Search This Blog

Translate

Blog Archive

Middleboro Review 2

NEW CONTENT MOVED TO MIDDLEBORO REVIEW 2

Toyota

Since the Dilly, Dally, Delay & Stall Law Firms are adding their billable hours, the Toyota U.S.A. and Route 44 Toyota posts have been separated here:

Route 44 Toyota Sold Me A Lemon



Showing posts with label back room deals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label back room deals. Show all posts

Monday, February 15, 2016

MASSterList: Patrick's high-court chances less than Supreme | Is late night T already gone? | Why Mass may not matter on Super Tuesday



PLEASE KEEP WATCHING THE MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL ELECTRIC TAXPAYER SCAM!

KEEP WATCHING THE WEALTHY WHITE GUYS' BRAIN FART TO REMOVE THE PUBLIC FROM PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION!



 

Monday, February 15, 2016



By George Donnelly (@geodonnelly) and Sara Brown
Today: Presidential portrayals

The John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum hosts a Presidents Day festival with actors portraying Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson and John and Abigail Adams. The event will close out with a performance by the Harvard Din & Tonics, featuring Kennedy campaign songs. It's at the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library, Columbia Point, Boston, 10 am.
Presidents Day is a traditional high water time for the industry and area dealers say the record cold temperatures aren't keeping buyers away, according to the MetroWest Daily News. http://bit.ly/1QCPohE

By the way, here are the top-selling cars and light trucks in the U.S. in 2015:
Ford F Series: 780,354
Chevrolet Silverado: 600,544
Ram Pickup: 451,116
Toyota Camry: 429,355
Toyota Corolla: 363,322
Total car and light truck sales in 2015: 17.5 million (a record)
How cold was it? 
The record-shattering cold has had its share of impacts on transportation, but the timing over a long weekend couldn't have been much better. The Associated Press reported that the MBTA saw delays on its Red, Orange and Green lines due to various mechanical problems as well as cracking of rails as the mercury plunged to a record 9 below zero on Sunday morning. http://bit.ly/1QgY9NW



Patrick gets mentions as possible Supreme 
As news of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia's death on Saturday spread rapidly through political circles, one name that quickly popped up, according to Jack Encarnacao of the Herald, is that of former Gov. Deval Patrick. A close confidante of President Obama, Patrick would have the benefit of not having a lengthy track record of legal decisions the Senate could parse and re-parse but does have a background in Constitutional (and corporate) law. Some Bay State Democrats were eager to back the idea of nominating Patrick. But given the promise of Senate Republicans to fight Obama if he chooses to make a pick--some in the GOP immediately called for Obama to leave the seat vacant until after the election--the chances that Patrick, now a partner at Bain Capital, could be confirmed may be quite slim in reality. Observers say if Obama is to get a nominee confirmed before he leaves office, it will have to be a much more moderate choice. "It's just not going to happen," GOP consultant Patrick Griffin says of Patrick's odds.http://bit.ly/1PMjnUC
Manhole cover incident spurs state investigation
State highway workers examined 919 manhole covers following the death of Caitlin Clavette, an art teacher at a Milton elementary school who was killed by an airborne manhole cover while driving in the Thomas P. O'Neill tunnel Friday morning on her way to work. The state reported it"found nothing to indicate a threat to public safety" in its review. While it was a rare and horrific occurrence and safety inspections were up to date, the victim's family deserves answers. State police are continuing to investigate. Globe correspondent Aneri Pattani filed this story on the victim and the many people who loved and admired her. http://bit.ly/20UUvVe


GE has history of property tax battles
General Electric is aggressive about contesting property assessments, challenging its tax bills in many jurisdictions over the years, the Globe's Beth Healy reports. "Officials in those communities say GE tenaciously pursues property tax abatements, particularly after it has received higher assessments or downsized in locations where it maintained large plants," writes Healy. http://bit.ly/1ohzkvl
  
Outside money pouring into ballot campaigns
Donations from outside of Massachusetts are pouring in to support state ballot initiatives, reflecting the agendas of national organizations, particularly marijuana legalization and farm animal protections, reports Shira Schoenberg of MassLive. The Campaign to Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol has raised nearly $200,000 from out-of-state donors, 44 percent of its total. The Humane Society of the United States has contributed $1.26 million to the farm animal ballot initiative, Schoenberg reports. http://bit.ly/1oCyw4i
Regan loses UMass business
On the heels of having its contract terminated at Suffolk University, Regan Communications is on the cusp of losing a sizable engagement with the UMass Building Authority, which has been paying Regan $10,000 per month for several years. The deal was cut when Robert Sheridan, a close friend of George Regan, was chair of the authority board. The authority's director said the decision to drop the contract was part of a cost-savings effort, reports Laura Krantz of the Globe.

The end of 'back-room deals'? 
The Globe's Adrian Walker writes that Regan has quickly become the embodiment of the 'back-room deal' and expresses hope that the unraveling of the contracts means the times they-are-a-changing: "At the risk of being overly optimistic, I believe that the fallout from the Suffolk fiasco will force change in the way business is conducted in Boston. The common denominator here, besides Regan himself, is that these were all back-room deals."  http://bit.ly/1QhfXZr

Is late night T service already chopped? 
Although the MBTA's Fiscal Control Board is still weighing a decision on wether to continue the T's late night service, there are signs it is already on the outs, the Globe's Nicole Dungca reports. Union officials tells the Globe that drivers were told not to worry about picking up after-hours shifts beginning on March 19. A spokesman says no decision has been made; a vote on the fate of the money-losing wee-hours service is expected on Feb. 29.  http://bit.ly/1RFa8dC

Officials lift cap on medical marijuana 
Regulators have more than doubled the amount of medical marijuana patients can obtain after determining that the necessary safeguards are in place to test the product, Kay Lazar of the Globe reports. Patients can now get up to 10 ounces of marijuana every two months, up from the 4.23 ounce cap that had been in place since medical marijuana sales began in the state. http://bit.ly/20yGNC4


Regulators want Boston Children''s expansion put in perspective 
The Department of Public Health wants Boston Children's Hospital to demonstrate the $1 billion plan being developed to expand its footprint won't undercut efforts to slow the rise of health care costs, Priyanka Dayal McCluskey of the Globe reports. DPH says its wants an independent analysis showing whether the project is consistent with ongoing efforts to keep health care costs increases in check. http://bit.ly/1QhcoSW 

Will Mass. matter on Super Tuesday?  
Massachusetts may get lost in the shuffle when its turn in the Presidential Primary  comes on March 1, Douglas Moser of the Eagle-Tribune reports. With hundreds of delegates up for grabs in large southern states poised to cast ballots on the same day, many candidates are expected to keep their attention focused there leading up to Super Tuesday.  http://bit.ly/1mCvDi5

Worcester wants to pay less in panhandle case 
The city of Worcester is asking a Federal court to dramatically reduce the amount of legal fees it has to pay after its local ordinance aimed at keeping panhandlers out of downtown was deemed unconstitutional, Steven H. Foskett Jr. of the Telegram reports. Worcester called the $1 million in fees sought by the ACLU and its law firm, Goodwin Procter "avaricious, contemptible and punitive" and said the hourly rates the attorneys charged are out of whack for the Worcester area.  http://bit.ly/1ofTk0R




REMEMBER: To send your tips to me at gdonnelly@massterlist.com. Op-eds and other commentary are invited for publication on MASSterList.
Subscribe now for free!


TODAY'S TOP STORIES
National headlines 
State headlines 

Local headlines 

Sunday, January 4, 2015

Suffolk Downs survived again






Suffolk Downs survived again

Before the lights truly went dark on Suffolk Downs, Patrick received a bill for his approval extending the former horse track's simulcasting rights through March, giving the track owners three additional months to figure out what comes next after losing out on a casino license.

Sen. Anthony Petruccelli, who sponsored the original bill that would have let Suffolk Downs takes bets on out-of-state races through July 2016 without any live racing of its own, painted the move as a job saver, linking simulcasting to 100 Eastie jobs. Art courtesy of Wikipedia.

Stop Predatory Gambling and the leaders of Repeal the Casino Deal were quick to jump on an amendment slipped into a banking reform bill on Christmas Eve that would have revised the state's policy on ATMs at casinos.

Sen. Stephen Brewer, who will retire from the Legislature next week, attempted to use the banking bill as a vehicle to clarify state regulations that currently ban cash machines from the "premises" of gambling facilities. The amendment would have restricted ATMs to areas off the gaming floor.

While Brewer and backers say the change was necessary to create a level playing field between state and federal banks and address confusion about the Legislature's intent for ATMs in the 2011 casino gaming law, the swift outrage from anti-gambling groups worried about giving problem gamblers access to quick cash caused the House and Senate to back down on New Year's Eve.

With Attorney General-elect Maura Healey joining the chorus for more deliberation, the banking bill was sent to Patrick without any changes to casino ATM rules.



http://www.capecodtoday.com/article/2015/01/03/28370-was-week-was-state-politics


Monday, December 29, 2014

MA Legislature attempts to secretly hand ATMs to casinos in end-of-year lobbying push



MA Legislature attempts to secretly hand ATMs to casinos in end-of-year lobbying push

End-of-year informal sessions in the legislature are somewhat notorious for sneaking through substantial policy shifts like this one. Keep your eyes open. - promoted by david
 




On Christmas Eve morning, when virtually no media, citizens or other state legislators were paying attention to legislative business, the Massachusetts Senate approved an amendment during informal session that would allow ATMs inside casinos. This stunning action occurred even though the intent of informal session is to move non-controversial legislation.
Casino ATMs are one of the most predatory and financially damaging business practices used by casinos and they were expressly prohibited when the casino law was signed by Governor Deval Patrick. The ban on ATMs was a core part of the political narrative that Patrick and other casino sponsors sold the public: “We’re going to do casinos right, better than everyone else.”
Why are casino ATMs an issue that you should care about and act on? A leading indicator of someone who is being harmed and financially damaged by casinos is if he or she chases their losses. ATMs are the primary vehicle used by casinos to lure citizens to chase. Their business model hinges on it. Over the last decade there are 11 different independent studies – studies not funded by gambling interests – that show 40%-60% of slot machine profits are taken from citizens who can’t stop chasing their losses.
This is how it works: A citizen goes into the casino and loses all their cash or the “free play” voucher mailed to them by the casino (most often, they lose it all on slot machines which predominate inside casinos.) This is a pivotal moment for the casino…can they get that citizen to chase his or her losses? Slot machine design and free alcohol are two of the critical factors that lure citizens to chase. If the casino is successful, then the next step is the citizen hits the casino ATM to withdraw more money. Most casino ATMs are owned by Global Cash Access (GCA) which then turns around and sells the name, credit info and other information of that citizen back to the casino. Then the casino focuses its most intense marketing efforts against that citizen because they know that if they can get him or her to return to the casino and keep gambling, it is almost inevitable that citizen will keep losing, chasing their losses over and over again. From a casino marketing standpoint, it is the equivalent of painting the citizen in neon orange fluorescent paint with a massive bulls eye on their back.
Removing the state’s ban on ATMs inside casinos does not qualify as “non-controversial” and no such legislation should be moved during informal legislative session. It is a major consumer protection issue that merits bright sunshine.
I ask everyone to please contact your state representative and state senator today or first thing Monday morning and call on them to remove the amendment language approving casino ATMs in House Bill 4110. You can find the contact info for your rep and for your senator here. You can view the full legislative history for House Bill 4110 here.
To learn more about Global Cash Access and their predatory and harmful business practices, I invite you to watch one of their own marketing videos:
 








Repeal of ATM casino ban is in bold.
Banking Laws
Mr. Brewer moved that the bill be amended by striking out, in line 15, the figure “1206” and inserting in place thereof the following figure:- “1026”; and
by striking out, in line 75, the words “federal Community Reinvestment Act of 1977” and inserting in place thereof the following words:- “community reinvestment act in section 14”; and
by inserting after section 27 the following section:-
“SECTION 27A. The second paragraph of section 3 of said chapter 167B, as so appearing, is hereby amended by striking out the last sentence.”; and
by striking out, in lines 359 and 360, the words:- “; provided, however, that “financial institution” shall mean a bank for the purposes of the first, second and third paragraphs of section 3 and for the purposes of section 4”; and
by striking out, in line 834, the words “; provided, however, such” and inserting in place thereof the following words:- “. If, in the opinion of the commissioner, there is an unusual demand by depositors for withdrawals, the bank shall upon the commissioner’s order require such a depositor to give written notice of the depositor’s intention to withdraw the whole or any part of such deposits or to apply for a loan secured by such deposit. Such”; and
by striking out, in lines 1140 and 2212, the word “consistent” and inserting in place thereof the following words:- “not inconsistent”; and
by adding the following section:- “SECTION 65. Notwithstanding any general or special law to the contrary, the Massachusetts gaming commission shall prohibit a gaming licensee from (i) installing, owning or operating an automated teller machine in the gaming area, as defined in section 2 of chapter 23K of the General Laws, or (ii) allowing another person to install, own or operate an automated teller machine in the gaming area, as defined in said section 2 of said chapter 23K. For the purposes of this section, the prohibition shall include, but not be limited to, an automated teller machine or electronic branch of any state or federally-chartered bank, state or federally-chartered credit union or foreign bank.”
 
 
 


 

Sunday, December 28, 2014

MA Legislature is attempting to secretly hand ATMs to casinos






On Christmas Eve morning, when virtually no media, citizens or other state legislators were paying attention to legislative business, the Massachusetts Senate approved an amendment during informal session that would allow ATMs inside casinos. This stunning action occurred even though the intent of informal session is to move non-controversial legislation. Please take 5 minutes tonight or Monday morning to call both your MA state rep and state senator and tell them to remove the amendment language approving casino ATMs in House Bill 4110. Here's why.

Casino ATMs are one of the most predatory and financially damaging business practices used by casinos and they were expressly prohibited when the casino law was signed by Governor Deval Patrick. The ban on ATMs was a core part of the political narrative that Patrick and other casino sponsors sold the public: "We're going to do casinos right, better than everyone else."

Why are casino ATMs an issue that you should care about and act on? A leading indicator of someone who is being harmed and financially damaged by casinos is if he or she chases their losses. ATMs are the primary vehicle used by casinos to lure citizens to chase. Their business model hinges on it. Over the last decade there are 11 different independent studies – studies not funded by gambling interests - that show 40%-60% of slot machine profits are taken from citizens who can’t stop chasing their losses.

This is how it works: A citizen goes into the casino and loses all their cash or the "free play" voucher mailed to them by the casino (most often, they lose it all on slot machines which predominate inside casinos.) This is a pivotal moment for the casino...can they get that citizen to chase his or her losses? Slot machine design and free alcohol are two of the critical factors that lure citizens to chase. If the casino is successful, then the next step is the citizen hits the casino ATM to withdraw more money. Most casino ATMs are owned by Global Cash Access (GCA) which then turns around and sells the name, credit info and other information of that citizen back to the casino. Then the casino focuses its most intense marketing efforts against that citizen because they know that if they can get him or her to return to the casino and keep gambling, it is almost inevitably that citizen will keep losing, chasing their losses over and over again. From a casino marketing standpoint, it is the equivalent of painting the citizen in neon orange fluorescent paint with a massive bulls eye on their back.

Removing the state's ban on ATMs inside casinos does not qualify as "non-controversial" and no such legislation should be moved during informal legislative session. It is a major consumer protection issue that merits bright sunshine.

I ask everyone to please contact your state representative and state senator today or first thing Monday morning and call on them to remove the amendment language approving casino ATMs in House Bill 4110. You can find the contact info for your rep and for your senator here. You can view the full legislative history for House Bill 4110 here.

To learn more about Global Cash Access and their predatory and harmful business practices, I invite you to watch one of their own marketing videos here.

Thanks for exercising your power to act on this issue.

Best,

Les

____________

Les Bernal

National Director

Stop Predatory Gambling

"End the dishonesty and harm of government-sponsored gambling and the unfairness and inequality it creates."

If you support our mission and work, please become a member of Stop Predatory Gambling today.


Stop Predatory Gambling Foundation ι 100 Maryland Avenue NE, Room 310 ι Washington, D.C. 20002 ι (202) 567-6996

 

logo

Quick Links

An American Declaration on Government and Gambling

Online Store

SPG in the Media

Take Action

A Failed Government Policy

Lies vs. Facts

Background Reading

Share Your Story

Donate To The Mission

Stop Predatory Gambling Foundation ι 100 Maryland Avenue NE, Room 310 ι Washington, D.C. 20002 ι (202) 567-6996
©2013 Stop Predatory Gambling Foundation. All rights reserved.