The constant fear mongering of hate media like Fox News along with the blatant racism used by the Republican leadership for personal political gain makes them culpable for the radicalization and violence caused by their irresponsible actions.
"according to the legal definition of criminal solicitation;
“a person is guilty of solicitation to commit a crime if, with the purpose of promoting or facilitating its commission, they command, encourage or request another person to engage in specific conduct which would constitute such crime or an attempt to commit such crime or which would establish his complicity in its commission or attempted commission. It is immaterial that the actor fails to communicate with the person he solicits to commit a crime if his conduct was designed to effect such a communication.”
Now, under that definition, it is beyond refute that the Republicans and conservative media calling on other Americans to take action to correct some perceived wrong, like being Hispanic, Middle Eastern, belonging to the wrong religion or providing a legal medical service, are guilty of “criminal solicitation.”
Now, under that definition, it is beyond refute that the Republicans and conservative media calling on other Americans to take action to correct some perceived wrong, like being Hispanic, Middle Eastern, belonging to the wrong religion or providing a legal medical service, are guilty of “criminal solicitation.”
Occupy Democrats
Kudos to Riviera Beach for doing the right thing.
Chad Micheal You left out a couple of key points. The Sanders campaign had reported the firewall issue as far back as October and it was never fixed. Were audits run then? The Sanders campaign attempted to comply on Thursday, the day after the breach and day before the suspension, but received no response from the DNC. Similar things have happened in the past, according to Howard Dean, but never previously aired in public. Finally, the Sanders campaign itself has requested an audit if ALL data protection measures and not just this episode.
Occupy Democrats
The Force is strong in this one.
Image by Occupy Democrats, 'LIKE' our page for more!
MARCO RUBIO: HIGHEST ABSENTEEISM RATE
The latest in a series of rookie mistakes for Marco Rubio
Marco Rubio has generally avoided going after his Republican presidential rivals, largely because he hasn’t felt the need to do so. But as the new year approaches and the race reaches a more intense stage, the Florida senator realizes that he’s not quite where he needs to be – and waiting for the candidates ahead of him to falter is probably a recipe for failure.
With this in mind, in Tuesday night’s debate, Rubio took aim at Ted Cruz for having voted against an annual military bill – the National Defense Authorization Act (or NDAA) – more than once.
“Three times he voted against the Defense Authorization Act, which is a bill that funds the troops,” Rubio said of his Texas competitor. “It also, by the way, funds the Iron Dome and other important programs.”
Note the Iron Dome reference, a subtle way for Rubio to suggest Cruz doesn’t support U.S. troops and doesn’t support Israel. Did I mention that Republican megadonor Sheldon Adelson, who uses support for Israel as a litmus test for candidates, was in the front row at the time?
Cruz explained his vote and pushed back against what he saw as a cheap line of attack, but the Texas senator overlooked an even more important detail, whichBuzzFeed flagged:
Marco Rubio attacked Ted Cruz during Tuesday’s CNN debate for voting against the annual bill that authorizes military spending for the following fiscal year, but Rubio missed this year’s vote to campaign in New Hampshire. […]One of Cruz’s “nay” votes came on Oct. 7, in a vote Rubio missed. The bill passed 70-27, despite Rubio’s absence.
Rubio also missed the “procedural vote that led to the bill’s passing.”
In other words, Rubio is outraged that Cruz didn’t vote for the NDAA – which Rubio considered so important that he skipped the vote altogether. It’s a rookie mistake, and it’s hardly the first for the young Floridian.
At its root, the line of attack is itself misguided. Plenty of members, in both parties, have voted against NDAA bills many times, for many reasons. It doesn’t mean they’re unpatriotic or somehow hostile to the U.S. military. Rubio may struggle at times with substantive nuance, but this really isn’t especially complicated.
For that matter, Yahoo News published a piece yesterday noting that Rubio himself has also voted more than once against spending packages that fund the military.
But the more glaring mistake is Rubio characterizing the NDAA vote as critically important, without realizing that he didn’t even bother to show up for work when the bill reached the Senate floor. For all the media hype about Rubio’s debate performances, every time we look a little closer at the details, some important flaws become more obvious.
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/the-latest-series-rookie-mistakes-marco-rubio?cid=sm_fb_maddow
"he wants millions of evangelical Christians to go and vote for politicians who would basically turn this country into a theocracy. Furthermore, let me emphasize how “classy” it is for a presidential candidate to happily speak to an organization which is classified as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center. It’s also interesting Mr. “Pro-Israel” Ted Cruz would speak to an organization whose members have been linked to anti-Jew rhetoric"
"How could the American people trust Ted Cruz to be Commander In Chief when he can’t keep classified information to himself during a presidential debate? The CNN debate was a showcase for not ready for primetime candidates in the Republican Party. The Republican field ranges from candidates who are out of touch (Jeb Bush), untrustworthy (Cruz) to unfit to be Commander In Chief (Trump and Carson). However, if Cruz leaked classified information, he would move to the top of the Republican incompetence heap."
PoliticusUSA shared a link.
"America was at the height of “its greatness” when the nation was home to a large and economically-powerful middle class bolstered by strong unions. However, like anything good in America, the middle class is on its deathbed after Republican attacks and they are making it impossible to ever recover.
There has been much said and written about how Republicans oppose closing the income gap because their religion dictates giving all the nation’s wealth to the rich and increasing the number of Americans in low-wage jobs and poverty. No semi-sane human being can possibly dispute that easily-proven, and historically accurate, fact."
This should NEVER have been a 'fight'!
PLEASE remember this was REPUBLICANS!
The fight for 9/11 first responders' health care wasn't easy.
But the efforts paid off in the end.
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2015/12/17/1461159/-Dr-Ben-Carson-Republicans-have-a-mental-disorder?detail=email
FOX NEWS = FAKE NEWS = CULT
Duh?
Recirculating, a festive and fabricated claim that President Obama banned all Christmas cards sent to overseas servicemen:
Occupy Democrats
Forty-seven years later, this chickenhawk has never been healthier.
What took 'em so long?
"While Republicans across the country stir up a fear-mongering frenzy about Islamic terrorism, the real threat to American safety comes from radicals in their own party. The New York Times conducted a survey of 382 law enforcement agencies across the country, and 74% of them reported that right wing, anti-government extremism to be in the top three terrorist threats in their jurisdiction,"
Don't blame VOTERS!
Blame the BOGUS ELECTIONS!
http://middlebororeview.blogspot.com/search?q=Kentucky+Election
http://middlebororeview.blogspot.com/search?q=ES%26S
The self proclaimed party of stupid rides again.
"Tea Party elect, Governor Matt Bevin, ran on a platform promising to completely remove the Kentucky state exchange as well as removing the Medicaid expansion so many poor Republican Kentuckians relied on. So of course, Republicans voted for him in droves."
Johnson was destroyed. It wasn’t his integrity or claims that got him in trouble, his facts were solid. Instead, it was the inconvenient truth that much of the threat comes from right-wing conservatives, and even more awkwardly, radical right-wing conservatives who say and think a lot of the same things mainstream right-wing conservatives say and think"
No comments:
Post a Comment