Search This Blog

Translate

Blog Archive

Middleboro Review 2

NEW CONTENT MOVED TO MIDDLEBORO REVIEW 2

Toyota

Since the Dilly, Dally, Delay & Stall Law Firms are adding their billable hours, the Toyota U.S.A. and Route 44 Toyota posts have been separated here:

Route 44 Toyota Sold Me A Lemon



Showing posts with label GREEN NEW DEAL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GREEN NEW DEAL. Show all posts

Thursday, December 12, 2019

Impeachment as National Security: The Framers' Intentions




Reader Supported News
12 December 19

A Moment to Honor Those Who Sustain RSN
The problem of people who use Reader Supported News but will not contribute is so serious that it often overshadows the efforts of those who are quite willing to help sustain the organization, and there are many.
We are a long way from finished for December. Let’s take a moment however to thank sincerely our sustainers, large and small each and every one.
In solidarity.
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News
Sure, I'll make a donation!

Update My Monthly Donation

If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts
CA 95611






Reader Supported News
11 December 19
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


Impeachment as National Security: The Framers' Intentions
Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders. (photo: Mary Schwalm/AP)
Charles Edel, Lawfare
Edel writes: "Fearful of the potential for unlimited, arbitrary or tyrannical exercise of power by an unprincipled president, the Constitution's authors allowed Congress to remove a president before the completion of his term if a sufficient number of lawmakers concluded that the president had committed 'Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.'"
READ MORE

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders. (photo: Mary Schwalm/AP)
Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders. (photo: Mary Schwalm/AP)
Bernie Sanders Has a Plan to Turn the Internet Into a Public Utility With Low Prices and Fast Speeds - Here's How It Works
Ben Gilbert, Business Insider
Gilbert writes: "Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders just unveiled a sweeping billion proposal that would fundamentally reshape how the internet works in the United States."
READ MORE

Speaker Nancy Pelosi. (photo: Alex Wong/Getty)
Speaker Nancy Pelosi. (photo: Alex Wong/Getty)
Cameron Joseph, VICE
Joseph writes: "On Tuesday morning, House Democrats unveiled their articles of impeachment against President Trump. Just one hour later, they handed him a key policy victory."

EXCERPT:
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and House Democrats announced Tuesday that they’ve hammered out a deal to support the USMCA, a trade agreement between the United States, Mexico and Canada that updates and revises NAFTA. 
If the deal passes Congress it’ll be Trump’s biggest policy victory since Republicans slashed corporate and personal tax rates two years ago — and could prove to be a huge political win for Trump, shoring up his populist bona fides for the 2020 election.
“Trump is going to take the fact that there was a bipartisan deal to say his trade policy is working,” Jeff Hauser, a Democratic strategist with deep ties to the labor movement, told VICE News. Pelosi's "wrong on the substance and dangerously wrong on the politics.”

Trump’s 2016 wins were fueled in part by his fierce criticism of international trade deals like NAFTA — a message that helped him sweep through the Midwest. Democrats struck back and won big in 2018 largely by painting him as a phony and a hypocrite on economic issues, hammering him and Republicans for failing to improve infrastructure and threatening voters’ healthcare while slashing tax rates for rich people and big corporations. 


President Trump speaking at Israeli-American Council summit. (photo: Getty)
President Trump speaking at Israeli-American Council summit. (photo: Getty)



'A Dangerous Move to Silence Free Speech': Jewish Groups React to Trump's Plan to Designate Judaism as a Nationality
Clark Mindock, The Independent
Mindock writes: "Donald Trump's plan to designate Judaism as a 'nationality' through executive order has been met with criticism by progressive Jewish organizations, who say the proposal is just another act of antisemitism from the president."
READ MORE

Kathleen Eaton Bravo's remarks show how xenophobic fears about immigrants 'replacing' white Christian populations have influenced anti-choice campaigners in the US. (photo: YouTube)
Kathleen Eaton Bravo's remarks show how xenophobic fears about immigrants 'replacing' white Christian populations have influenced anti-choice campaigners in the US. (photo: YouTube)

ALSO SEE: Doctors Arrested While Offering Flu Vaccines
for Immigrants in Border Patrol Custody
CBP Denies Access to Doctors Seeking Flu Vaccinations for Migrant Children
Wendy Fry, The San Diego Union-Tribune
Fry writes: "Doctors say they will come back each day to administer free flu shots until they are successful."
READ MORE

Kathleen Eaton Bravo's remarks show how xenophobic fears about immigrants 'replacing' white Christian populations have influenced anti-choice campaigners in the US. (photo: YouTube)
Kathleen Eaton Bravo's remarks show how xenophobic fears about immigrants 'replacing' white Christian populations have influenced anti-choice campaigners in the US. (photo: YouTube)

Prominent Anti-Abortion Chief Warned of Muslims 'Replacing' Christian Europeans
Stephanie Kirchgaessner, Guardian UK
Kirchgaessner writes: "The chief executive of Obria, an anti-choice and anti-contraception organization that has been awarded millions of dollars in grants by the Trump administration, once said that Christianity was dying out thanks to contraception and abortion, leading Europeans to be 'replaced' by immigrant Muslims."

Kathleen Eaton Bravo, whose company Obria has taken millions from Trump, said abortion ‘threatens our culture’s survival’

he chief executive of Obria, an anti-choice and anti-contraception organisation that has been awarded millions of dollars in grants by the Trump administration, once said that Christianity was dying out thanks to contraception and abortion, leading Europeans to be “replaced” by immigrant Muslims.
The reported remarks by Kathleen Eaton Bravo, the founder and chief executive officer of the Obria Group, raise new questions about the Trump administration’s controversial decision to award millions of dollars in health and human services grants to the group, which runs a national network of health centers opposed to abortion and contraception.
Bravo’s remarks, which were published in a 2015 interview with the Catholic World Report, shows how xenophobic fears about immigrants from African and Middle Eastern countries “replacing” white Christian populations have influenced anti-choice campaigners in the US.
In the interview, Bravo was asked whether abortion was getting the attention it deserved. She said it was not, because abortion had become a political rather than a moral issue.
“Few realize that it has had a devastating impact on our society, and threatens our culture’s survival. Take the example of Europe. When its nations accepted contraception and abortion, they stopped replacing their population. Christianity began to die out. And, with Europeans having no children, immigrant Muslims came in to replace them, and now the culture of Europe is changing,” she said.
The idea that white people are being “replaced” by non-whites and non-Christians has long been a fallacy propagated by white supremacists. The chants “you will not replace us” and “Jews will not replace us” were used by white supremacists in Charlottesville in 2017 and were part of the racist ideology espoused by mass shooters in El Paso and New Zealand.
Bravo also said in the interview that the US was bound to follow in Europe’s footsteps.
“In only two of the past 40 years have we replaced our population. We’re on the same track as Europe. The church and family are in crisis,” she said.
The Guardian attempted to reach Bravo for comment but she did not return a detailed message left for her at her office, or an email message sent through the group’s website.
The Obria chief has emerged as a force in the conservative and Catholic anti-choice movement that has sought to siphon public funds away from healthcare clinics like Planned Parenthood, which provide reproductive care and abortion services.
Obria received a $1.7m grant from the Trump administration in March 2019 and is due to receive an additional $3.4m over the next two years. The designation is controversial because such federal family planning funds – known as title X funding – was until recently only offered to groups that offered women access to contraception and referrals and counseling for abortion services.
Clinics were already barred from using title X money to directly provide abortions, but new restrictions imposed by the Trump administration have made it illegal for staff at health clinics that receive federal funds – which mostly help poor women – from referring patients to other facilities where they can terminate their pregnancies.
Planned Parenthood, which has for years been vilified by anti-choice campaigners, previously operated about 40% of the clinics that serve poor women, and received about $60m in family planning funds from the federal government annually. It left the title X program this year, however, after the new Trump administration restrictions on counseling and referrals went into effect. Planned Parenthood said at the time that the move would lead to suffering for its patients, and that the gag rule was both unethical and illegal.
Bravo was highly critical of Planned Parenthood in the 2015 interview, suggesting that the group promoted a “hook-up” culture and “oral sex, anal sex, and S&M sex”.
An investigation by the Campaign for Accountability, a not-for-profit watchdog group, found that Obria’s quest to win grant money from HHS was supported by political appointees at the department, including Diane Foley, who is in charge of title X funding. Foley congratulated Bravo in an email after Obria won its 2019 grant, and invited Bravo to have a private call with her to discuss the funding.
HHS did not return a request for comment about Bravo’s remarks.
Alice Huling, CFA’s counsel, told the Guardian that HHS has said that changes to its title X program were designed to diversify its grant applications. But Huling said that in reality, the change has given groups like Obria, which do not provide contraception or abortion-related services, access to federal funds for the first time, possibly opening the “floodgates” for similar organizations to win grants that would otherwise have gone to organizations that do provide such services.
The Guardian reported earlier this year that Obria has also received $150,000 in free advertising from Google, even though the group has run deceptive ads that suggest its clinics provide abortion services. The ads are designed to attract “abortion-minded women” to the clinics, even though they cannot obtain abortion services.
Google changed its advertising policy in the wake of the Guardian’s report, and has started publishing information under some of its ads that state whether the clinics do or do not provide termination services.


Students demonstrating in support of a Green New Deal. (photo: Getty)
Students demonstrating in support of a Green New Deal. (photo: Getty)

The New Deal Funded the Arts. The Green New Deal Should, Too.
Ashley Dawson, In These Times
Dawson writes: "Cultural work needs to be seen as a vitally important part of the new green economy."
READ MORE








Saturday, December 7, 2019

FOCUS: Why Bernie Sanders Could Be the Democrats' Best Hope in 2020





Reader Supported News
07 December 19

A public news option - must- have public support. It’s that simple. This organization can thrive with 1% of its subscribers contributing on a monthly basis. But without it we cannot survive at all.
Right now we are not getting that. You have to step up.
Donate and watch the good that comes.
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News


If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 9561



Reader Supported News
07 December 19
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


FOCUS: Why Bernie Sanders Could Be the Democrats' Best Hope in 2020
Sen. Bernie Sanders. (photo: Getty)
Arslan Malik, New Statesman
Malik writes: "In the last few weeks, centrist Democrats, including former US president Barack Obama, have expressed concern about Democratic primary candidates moving too far to the left, as Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, the top progressive candidates, continue to command a major share of grassroots support."


For many voters, Sanders offers the strongest repudiation of the current president.

n the last few weeks, centrist Democrats, including former US president Barack Obama, have expressed concern about Democratic primary candidates moving too far to the left, as Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, the top progressive candidates, continue to command a major share of grassroots support. Centrists worry that progressives will not be able to mobilise the wider Democratic base or secure enough swing voters to defeat Republican President Donald Trump in the general election next year.
For these centrists, the election’s main goal is to defeat Trump. Progressives, on the other hand, believe that it is not enough to defeat Trump but that they must also reform the political system of which he is a symptom. In their view, if the system, which has been corroded by moneyed interests, is not fixed, it will lead to greater economic inequality and environmental collapse. Centre-left candidates such as Joe Biden and Michael Bloomberg have significant financial backing, but in the last three months Sanders and Warren raised more money than the other Democrat candidates, mostly through small donations made online. This suggests a level of grassroots support that their rivals cannot match, and an enthusiasm in the electorate for greater political change than is offered by those closer to the political centre.
The Democrats have now had three years to reflect on their previous choice of a centrist candidate, Hillary Clinton, who was defeated by Trump in 2016. Many reflected at the time that by playing it safe, they lost the presidency. Among these was Trump’s own pollster, Tony Fabrizio, who commented after that election that if Sanders had been the Democratic nominee, he would have defeated Trump.
The 78-year-old Sanders is widely seen as the standard-bearer of the progressive movement that has gathered pace within the Democratic Party since his campaign for nomination in 2016. Sanders and his fellow progressive, Elizabeth Warren, are the only two candidates to tie with the presumptive frontrunner, Joe Biden, in the polls.
While Warren has received significant media attention, early polls suggest Sanders would fare better in the general election against Trump, and that he could win. His ideas, such as Medicare for All, free public college education and a $15-per-hour minimum wage, have helped set the parameters of the primary debates and have been embraced by some of his rivals.
For voters seeking the strongest possible repudiation of Trump and his policies, Sanders’s focus on economic inequality and climate change offer direct countermeasure against the current president’s campaign of tax cuts and withdrawal from the Paris Agreement.
Sanders' aversion to corporate funding is also a part of his appeal. Over many years, suspicion has built up as successive Republican and Democratic administrations, lobbied extensively by corporations and wealthy individuals, embraced neoliberal economic policies that led in turn to increased economic inequality. This stoked the popularity of non-traditional candidates such as Trump. But Trump was himself a benefactor of neoliberal economics, and his administration has embraced corporate interests with alacrity. If the electorate's faith in the presidency has been shaken by Trump, Sanders - another political outsider, albeit from the other end of the spectrum - may benefit from widespread scepticism this would engender.
And while Trump has sought to use identity politics to mobilise the majority to the detriment of social minorities, Sanders has taken aim at a still smaller - but more well-defended - group: those with a net worth of over $32m, whom he has targeted with a significant wealth tax. There are an estimated 607 billionaires in the US, but the impact of their extreme wealth is widely felt.
Sanders is also one of the leading proponents of the Green New Deal, an ambitious policy to address both climate change and income inequality, in part by creating 20 million new jobs. He has received an A+ rating, the highest rating of any primary candidate, from Greenpeace, and his commitment to the Green New Deal has won him the endorsement of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, one of the most popular Democrats with younger voters.
There are obstacles, too. Sanders is 78, and recently suffered a heart attack. And in the US, identifiying as a democratic socialist could be dangerous at the ballot box. In his speech to the UN in September, Trump called socialism the “destroyer of societies”; this was a comment aimed at his base. Many Americans possess a residual Cold War mindset and conflate socialism with communism. Others identify it with authoritarian regimes, such as in Venezuela. While Sanders has stated that his version of socialism does not entail the government owning the means of production, the socialist label is shorter and more easily spread.
If Sanders is to overcome this he will need to educate American about the socialist tradition that defined some of Europe’s most effective and respected leaders such as Clement Attlee, Felipe González, François Mitterrand and Willy Brandt. He will need to show that far from destroying capitalism in their countries, these leaders created wealth and widespread prosperity. To position himself as the political heir to Franklin Roosevelt, whose own New Deal brought America out of the Great Depression, will be difficult, but it would make Sanders the candidate of growth, optimism and opportunity - in stark contrast to the negative, divisive rhetoric of the Trump campaign.
First, however, he has to win the primary, which will once more be a choice between grassroots popularity and the centrist tradtition.








Thursday, December 5, 2019

FOCUS: Mark Ruffalo Endorses Bernie Sanders







Reader Supported News
05 December 19
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


FOCUS: Mark Ruffalo Endorses Bernie Sanders
Actor Mark Ruffalo. (photo: Marvin Joseph/The Washington Post)
Judy Kurtz, The Hill
Kurtz writes: "Mark Ruffalo is endorsing Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in the 2020 presidential race, saying the Democratic White House hopeful is 'one of us.'"


Sanders's campaign released a video Wednesday featuring the actor, who plays the Hulk in "The Avengers."
In the clip, Ruffalo credited Sanders with bringing "key issues" such as climate change, health care and student loan debt to the forefront of the national conversation.
"People considered those things to be pie in the sky in 2016, right?" Ruffalo said into the camera.
"Now they are the norm because Bernie stood and walked into those issues that he knew were the right issues for the American working class."
"He is the original progressive," Ruffalo, 52, continued. "We need a leader who's actually one of us, and Bernie is one of us and he's always been one of us."
"[Sanders] will make an excellent and historic president in the very moment we are ready for it and need it most."
The endorsement from the "Dark Waters" star is far from unexpected given his vocal support of Sanders over the years, including in the 2016 White House race. At a red carpet premiere in Washington last month, Ruffalo told reporters that he believed the 78-year-old lawmaker will "beat [President] Trump's ass" in the 2020 election.
Last year, Ruffalo — a prominent Hollywood critic of the president — was one of several performers who participated in the "People's State of the Union," which he described as a populist alternative to Trump's address.
Ruffalo isn't the only high-profile entertainer who's thrown their support behind Sanders. Rapper Cardi B, singers Ariana Grande and Miley Cyrus, and Susan Sarandon have all praised Sanders's 2020 presidential bid. 




After much deliberation and with an open heart and mind, I have decided to put my full support behind Bernie Sanders' bid for the Democratic presidential nomination.
The truth is that everything that is most exciting about our Democratic candidates are things Bernie has advocated for during his entire career and in the 2016 election.
Health care for all as a human right...Bernie. Making fighting climate change an absolute priority...Bernie. Equal opportunity education for all and student debt relief for all...Bernie. Fighting corporate greed and corruption...Bernie. Fighting the fossil fuel industry and making sure we keep climate-killing fossil fuels in the ground...Bernie. Non-corporate, people-financed political campaigns...Bernie. Ending American imperialism in our foreign policy...Bernie. Fighting for trade deals that lift the middle class and workers throughout the world over corporate power...Bernie. Uniting people around fairness, justice, racial equality, gender and sexual equality...Bernie.
He is the original progressive from the VERY BEGINNING of his career. And Bernie's campaign is our best chance at beating Trump, and beyond that, bringing an end to this corrupt system we are all living in.
That is why I'd like to ask you to do something important today:
Can you join me in supporting Bernie today by adding your name as an endorser of his campaign? Bernie is counting on a movement built by people like you and me in order to win this election and bring about the changes our country needs.
Bernie has always been who he is today. He has always done the right thing for people and he has never let political winds dictate his positions. That is fresh and real and it adds credibility to what we are doing together on this campaign.
He has shown us throughout his career he has the courage of his convictions. Bernie didn’t come to these positions because the Democratic Party was moving this way. He articulated what so many of us have longed for, what so many Americans know we need, and brought the nation and the Democrats to get behind his vision.
That is the kind of leadership we need today, and that is why I need to ask:
Can you add your name to endorse Bernie's campaign today? Show you are part of the movement that is going to transform this country when we are in the White House.
I proudly and humbly give my support to Bernie Sanders. He will make an excellent and historic president in the very moment we are ready for it and need it most.
Thank you for being a part of this campaign.
In solidarity,
Mark Ruffalo











Sunday, November 17, 2019

The New York Times Editorial Board | Did President Trump Just Earn Himself Another Article of Impeachment?




Reader Supported News
17 November 19

We have a little rally going this morning. We need a few donations. Who has a moment to help?
Thanks in advance to all.
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News


If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 95611




Reader Supported News
16 November 19
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


The New York Times Editorial Board | Did President Trump Just Earn Himself Another Article of Impeachment?
The White House at night. (photo: Susan Walsh/AP)
The New York Times Editorial Board
Excerpt: "Republican defenders of Donald Trump have argued that he withheld congressionally mandated military aid to Ukraine and a promised White House meeting because he wanted assurances that Ukraine's new president, Volodymyr Zelensky, was serious about fighting corruption."

EXCERPT:
David Holmes, an official in the American Embassy in Kiev, testified to lawmakers privately that he had overheard a telephone conversation in which the ambassador to the European Union, Gordon Sondland, assured the American president that his Ukrainian counterpart “loves your ass” and will do “anything you ask him to,” including to open investigations into the family of Mr. Trump’s leading Democratic rival, Joe Biden.
Mr. Holmes said that he overheard the conversation while sitting at a restaurant in Kiev with Mr. Sondland. Mr. Trump was speaking so loudly, Mr. Holmes said, that the ambassador held the phone away from his ear and Mr. Holmes could hear Mr. Trump demanding to know if Mr. Zelensky had committed to the investigations. Thus, apparently, is diplomacy conducted at the highest levels of the Trump administration.

Representative Adam Schiff, the chairman of the Intelligence Committee, interrupted the questioning to let the ambassador know that the president was attacking her.
After reading Ms. Yovanovitch one of the belligerent tweets, Mr. Schiff asked: “What effect do you think that has on other witnesses’ willingness to come forward and expose wrongdoing?”
“Well, it’s very intimidating,” she said, visibly shaken.
Mr. Schiff assured her that “some of us here take witness intimidation very, very seriously.”
Translation: The president may just have earned himself an article of impeachment.
In a refreshing development, the ensuing criticism of Mr. Trump’s Twitter fit was bipartisan. Representative Liz Cheney, Republican of Wyoming, said the president’s tweeting “was wrong.”
“Extraordinarily poor judgment,” said Kenneth Starr, the former independent counsel at the center of President Clinton’s impeachment, on Fox News. “Obviously this was quite injurious.” Fox News’ Bret Baier called it “a turning point in this hearing.”
Even an effort by Republican lawmakers on Friday to clear the president wound up underscoring how indifferent he was to wrongdoing by officials in Ukraine.

Stephen Miller. (photo: Joshua Roberts/Reuters)
Stephen Miller. (photo: Joshua Roberts/Reuters)


Stephen Miller Is No Outlier. White Supremacy Rules the Republican Party
Cas Mudde, Guardian UK
Mudde writes: "This week, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) published a bombshell article revealing troubling emails that White House senior policy advisor Stephen Miller sent to editors at Breitbart News, the far-right media outlet previously led by Steve Bannon."

EXCERPT:
It also externalizes white supremacy, as if it lives in the margins. But it has been hiding in plain sight within the Republican Party for decades. Miller wrote the emails to Breitbart when he was still an aide to Senator Jeff Sessions, who has been a consistent voice of white supremacy in Congress since 1997. And the Alabama Senator was not alone in Congress either. Representative Steve King has been the most open and unapologetic voice for the cause since 2003. Others, like representatives Louie Gohmert, Paul Gosar, Tom Tancredo and Dana Rohrabacher, might not be as open in their support, but they all encourage white nationalism to varying degrees.
But white supremacy in the Republican party is not limited to just these individual congressmen and women. It runs much deeper than them. White supremacy was at the core of the “Southern Strategy”, dating back to the unsuccessful 1964 presidential campaign of Barry Goldwater, which was formative for the future conservative movement. Perfected by President Richard Nixon, with the help of speechwriter Pat Buchanan, dog whistles to white supremacy have been at the heart of virtually every Republican campaign since the 1970s.
Talking of Buchanan, more than 25 years ago he gave his now famous “culture war” speech at the 1992 Republican convention. While the term has become mainly linked to the religious right, Buchanan is at least as much a white supremacist as a Christian fundamentalist. In many ways, he is the intellectual father of the Trump administration, personifying Mike Pence and Donald Trump in one.
This is why calling for Stephen Miller’s resignation wouldn’t change much. Neither Miller nor Bannon “made” Trump the white-supremacist-in-chief. And Trump is not the only problem either, as Joe Biden seems to believe. He won the Republican primaries, and presidential elections, not despite white supremacy but because of it.

Rep. Max Rose. (photo: Caroline Brehman/CQ-Roll Call/Getty Images)
Rep. Max Rose. (photo: Caroline Brehman/CQ-Roll Call/Getty Images)

Two Democrats Are Introducing a Bill to Ban Corporate PACs
Ella Nilsen, Vox
Nilsen writes: "Two moderate House Democrats are introducing a bill aiming to root out corporate influence where it currently thrives: Washington, DC."

EXCERPT:
On Friday, Reps. Max Rose (NY) and Josh Harder (CA) will introduce the “Ban Corporate PACs Act,” which would ban for-profit corporations from being allowed to sponsor, operate, or fund PACs. Vox was given an exclusive first look at the legislation.
The bill’s co-authors see it as a necessary addition to the HR 1 — also known as the “For the People Act” — the vast anti-corruption bill that was House Democrats’ first priority after taking back the majority in 2018. HR 1 passed the House way back in early March, but it has gone nowhere as Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell vehemently opposes it.
“We always said HR 1 was just the beginning,” Rose told Vox in an interview. Rose called corporate PACs “legalized bribery” that “should not have a place in this town.”


Salvadorans commemorate the murder of six Jesuit priests and two women at UCA in San Salvador - one of the civil war's most notorious crimes. (photo: Oscar Rivera/EPA/Corbis)
Salvadorans commemorate the murder of six Jesuit priests and two women at UCA in San Salvador - one of the civil war's most notorious crimes. (photo: Oscar Rivera/EPA/Corbis)


30 Years Ago Today in El Salvador, US-Trained Soldiers Murdered 6 Priests in Cold Blood
Hilary Goodfriend, Jacobin
Goodfriend writes: "Today marks thirty years since the massacre of six Jesuits, their housekeeper, and her daughter by US-trained forces. But US brutality in Latin America isn't a thing of the past: top military officials involved in the coup against Bolivian president Evo Morales were trained by the United States, too."

EXCERPT:

n November 16, 1989, six Jesuit priests, their housekeeper, and her daughter were murdered in their residence on the campus of the Jesuit Central American University (UCA) in San Salvador, El Salvador. Thirty years later, the massacre remains emblematic of the indiscriminate savagery exercised by the servants of the Salvadoran ruling class, the impunity they enjoy, and the devastating legacies of US intervention in the region.
The Jesuit murders drew international outcry, but the victims were only eight of some seventy-five thousand killed and ten thousand more disappeared during the twelve-year civil war (1980–1992). Formally, the conflict pitted the US-backed military dictatorship against the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN) leftist guerillas. But the Salvadoran state tortured and slaughtered civilians with abandon. At the war’s close, a 1993 United Nations Truth Commission report attributed only 5 percent of the bloodshed to the insurgents. The regime and its paramilitaries bore responsibility for the vast majority of the conflict’s deaths, disappearances, and displacements.
The Salvadoran security forces didn’t carry out these horrors alone. They were armed, trained, funded, and advised by the United States. The attack at the UCA was carried out by members of the Atlacatl Battalion, an elite counterinsurgency force trained at the infamous School of the Americas (SOA) in Fort Benning, Georgia. Several members of the military high command who gave the orders and participated in the cover-up were also graduates of that illustrious institution. The best way we can honor the victims of the Jesuit massacre and US-backed atrocities worldwide today is to stop them from recurring by severing the global tentacles of US empire.

The new rule requires U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers to have a signed judicial warrant if they plan to enter a courthouse to make an arrest. (photo: Newsy)
The new rule requires U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers to have a signed judicial warrant if they plan to enter a courthouse to make an arrest. (photo: Newsy)

Oregon Supreme Court Bars Warrantless ICE Courthouse Arrests
Conrad Wilson, Oregon Public Broadcasting
Wilson writes: "Oregon Supreme Court Chief Justice Martha Walters enacted a new rule Thursday that will make it harder for immigration agents to make civil arrests in the state's courthouses."
READ MORE

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is pictured during a visit to the Pentagon, March 22, 2018. (photo: Cliff Owen/AP)
Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is pictured during a visit to the Pentagon, March 22, 2018. (photo: Cliff Owen/AP)

Saudi Spies Hacked My Phone and Tried to Stop My Activism. I Won't Stop Fighting.
Omar Abdulaziz, The Washington Post
Abdulaziz writes: "In the fight against the online campaigns targeting Saudi citizens, I had a powerful ally and friend in Jamal Khashoggi, who recognized the power of Twitter to shape public opinion in Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Arab world."
Jamal was murdered because he was willing to fight trolls and propaganda with truth and ideas. But we are still learning how far Saudi Arabia — and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman — is willing to go to monitor and silence critics online.
Last week, the Justice Department announced that it was charging two former Twitter employees with spying for Saudi Arabia by accessing the company’s information on dissidents on the platform. I was one of the targets.
It’s all been part of a coordinated campaign of harassment. Saudi Arabia, using spyware sold by the Israeli company NSO Group, hacked my phone to read my messages with Jamal, with whom I was working to identify and combat Saudi trolls on Twitter, which we called the “electronic bees.” We were working together to organize an army of volunteers to counter them.
The Saudi government deployed every tactic to get me to drop the project. They arrested my relatives and friends to pressure me. They imprisoned my brothers and asked them to convince me to stop working on our volunteer campaign. Jamal was shocked they had learned about it and asked me to never discuss it publicly.
To understand why they cared so much about protecting their Twitter trolls you have to understand the popularity and importance of Twitter for Saudis.
Since we didn’t have a lot of options for entertainment in Saudi Arabia, we coped with our environment by living a different reality on our smartphones. Twitter soon became crucial to exercise the first element of individual liberty: freedom of expression. The platform’s popularity exploded among Saudis virtually overnight. We lived democratically on Twitter. People posted freely.
Twitter even allowed people to engage with dissidents in exile, something that wouldn’t have been possible before. It also allowed the government to track public opinion. At first the government was responsive. Royal decrees were announced on Twitter. Rumors circulated but also got debunked. Officials faced pressure to be more transparent.
That all changed with the rise of MBS. Saudi Twitter gradually morphed into a propaganda platform, with the government deploying trolls and pressuring influencers to amplify its messages. More than 30 influencers told me that the Saudi government blackmailed them with material obtained by hacking their phones. They were given two options: Tweet propaganda or have your private content, including pictures, released on Twitter.
McKinsey & Company, the consulting firm, prepared a report on how public opinion is shaped on Twitter (according to a source the report was reviewed by MBS but the company denies it was prepared for him). They identified me among the top three most influential users on Twitter. I’m now in exile; another got arrested, and the third user vanished. His tweets were all deleted.
In September 2017, more than 100 Twitter influencers were arrested. The charges were never made public. In December of that year, Jamal tweeted: “Saudi government trolls have a devastating effect on the national public opinion."
In unison, Saudi trolls ridicule free folks and resistance, Jamal added. He worried the propaganda was dividing the country. He is right.
Fake accounts and hired writers spread hatred among Saudis with tribal and racist attacks.
But Twitter is still worth fighting for — it remains the only free platform for many Saudis. After Jamal’s death, my team spent months trying to counter the troll narratives with trending hashtags.
It’s sad to see that Twitter may be one of the factors behind Jamal’s brutal murder. It’s a heartbreaking development because we had so much hope on the platform.
In 2013, Jamal posted: “Someday Twitter will win a Nobel prize.” But now we see it’s slipping into darkness. Will Twitter take measures to protect our public square? Right now I’m worried, but I will continue to fight for free expression, at least online.


Sen. Bernie Sanders. (photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty)
Sen. Bernie Sanders. (photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty)

What Critics of Bernie Sanders' Climate Plan Are Missing
Zoya Teirstein, Grist
Teirstein writes: "Bernie Sander's $16 trillion climate plan, which he calls the Green New Deal, would transition the electricity and transportation sectors to renewable energy by 2030, allegedly create 240,000 jobs a year, and essentially nationalize the nation's power sector."
READ MORE