Search This Blog

Translate

Blog Archive

Middleboro Review 2

NEW CONTENT MOVED TO MIDDLEBORO REVIEW 2

Toyota

Since the Dilly, Dally, Delay & Stall Law Firms are adding their billable hours, the Toyota U.S.A. and Route 44 Toyota posts have been separated here:

Route 44 Toyota Sold Me A Lemon



Showing posts with label Stolen Valor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stolen Valor. Show all posts

Saturday, October 24, 2015

VoteVets.org: Pastor George Hunley of Louisa, Virginia, caught lying about ‘black robber’ busted again for pretending to be a Navy SEAL



Pastor caught lying about ‘black robber’ busted again for pretending to be a Navy SEAL


A U.S. Army veteran noticed a curious thing at a recent convocation event at Jerry Falwell’s Liberty University. A graying man was wearing military dress uniform and badges that indicate what seemed like an impossible accumulation of achievements and commendations.
The man identified himself as Mark Joston, the Friendly Atheist reports. Joston had insignia on his uniform identifying him as a Navy SEAL with four purple hearts, an Afghanistan and Iraq veteran, and rear admiral for the CIA’s special ops.

Turns out, those unbelievable achievements were just that — unbelievable.
The man was none of those things, nor was his name Mark Joston. He was Pastor George Hunley of Louisa, Virginia, who earlier this year was arrested for falsely reporting to police he was robbed and shot by a black man.
Veterans were quick to detect inconsistencies in Hunley’s story.
“This guy made a big mistake by putting on that Navy Cross if he did not earn it because there are only a dozen or so who have earned the distinguished Navy Cross during the war on terror,” writes Michael Swaney at Popular Military. “There is no Mark Joston or “Josten” to be found on any list of Navy Cross recipients. However, there are three unidentified Navy SEALS who earned the Navy Cross during the global war on terrorism. So we cross referenced his name with the Navy Silver Star recipients and there is also no Mark Joston or Josten.”
After Swaney wrote about Joston, his readers pointed out a Raw Story post from February in which Hunley led police on a fabricated story that he’d been robbed and shot by an interracial couple he’d pulled over to try and assist on the road. His story fell apart at that time because police couldn’t find any evidence Hunley had been shot, and also found his wallet and checkbook, which he claimed had been taken in the incident.






http://www.rawstory.com/2015/10/pastor-caught-lying-about-black-robber-busted-again-for-pretending-to-be-a-navy-seal/

Another stolen valor story.
"A U.S. Army veteran noticed a curious thing at a recent convocation event at Jerry Falwell’s Liberty University. A graying man was wearing military dress uniform and badges that indicate what seemed like an impossible accumulation of achievements and commendations."



A U.S. Army veteran noticed a curious thing at a recent convocation event at Jerry Falwell’s Liberty University. A graying man was wearing military dress uniform…
RAWSTORY.COM



Sunday, January 12, 2014

On the hunt for military phonies

Good article by George Brennan!

On the hunt for military phonies
 
Top Photo
Glenn Marshall, Lawrence High School (Falmouth) yearbook, 1968
 
 
In August of 2007, C. Douglas Sterner's attention was drawn to a story in a Connecticut newspaper about a decorated Vietnam veteran at the forefront of the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe's fledgling casino pursuit.
 
Of interest to Sterner, himself the recipient of two Bronze Stars in that war, was a reference to then Mashpee Wampanoag Tribal Council Chairman Glenn Marshall earning not only the Silver Star, one of the military's highest honors, but also five Purple Hearts — the medal given to soldiers and Marines injured by the enemy in battle.
 
Something in that story in The Day newspaper didn't jibe with Sterner, who has worked for nearly a decade to do what the military has never done — create a database of medal recipients called the Hall of Valor. He'd never heard of the Marines handing out so many Purple Hearts.
 
He used his connections to do some research and quickly found Marshall's story had the all-too-familiar whiff of a phony. He tried, with little success, to tell The Day reporter she'd been duped.
Six days later, the Cape Cod Times reported Marshall's biography was littered with embellishments.
 
He had indeed served in Vietnam, but for four months. His frequently told story about being at the Battle of Khe Sanh in the spring of 1968 — to Vietnam-era Marines what Iwo Jima was to the few and proud in World War II — was completely bogus. Marshall was a senior at Lawrence High School in Falmouth while Marines fought back against the 77-day onslaught, the Times reported.
Marshall's lying, as well as a 1980 rape that was also uncovered by the Times, led to him initially stepping aside temporarily as tribe chairman and, ultimately, being ousted.
 
Sterner's role in uncovering Marshall's embellishments is detailed in a chapter of a new book written by him, his wife Pam Sterner and author Michael Mink called "Restoring Valor." The book is due to be released early next month by Skyhorse Publishing in New York.
 
"Stolen valor is still misunderstood. A lot of people see it as harmless — soldiers tell war stories — and not being as prevalent as it is or a major concern," Sterner said. "I took this on to help people realize that it is a prevalent and serious problem. It's not the lie. It's what they use it for."

PERPETUATING LIES

Marshall's tales began when the tribe was fighting for federal recognition, a key step in being able to get a tribal casino. In 2003, Marshall's biography helped motivate U.S. Rep. John T. Doolittle, a California Republican, to write a letter in support of the tribe's efforts. A year later, Marshall described himself as a "survivor of the Siege of Khe Sanh" during a congressional hearing.
 
By the time Marshall was exposed in 2007, the tribe had achieved federal recognition from the Bureau of Indian Affairs months earlier and was in hot pursuit of a $1 billion casino in Middleboro that appeared to be on the fast track. When Marshall was caught, tribe leadership was thrown into chaos and that fast moving train was derailed.
 
"It was all for himself," Sterner said of Marshall. "He was the poster boy for stolen valor."
 
In 2005, the Sterners, particularly Pam Sterner, were instrumental in getting a law passed called the Stolen Valor Act that makes it a federal crime to lie about military awards. The first law was overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2012 because of free speech concerns, but a revised law was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Obama last year that makes it a crime to fake military credentials for personal gain.
 
Marshall was never charged under the Stolen Valor Act, in part because the most egregious stories were told not by Marshall, but a tribe lobbyist. Marshall did tell the whopper about Khe Sanh himself, but no one pursued charges. It is a crime to lie to Congress.
 
Marshall would face other legal problems and ultimately went to federal prison for three years for stealing money from the tribe and making fraudulent campaign donations. He pleaded guilty.
Marshall, released in 2012 from federal prison, did not return a call seeking comment.
 
Uncovering phonies isn't what Sterner set out to do, but it became a byproduct of his database collecting. Weeks after the Times story was published, Sterner found that Marshall's bogus claims were part of a collection at the Library of Congress Veterans History Project — a valuable resource for a renowned Ken Burns documentary called "The War." Marshall had told his tale to some Barnstable Middle School students and the Library of Congress, which had no protocol in place to verify the stories that came in, included Marshall's.
 
It was a black eye for the project that had already suffered the embarrassment of having Sterner show that 24 of 49 entries claiming the Medal of Honor, the nation's highest military award, were fakes.
 
Marshall's audio tape has since been removed from the collection, the bogus Medal of Honor recipients have been weeded out, and the Library of Congress no longer publishes claims of medals.
 
"It's amazing how many people have a lot to be proud of and screw it up by wanting it to be more," Sterner said. "People do this because they can. There's no complete database for employers to look at employees or for a woman to see who her sweetheart really is. They get some personal gain out of perpetuating the lie."

'OUR SYSTEM WORKED'

"Restoring Valor" is filled with tales of false claims that have duped family members, friends, employers and politicians.
 
It also has another prominent Massachusetts angle, never before told publicly.
 
In 2012, while he was still in the U.S. Senate and locked in a tight race with Elizabeth Warren, then Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass., sponsored the Senate version of the revised Stolen Valor Act.
 
Doug Sterner had never met Brown, but was familiar with the senator. A few months earlier, Brown's staff had called Sterner seeking some women-friendly military statistics for a press conference. Sterner obliged.
 
Sterner's wife, Pam, had written the first Stolen Valor Act as a college student at the University of Colorado the year before it was approved. She told her husband she was going to write it as a project and get it passed.
 
Sterner didn't take the idea seriously. Not because he didn't believe it was a good one, but because he didn't believe Congress would go for it.
 
Pam Sterner, with the help of U.S. Rep. John Salazar, D-Colo., got the law passed in 2005. (Although, the bill that passed was actually an identical bill filed by a veteran Republican because of politics.)

In 2012, when the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Stolen Valor Act, citing concerns over the slippery slope it might have on free speech, the Sterners were disappointed but resilient.
 
"It wasn't really difficult because the American system worked," Doug Sterner said. "I hate hypocrisy. We say the Constitution is great up until it conflicts with something we like. Our system worked. I disagreed with decision of Supreme Court justices, but that was their decision. It was up to me to work within system and go back to drawing board and fix it."
 
In its decision, the Supreme Court had added a recommendation that was close to Sterner's heart.
 
They suggested the military ought to have a database of legitimate medal winners.
 
Buoyed by the support of the Obama administration in defending the Stolen Valor Act before the nation's highest court and seemingly bipartisan support to refile the legislation, the Sterners went to work on Capitol Hill. They welcomed Brown, a Republican, as sponsor in the Senate and helped get co-sponsors on the other side of the aisle.
 
Things went sour, though, before a press conference called in July of 2012 to announce the Stolen Valor Act. Doug Sterner got an email from U.S. Rep. Joseph Heck's office that "they" no longer wanted his wife, Pam, as a speaker during the press conference. The email came after a press advisory had already been sent out listing Pam Sterner as a speaker. "They" wanted him, a military veteran to speak, Doug Sterner said.

PARTISAN PLOY?

 
It was stinging blow to Doug Sterner, who knew how hard his wife had worked to convince everyone, including him, that the first Stolen Valor Act was a worthy cause. "She did an amazing job," he said.
 
Sterner wanted her there at that press conference. He made attempts to change the minds of the politicians involved. Sterner told Heck's staff in an email that without Pam on the dais, the press conference would have to go on without him, too.
 
In a phone call, a Heck staffer made it clear that "they" were firm — no Pam.
 
Sterner would find out the "they" was Brown, or at least Brown's staff. He was outraged.
 
"This is a guy who promotes himself as being women friendly and he dumped all over my wife," Sterner said. "I guess he thought I would be so impressed at being asked. It was the wrong thing to do."
 
Brown said he has no personal knowledge of why Sterner's wife was removed from the list of speakers. "I wouldn't care who spoke at a press conference," Brown said Wednesday.
 
In a follow-up message after consulting with his press secretary and chief of staff, Brown said the press conference was controlled by Heck's office. "We were merely asked to show and speak at it," he said. "We had no control over the speakers."
 
Days after the press conference, Sterner was quoted in a Huffington Post article saying he would vote for Warren if he lived in Massachusetts — though he insists that had more to do with her stance on health care. He was asked by that reporter why he had not participated in the press conference supporting the Stolen Valor Act, but declined to tell him on the record.
 
Sterner believes it was a mistake by Brown and his staff to exclude Pam Sterner. Brown, an active member of the Massachusetts National Guard, could have ridden the coattails of the new Stolen Valor Act in his tough campaign against Warren.
 
"You don't step on the little guy to get to the top because he can come back and bite you on the backside," Sterner said.
 
A day after the press conference, Brown made a speech on the Senate floor that Sterner believes delayed action on the bill.
 
"I'm hopeful that the commander in chief will lend his voice to this cause," Brown said, according to a videotape of his 2012 speech on the Senate floor. "To show leadership on this issue and to give his blessing so we can actually get to work on something that will truly pass, I would venture, 99-to-nothing, in this chamber."
 
It was seen by some as a partisan ploy, Sterner said.
 
"I thought it was a slap in the face to the Obama administration," Sterner said. "They had just defended the act before the Supreme Court."
 
To think that's what delayed the bill is naive on Sterner's part, Brown said. He was told in the Senate cloakroom that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid wouldn't allow the bill to go forward. "They weren't going to give me a victory that would help me get re-elected," Brown said.
 
The former senator, who has moved to New Hampshire and is seen as a possible candidate for U.S. Senate in that state, said he's disappointed that he's being criticized for a bill he sponsored and supported. "I never cared how it passed, as long as it passed," Brown said.
 
In May, the revised Stolen Valor Act passed unanimously in the U.S. Senate and by a 390-3 margin in the U.S. House.
 
After four years in Washington, D.C., the Sterners are back in Colorado where Doug works 12-14 hours a day building his database of real war heroes.
 
The message Sterner hopes readers will get out of the book? "One person, with a dream to do the right thing, if you work hard enough, you can do it."
 
 
 

Thursday, September 5, 2013

Veterans With Service Dogs Kicked Out Of Long John Silvers In Anniston Alabama

Revealing the ignorance of the law is shocking!

We recieved a response this morning from the owner of the Long John Silvers in Alabama, he is making contact with the Veterans this morning. See the link for the full update and his response:

http://guardianofvalor.com/two-veterans-service-dogs-kicked-long-john-silvers-anniston-alabama/
 
 

Two Veterans With Service Dogs Kicked Out Of Long John Silvers In Anniston Alabama

**********SEE UPDATES AT BOTTOM OF POST FOR LJS RESPONSE**************

We were contacted tonight by two Veterans(USMC and USAF) who were highly upset by the way they were treated when they visited a Long John Silver’s tonight in Anniston, Alabama. The Veterans both have registered Service dogs, and both dogs were also wearing their vests.

This is Reagan, a service dog trained by New Horizons Service Dogs out of Orange City, Florida.


Reagan
Reagan

This is Ranger, a service dog in training by 1 Boy 4 Change:
Ranger
Ranger

According to the Veterans this is how the event unfolded:

“On Wednesday, September 04, 2013, I, Amanda Houser, and Holly Bolesky went to grab a bite to eat at my local Long John Silver’s (hereby referred to as LJS). We entered the establishment, waited in line behind another couple for approximately two or three minutes, and then approached the counter to order our dinner.

We ordered, and our receipt is stamped at 1900:00:29 pm, today’s date. We grabbed our drink cups and went to fill them, then sat down at a table to wait. After sitting at this table for approximately two to three minutes, the person we later learned was the Manager on Duty approached us and stated that we could not have dogs inside the restaurant.

I informed her that they were service dogs and that everything was okay. She said that “folks have allergies” and that she couldn’t allow dogs inside and that we would have to leave. At this point, another customer at the table next to us said that these were service dogs and that she couldn’t tell us to leave and that she had dog allergies, and they weren’t bothering her a bit. I stated that I could call the police and have them clear up the matter if she preferred.

At this point, the Manager walked away. (This is the same person who took our order.) About three to four minutes after this first encounter, another employee approached us and said that she had spoken to her manager and that he said we could not have dogs inside unless we were blind, and again told us that we would have to leave since we weren’t blind. We again told her that these were service dogs and that she could not make us leave. She stated that we “should just go on ahead and call the cops then”. At this point, I obliged.

My call to the Anniston Police Department was logged from Holly’s cell phone at 1911 pm. I informed the dispatcher of the situation and stated that they wanted me to call them, and I requested that APD send someone out. He said they would send an Officer. At 1922, I logged a call to Janet Carswell, CEO of 1 Boy 4 Change, Inc (the organization I’m certified through), and left a message for her to call me when she got the chance.

At roughly 1925, the officer with APD showed up and went to speak with the manager while Holly and I continued to eat. By approximately 1926, the Officer was speaking with me outside the front of the restaurant. At 1928 Janet returned my call, which Holly answered. The officer asked what happened, so I filled him in on the situation and asked that he take care of it.

He stated that he didn’t know the law as it pertained to this situation, and I called Holly outside as she has had her service dog longer than I had. Holly walks outside and we tell the story again. The first thing he asks is “What are your dogs for?” I state that they are for PTSD. He does not seem to understand why he was called, we inform him of the laws for the state of Alabama, with Janet on speakerphone.

She even goes as far as to tell him the title code for the state law that makes it a misdemeanor to interfere with a disabled person with a service dog in Alabama. The cops dismissed this information and kept talking. At this point, he calls the manager back out. She states that she is “scared of dogs” and Holly and I both inform her that this is not our problem, as they are service dogs, and protected by State and Federal law, in the same manner that a “walker, crutch, or wheelchair” would be covered. She states that she does not care and that she must “look out for other customers who have food allergies or are afraid of dogs”.

Again, we state that, were that the case, we would be happy to move to another table, but it is still not our problem. She also tried to say that “foreign people and other businesses have different rules about dogs and stuff”. I assured her I have been every place imaginable with my dog and have never been kicked out. We reiterated that this is federal ADA law and is the same in every state. She claims her manager told her to call 911, so she told the officer that she reported we did not have any weapons when she was on the phone with 911 dispatchers.
Holly and I were both incredulous. How did this even turn to a 911 type of call and involve weapons of any sort??? We got no answer. We asked her if a customer walked in with a prosthetic limb if they would be allowed to stay, she stated they would be. We then told her that Service Dogs are considered medical equipment. She rolled her eyes and stated that this is different.

After a few minutes of discussion with her getting more and more agitated by the second, she tells us that we should have informed the manager on duty that we were disabled and had service dogs with us. We repeated that she was the one that took our order! She claimed to have not seen the dogs…… after a few more minutes of back and forth, she stated that she “ain’t gonna stand out here and argue with them all night Officer, so can you just take care of this I’m going back inside for my other customers.”

The officer says that we are egging her on and blowing this out of proportion and that he doesn’t see what the problem is. He also stated we should keep paperwork with us to help alleviate problems in the future. We told him we had it with us right then and she never asked us for anything, and neither did the officers. We inform him that we will be filing charges tomorrow and will finish eating and be on our way. At this point, we return inside and finish our meal. I clean our table and throw away our trash and we leave.

We called the restaurant at 2047 pm to get the names of the manager and the other employee involved, but no one answered the phone. The Officer stated that he will file a report and that I can pick up a copy of it tomorrow, and that it will be in both mine and Holly’s names just in case. As soon as I get a copy of the report, I will update this incident report with the names of the employees and officers involved.

We are embarrassed by the way we were treated and humiliated that we had to stand in front of the restaurant on a very busy road with two patrol cars and two officers. I am horrified by the way we were spoken to and treated. This should never have happened, and I will work to ensure it never happens again.”

There seems to be a lack of knowledge lately on the part of Law Enforcement when it comes to Federal law concerning service animals.

According to the ADA:
Under the ADA, State and local governments, businesses, and nonprofit organizations that serve the public generally must allow service animals to accompany people with disabilities in all areas of the facility where the public is normally allowed to go. For example, in a hospital it would be inappropriate to exclude a service animal from areas such as patient rooms, clinics, cafeterias, or examination rooms. However, it may be appropriate to exclude a service animal from operating rooms or burn units where the animal’s presence may compromise a sterile environment.
  • When it is not obvious what service an animal provides, only limited inquiries are allowed. Staff may ask two questions: (1) is the dog a service animal required because of a disability, and (2) what work or task has the dog been trained to perform. Staff cannot ask about the person’s disability, require medical documentation, require a special identification card or training documentation for the dog, or ask that the dog demonstrate its ability to perform the work or task.

  • Allergies and fear of dogs are not valid reasons for denying access or refusing service to people using service animals. When a person who is allergic to dog dander and a person who uses a service animal must spend time in the same room or facility, for example, in a school classroom or at a homeless shelter, they both should be accommodated by assigning them, if possible, to different locations within the room or different rooms in the facility.

  • A person with a disability cannot be asked to remove his service animal from the premises unless: (1) the dog is out of control and the handler does not take effective action to control it or (2) the dog is not housebroken. When there is a legitimate reason to ask that a service animal be removed, staff must offer the person with the disability the opportunity to obtain goods or services without the animal’s presence.

  • Establishments that sell or prepare food must allow service animals in public areas even if state or local health codes prohibit animals on the premises.

And according to Alabama law concerning the ADA:
Section 21-7-5
Penalty for denial of or interference with enumerated rights
.

Any person, firm or corporation, or the agent of any person, firm or corporation, who denies or interferes with admittance to or enjoyment of the public facilities enumerated in Sections 21-7-2 and 21-7-3 or otherwise interferes with the rights of a totally or partially blind or otherwise disabled person under Sections 21-7-2 through 21-7-4 shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

So this is the second incident in which an officer was called and did not know the law as it pertains to registered Service dogs, and Long John Silvers also needs to educate their employee’s that a Service dog is not just for “Blind People”!

The Long John Silver’s in question is at 631 Quintard Ave, Anniston AL 36201, the Facebook page for the national chain is located here:Long John Silvers

I think education is the biggest issue as this is the second incident where an Officer of the Law was unaware of the ADA. I am hoping these incidents start to decline as attention is brought to it and training is implemented. As more and more of our troops come back from over seas, and more wounded than in any other war, more service animals will be around. And it must be embarrassing for these Veterans when they are called out like this in front of people.
If you do contact LJS, please keep it polite and professional, that always leads to the best outcome.

UPDATE: 20130905
We received contact from Long John Silver’s this morning via Email and they asked that we post this response:
I work with Long John Silver’s and to share with you some information relating to your blog post. First, Long John Silver’s values all of our veterans and active duty military. The company has clear policies for restaurants about service dogs and the fact that service dogs are allowed in restaurants.
Long John Silver’s restaurants are independently owned and operated. The owner of the Anniston unit has asked me if you have email addresses for the 2 veterans. He would like to contact them personally to apologize.
Owners statement:
“As the owner of the Anniston Long John Silver’s, I want to apologize to the veterans who visited my restaurant yesterday. One of our staff members was not fully aware of the important role that service dogs fill for veterans. We have talked with all of our team members at the restaurant and emphasized that service dogs fill a number of important roles for people. We have also emphasized the gratitude and respect we hold for all of our veterans.
We are making a donation to New Horizons Service Dogs of Orange City, Florida, to help support their important work. In addition, we invite the two veterans and their immediate families and service dogs back to Long John Silver’s to allow us to show our gratitude for their service.

Dr. Adel El-Sahn
Owner

Long John Silver’s, Anniston, Alabama”
We want to thank the Owner for his quick response, and he ensures us that his employee’s should have been aware of the law as it pertains to the ADA. And that he personally ensured that this point was made this morning. We are working on putting him in touch with the Veterans.

UPDATE: 20130905
The owner and the Veterans are making contact with each other as we speak, also the owner had this sign put up this morning.

LJS
We will update this story as we get more information.