PUBLISHED: 

Three weeks into the new presidential administration, many of us are overwhelmed by the constant barrage of bizarre and, frankly, incomprehensible “scandals” and controversies that have emanated from the White House.
I am not talking about the ban on visitors from seven Islamic countries, the building of a wall between the U.S. and Mexico, or the appointment of executive branch agency heads who are devoted to abolishing them.
No, I am talking about the far more troubling string of statements issued by the president of the United States, whether in the form of middle-of-the-night tweets or in televised interviews and other public settings, in which easily proven facts are simply misrepresented or contradicted by absolute and unambiguous untruths, a.k.a. “lies”:  that there were 1.3 million people on the National Mall for the inauguration, that it was the most widely viewed inauguration in U.S. history, and that 3 million illegal immigrants unlawfully cast their vote on Nov. 8, apparently all of them voting for Hillary Clinton, that busloads of Massachusetts residents rolled into New Hampshire to cast illegal votes, or that the American crime rate is the highest it’s been in 45 years.
This is not funny stuff.  It is deadly serious.  What these statements, and others like them (both during the campaign and since Jan. 20) demonstrate is that the president of the United States is not sane.  Read that again, slowly: The president of the United States is not sane.
Now, this may strike many of you as an outlandish, partisan attack on a man with whose policies or positions I disagree.  It’s not.  I disagree with the policies and positions of Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan, Mike Pence and many other prominent conservative Republicans.  But I would not assert that any one of those men — nor George W. Bush, Stephen Bannon or Karl Rove — is not sane.  They all are completely sane — they accept that certain facts are facts, and that merely because you want something to be true does not make it so.
So, how do I reach my conclusion that the president of the United States is not sane?   I have no psychological training or expertise of any kind.  I am applying my own lay understanding of what it means to be sane.
I’m not saying Trump is “incapable of forming an opinion distinguishing right from wrong.”  He’s not insane. But he’s also not what I understand and define to be “sane”:  accepting that certain manifestations of reality are irrefutable (e.g., that the sun rises in the morning and sets at night; that gravity causes object to fall to Earth, not rise into space; that 5 is larger than 3, etc.).  Someone who does not actually accept such basic, fundamental and irrefutable facts, is, in my estimation, not sane.
Of course, when Donald Trump asserts, as fact, certain matters that are irrefutably incorrect, it is possible that he does so as a calculated and knowing untruth — for whatever political or other purpose such lies are promulgated. That’s not uncommon among politicians, at all levels of government.  But I honestly believe that is not what is happening.  I maintain that Trump is not lying, because he does not know or even believe the things he says are untrue.  No, he truly believes they are true.  And that — the actual, subjective disconnect from reality — is what I define as not sane.
Once again, this is not a laughing matter.  It is not satire.  It is not political criticism or commentary.  It is deadly serious stuff:  The president of the United States is not sane.
I am far from alone in questioning the president’s emotional stability.
In a letter to the editor of The New York Times published recently, Dr. Lance Dodes, a retired assistant clinical professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, and Dr. Joseph Schachter, a former chairman of the Committee on Research Proposals, International Psychoanalytic Association, stated explicitly that the president is suffering from “grave emotional instability.”  An additional 33 mental health professionals co-signed the letter.
Sen. Al Franken said on CNN recently that Republican colleagues of his in the Senate have confidentially stated that they “question the President’s mental health.”
I don’t know what we, the American people, are to do about this, but the first step to solving a problem is to acknowledge its existence and to fully understand its nature.
So what, exactly, are we talking about here?  Again, I have no training in psychology, so I must rely on reputable sources such as Drs. Dodes and Schachter to support my thesis.  Unfortunately, many psychiatrists feel constrained, by “the Goldwater rule,” from offering opinions concerning the possible mental conditions of public figures.  Some professionals, who are not subject to that rule, have opined that Trump suffers from a particular psychological condition, known as “narcissistic personality disorder.”
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), which is published by the American Psychiatric Association, is frequently used by professionals to diagnose mental conditions.
DSM-5 criteria for narcissistic personality disorder include these features:
  • Having an exaggerated sense of self-importance
  • Expecting to be recognized as superior even without achievements that warrant it
  • Exaggerating your achievements and talents
  • Being preoccupied with fantasies about success, power, brilliance, beauty or the perfect mate
  • Believing that you are superior and can only be understood by or associate with equally special people
  • Requiring constant admiration
  • Having a sense of entitlement
  • Expecting special favors and unquestioning compliance with your expectations
  • Taking advantage of others to get what you want
  • Having an inability or unwillingness to recognize the needs and feelings of others
  • Being envious of others and believing others envy you
  • Behaving in an arrogant or haughty manner
And here is how the Mayo Clinic’s website describes the condition (see if it strikes you as accurately describing Trump’s behavior):
“If you have narcissistic personality disorder, you may come across as conceited, boastful or pretentious. You often monopolize conversations. You may belittle or look down on people you perceive as inferior. You may feel a sense of entitlement — and when you don’t receive special treatment, you may become impatient or angry. You may insist on having “the best” of everything —  for instance, the best car, athletic club or medical care.
“At the same time, you have trouble handling anything that may be perceived as criticism. You may have secret feelings of insecurity, shame, vulnerability and humiliation. To feel better, you may react with rage or contempt and try to belittle the other person to make yourself appear superior. Or you may feel depressed and moody because you fall short of perfection.”
I am aware that certain critics claimed that President Barack Obama was a textbook example of narcissistic personality disorder.  And scholars at the Pew Research Center even ranked each of the presidents concerning their level of narcissism.  So, assigning serious and debilitating psychological conditions to presidents is nothing new.
However, as far as I am aware, no prior person who occupied our nation’s highest office has ever consistently and repeatedly made statements that are so unmistakably counterfactual, and, when challenged to authenticate or substantiate such statements, simply abided by his prior assertion without producing any “proof.”
I may be wrong, and I am certainly open to arguments refuting my thesis. But if I am correct, then it is vital that we, collectively, begin discussing, seriously and thoughtfully, where we go from here.
Dan Recht is a criminal defense and constitutional law attorney. He is a former chair of the ACLU of Colorado and former president of the Colorado Criminal Defense Bar.



: (
Trumpers: You bought the lies Big Polluters told you about de-regulation?
Goodbye Gulf fishing industry

Environmentalists are warning the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) that its draft plan to continue allowing oil and gas
companies to dump unlimited…
ALTERNATIVEMEDIASYNDICATE.COM







Saturday, January 30, 2016

RSN: Erin Brockovich to Stephen Colbert: 'Flint, Michigan Is the Tip of the Iceberg'




Erin Brockovich explains the Flint water crisis to Stephen Colbert. (photo: The Late Show With Stephen Colbert)
Erin Brockovich explains the Flint water crisis to Stephen Colbert. (photo: The Late Show 
With Stephen Colbert)



Erin Brockovich to Stephen Colbert: 'Flint, Michigan Is the Tip of the Iceberg'

By Cole Mellino, EcoWatch
30 January 16

nvironmental activist Erin Brockovich appeared on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert to talk about the Flint water crisis. Brockovich said members of the Flint community reached out to her a year ago because they were concerned about how their water looked, tasted and smelled. She sent a team of experts to Flint to investigate and even drafted a protocol for how the city should deal with the problem.
She explained to the audience what went wrong in Flint and what the city needs to do to provide residents with potable water. Colbert then asked Brockovich if Flint was the tip of the “leadberg.” Are there other communities facing similar problems?, he asked.
Brockovich answered with a resounding yes. “I can tell you that Flint, Michigan is the tip of the iceberg,” she said. “I can tell you for certain that this is a national crisis that we are not getting ready to face. The crisis is already here. Even since Flint has hit the national stage, we’ve found out that Sebring, Ohio has the same problem … The same thing is happening in Louisiana, and we’re just now hearing rumors—I haven’t verified it before I came out—we’re having the same situation in Wisconsin.”
Watch the interview with Brockovich here:





http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/34895-erin-brockovich-to-stephen-colbert-flint-michigan-is-the-tip-of-the-iceberg


Wednesday, April 22, 2015

RSN: Pipelines Leak and the People Who Own Them Lie






It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


YOU MAY WANT TO HAVE A LOOK AT THE FUNDRAISING PROGRESS BAR: That’s accurate. We are way short of our budget for April. Yes we gained a little traction earlier in the week, but we are nowhere near completion. There are limitations in terms of what we can do. / Marc Ash, Founder Reader Supported News





A massive fire roars following a natural gas pipeline rupture that killed eight people and injured more than 60 on Sept. 9, 2010, in San Bruno, California. (photo: AP)
A massive fire roars following a natural gas pipeline rupture that killed eight people and injured more than 60 on Sept. 9, 2010, in San Bruno, California. (photo: AP)

Pipelines Leak and the People Who Own Them Lie

By Charles Pierce, Esquire
22 April 15

iger Beat On The Potomac almost gets it right today in its longform analysis of the dangers of the country's energy pipelines, and, specifically, of how the Pipeline And Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, which is supposed to be the federal regulatory body governing the nation's pipeline, has been rendered toothless by the usual suspects -- except, alas, the usual suspects go unnamed. It doesn't make me want to guzzle the Chateau Petrus, but it's worth a nice cold Leinie's lager in a frosted schooner.
"There is nowhere today the sense that the Office of Pipeline Safety is in charge," Jim Hall said then, "or that its regulations, its inspections, its assets, its staffing and its spirit are adequate to the task." Bellingham was supposed to change that. But more than 15 years later, Hall says he sees little evidence of meaningful improvements. "Unfortunately," he told POLITICO, "I think I would give the same speech today."
There are some genuinely terrifying statistics about how old some of these pipelines are, and the piece is admirably replete with horror stories about what happens when pipelines leak and when they explode, or both, some of which got by me completely because, often, they take place in out of the way places. You know, the kind of places where Real Americans live, according to many of the politicians who patronize them every couple of years and then arrange the economy so that their backyards turn to glop and their pastures detonate.
The ruptured pipe leaked more than 840,000 gallons of oil sands crude into a creek that fed the Kalamazoo River, ultimately spreading for 35 miles. The operator, Canadian oil giant Enbridge, misread alarms in its control room and twice tried to pump more fuel through the broken line. Seventeen hours passed before oil was shut off for good. At the time, it was the largest onshore oil spill in U.S. history. But Marshall got scant attention in 2010 as the public and policymakers focused on the Gulf of Mexico. The Zinn family saw the Michigan disaster up close. The family's land was a few hundred feet from the nearly 7-foot gash in Enbridge's pipeline. Four decades earlier, the family's patriarch, Frank Zinn, had fought in vain to stop the 30-inch-diameter pipe from being laid across his property. He had been assured that a major spill was unlikely.
The companies lie. Pipelines leak. Pipelines explode. People die. The companies lie again.
It does seem from the story that PHMSA is fairly hopeless at this point, but good luck getting the monkeyhouse to pass any legislation to deal with the fact that huge swaths of the country are basically land mines at this point. In fact, there are a couple of macro questions that the TBOTP does not confront in a major way, and they are vividly illustrated in this account of the disastrous 2013 rupture that deluged Mayflower, Arkansas with 200,000 gallons of heavy crude.
The Little Rock suburb's congressman at the time was Tim Griffin, a staunch Republican and former Karl Rove aide who is skeptical of federal regulations and strongly in favor of pipelines. But after the Pegasus pipe burst, forcing the evacuation of 21 homes, Griffin challenged PHMSA's secrecy in a way that few others have. When ExxonMobil, the owner of the 65-year-old pipeline, refused to release the full engineering analysis conducted after the leak, PHMSA deferred to the oil company's decision. So Griffin obtained a copy of the massive report and posted it on his congressional website. Weeks later, he released three more reports on the failed pipeline's condition that ExxonMobil and PHMSA had tried to keep under wraps. "They politely requested that I not" share the data, Griffin recalled in an interview. "And I did."
Griffin, now serving as Arkansas's Lieutenant Governor, is a true believer. In fact, he was one of the U.S. Attorneys that got jammed into office when Karl Rove was ratfking the Department of Justice during the last administration. As a member of Congress, he was very much the typical conservative on the subject of environmental laws, and federal regulations in general. What he did in this case was very much the right thing but, just for the hell of it, let's check his most recent campaign and see how deeply the lessons of Mayflower took.
The EPA's proposed expansion of the 'waters of the United States' would subject Arkansans, especially farmers and ranchers, to costly and overly burdensome federal regulations, harm our agriculture industry that is vital to our state's economy and replace state and locally based conservation efforts with a top-down, one-size-fits-all approach. Our vote today stops this massive government overreach in its tracks and requires federal agencies to consult with states and local governments when proposing these regulatory measures on local waters."
I think the definition of "costly and overly burdensome federal regulations" in our present context is directly proportional to how greasy a lack of effective federal regulations made your constituents. And does Tim Griffin love him some death funnel? You bet he does.
Congressman Griffin is sponsoring the bill to force the Obama Administration to approve the XL Pipeline without the environmental review now required by law. What's odd is that Griffin represents Arkansas, a state with no stake in the Pipeline. [Editor's note: There IS the tube plant in Little Rock, but its work on that project is complete except for shipment.]But the Kochs have a stake in Griffin. In his maiden run for Congress, Griffin was elected with an eye-popping $167,000 donation from the Kochs. For $167,000, any congressman will wash your car — with their tongue. For the Kochs, $167K is peanuts. Their political action operation, Americans for Prosperity, built a quarter billion dollar fund this past year, a sum never seen even in the US politics cash swamp.
And there are both unanswered questions, dancing in a graceful gavotte to keep the piece from a real conclusion. TBOTP's piece has a serious "both sides do it" element running through it. It engages one critic from each party -- Fred Upton is the Republican and Peter DeFazio is the Democrat -- and it is tough on the current administration for neglecting the PHMSA. (There hasn't even been a permanent director since October. Stop me if you've heard that one before.) But the fact remains that there is not a single Republican presidential candidate who says anything about federal regulations except what a job-killer they are. There is not a single Republican politician who has stood up in any substantial way against the deregulatory frenzy that has overtaken the party over the past 35 years, and against the government-is-the-problem philosophy from which it emerged when Saint Ronnie began the process of rolling back the stone from the tomb of the Mellons and the Carnegies. Support for the Keystone XL death funnel is as rigid a litmus test within the party as anything is.
 
In 2013, the folks at InsideClimate won a Pulitzer for their investigation of the Enbridge spill that TBOTP mentions. And one of the things they discovered was that the approach of the two parties on the issue of regulating pipelines tracked perfectly with what you might have expected.
President Barack Obama's 2013 budget would increase funding for the agency. Republican Rep. Paul Ryan's budget does not specify how much PHMSA should receive, but it recommended slashing funding for the Department of Transportation, which encompasses PHMSA.
The Democratic party has been feckless and timid on this subject. The Republicans, on the other hand, especially now that the Supreme Court has legitimized influence peddling on a grand scale, have been little more than vandals. That makes a difference, or ought to, anyway.