Search This Blog

Translate

Blog Archive

Middleboro Review 2

NEW CONTENT MOVED TO MIDDLEBORO REVIEW 2

Toyota

Since the Dilly, Dally, Delay & Stall Law Firms are adding their billable hours, the Toyota U.S.A. and Route 44 Toyota posts have been separated here:

Route 44 Toyota Sold Me A Lemon



Showing posts with label Jamie Dimon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jamie Dimon. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 13, 2019

FOCUS: Robert Reich | Why Billionaires Don't Really Like Capitalism




Reader Supported News
13 November 19

We are getting a great response from very small donors but the small donations are not moving the progress bar much.
Is there someone who can match the smaller donations with a $1,000.
Thank you sincerely in advance.
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News


If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts
CA 95611


Reader Supported News
13 November 19
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


FOCUS: Robert Reich | Why Billionaires Don't Really Like Capitalism
Robert Reich. (photo: Getty)
Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog
Reich writes: "Billionaires are wailing that Elizabeth Warren's and Bernie Sanders's wealth tax proposals are attacks on free market capitalism.


Warren “vilifies successful people,” says Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase. 
Rubbish. There are basically only five ways to accumulate a billion dollars, and none of them has to do with being successful in free market capitalism.    
The first way is to exploit a monopoly.
Jamie Dimon is worth $1.6 billion. That’s not because he succeeded in the free market. In 2008 the government bailed out JPMorgan and four other giant Wall Street banks because it considered them “too big to fail.” 
That bailout is a hidden insurance policy, still in effect, with an estimated value to the big banks of $83 billion a year. If JPMorgan weren’t so big and was therefore allowed to fail, Dimon would be worth far less than $1.6 billion. 
What about America’s much-vaulted entrepreneurs, such as Jeff Bezos, now worth $110 billion? You might say Bezos deserves this because he founded and built Amazon.
But Amazon is a monopolist with nearly 50 percent of all e-commerce retail sales in America, and e-commerce is one of the biggest sectors of retail sales. In addition, Amazon’s business is protected by a slew of patents granted by the U.S. government. 
If the government enforced anti-monopoly laws, and didn’t give Amazon such broad patents,Bezos would be worth far less than $110 billion. 
A second way to make a billion is to get insider information unavailable to other investors. 
Hedge-fund maven Steven A. Cohen, worth $12.8 billion, headed up a hedge fund firm in which, according to a criminal complaint filed by the Justice Department, insider trading was “substantial, pervasive, and on a scale without known precedent in the hedge fund industry.” Nine of Cohen’s present or former employees pleaded guilty or were convicted. Cohen got off with a fine, changed the name of his firm, and apparently is back at the game.  
Insider trading is endemic in C-suites, too. SEC researchers have found that corporate executives are twice as likely to sell their stock on the days following their own stock buyback announcements as they are in the days leading up to the  announcements. 
If government cracked down on insider-trading, hedge-fund mavens and top corporate executives wouldn’t be raking in so much money. 
A third way to make a billion is to buy off politicians. 
The Trump tax cut is estimated to save Charles and the late David Koch and their Koch Industries an estimated $1 to $1.4 billion a year, not even counting their tax savings on profits stored offshore and a shrunken estate tax. The Kochs and their affiliated groups spent some $20 million lobbying for the Trump tax cut, including political donations. Not a bad return on investment.
If we had tough anti-corruption laws preventing political payoffs, the Kochs and other high-rollers wouldn’t get the special tax breaks and other subsidies that have enlarged their fortunes.  
The fourth way to make a billion is to extort big investors.
Adam Neumann conned JP Morgan, SoftBank, and other investors to sink hundreds of millions into WeWork, an office-sharing startup. Neumann used some of the money to buy buildings he leased back to WeWork and to enjoy a lifestyle that included a $60 million private jet. WeWork never made a nickel of profit. 
A few months ago, after Neumann was forced to disclose his personal conflicts of interest, WeWork’s initial public offering fell apart and the company’s estimated value plummeted. To salvage what they could, investors paid him over $1 billion to exit the board and give up his voting rights. Most other WeWork employees were left holdingnear-worthless stock options. Thousands were set to be laid off. 
If we had tougher anti-fraud laws, Neumann and others like him wouldn’t be billionaires. 
The fifth way to be a billionaire is to get the money from rich parents or relatives.
About 60 percent of all the wealth in America today is inherited, according to estimates by economist Thomas Piketty and his colleagues. That’s because, under U.S. tax law – which is itself largely a product of lobbying by the wealthy – the capital gains of one generation are wiped out when those assets are transferred to the next, and the estate tax is so tiny that fewer than 0.2 percent of estates were subject to it last year.  
If unearned income were treated the same as earned income under the tax code, America’s non-working rich wouldn’t be billionaires. And if capital gains weren’t eliminated at death, many heirs wouldn’t be, either.
Capitalism doesn’t work well with monopolies, insider-trading, political payoffs, fraud, and large amounts of inherited wealth. Billionaires who don’t like Sanders’s and Warren’s wealth tax should at least support reforms that end these anti-capitalist advantages.








Sunday, November 10, 2019

RSN: William Boardman | US Policy: Global Climate Crisis Not Our Problem. Really?





Reader Supported News
09 November 19

If You are Going to Stay, You Have to Help
The budget is too thin to do this. We have many, many more readers than donors and it is breaking the process down.
We understand that we will lose some readers, although we haven’t lost many yet, if we do we do.
If you stay we need your help and we need it now.
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News
Sure, I'll make a donation!

Update My Monthly Donation

If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 95611




Reader Supported News
09 November 19
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


RSN: William Boardman | US Policy: Global Climate Crisis Not Our Problem. Really?
Pollution from a factory. (photo: Science Focus)
Williams Boardman, Reader Supported News
Boardman writes: "By withdrawing from the Paris climate agreement, the US is effectively saying the global climate crisis is not our problem. This is American exceptionalism run amok. The US acts as if it can opt-out of the only planet we have because, well, because we're special. This is not logical, this is not practical, this is not moral, and this is not possible."

This is delusional. This is a crime against humanity. And yet the House Democrats remain obsessed with the low-level intrigues of Ukraine, Trumps, Bidens, and other clowns while turning away from the growing global catastrophe. Yes, there’s some evidence of minor-league failed chicanery on several sides of the Ukraine mashup. But the case is a joke compared to the climate crisis, and our Democratic leadership chooses to focus on the picayune over the universally tragic.
It’s not as though American leadership hasn’t had time to prepare. Forty years has been enough time for most nations to take climate issues seriously and to start responding responsibly. New Zealand has become the first to vote to achieve zero carbon admissions by 2050 (not good enough, but the best there is). Internationally, the response has been uneven and overall inadequate, but only the US is in such deep institutional denial. Only the US is pulling out of the Paris accord, only the US thinks it knows better than every other nation in the world, only the US believes in its own magical exceptionalism. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, making the official US announcement on Twitter on November 4, invoked American exceptionalism in his dishonest assertions:
Today we begin the formal process of withdrawing from the Paris Agreement. The U.S. is proud of our record as a world leader in reducing all emissions, fostering resilience, growing our economy, and ensuring energy for our citizens. Ours is a realistic and pragmatic model.
At the same time that the US was boasting of its non-existent leadership on climate, the peer-reviewed science magazine BioScience published an article titled World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency that represented the first time scientists have used the word “emergency” in reference to climate change. The paper was signed by 11,258 scientists from 153 countries and began:
Scientists have a moral obligation to clearly warn humanity of any catastrophic threat and to “tell it like it is.” On the basis of this obligation and the graphical indicators presented below, we declare, with more than 11,000 scientist signatories from around the world, clearly and unequivocally that planet Earth is facing a climate emergency. [emphasis added]

Exactly 40 years ago, scientists from 50 nations met at the First World Climate Conference (in Geneva 1979) and agreed that alarming trends for climate change made it urgently necessary to act. Since then, similar alarms have been made through the 1992 Rio Summit, the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, and the 2015 Paris Agreement, as well as scores of other global assemblies and scientists’ explicit warnings of insufficient progress (Ripple et al. 2017). Yet greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are still rapidly rising, with increasingly damaging effects on the Earth's climate. An immense increase of scale in endeavors to conserve our biosphere is needed to avoid untold suffering due to the climate crisis (IPCC 2018).
At the same time, in another attack on the American environment, Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency was rolling back clean water rules. The EPA was relaxing controls on toxic coal ash pools, which contain mercury, arsenic, and other dangerous chemicals, allowing them to pollute waterways near coal-fired electric plants. According to Democracy NOW, Food & Water Watch has vowed to sue the Trump administration over the rollback of the rules, which it says would “lead directly to more water contamination, more birth defects, more childhood cancer and more pain and suffering for American families — all for the sake of a dirty industry’s last grasp at profits.”
According to President Trump, “We ended the war on beautiful clean coal.” There was no “war” and there is no “clean coal.” The real war has been waged by coal, oil, and other energy industries against the American people and the world. Exxon knew what the problem was 40 years ago and lied. Based on corporate behavior, capitalism is both homicidal and, more slowly, suicidal. Political behavior offers little reassurance. This is the second time the US has reneged on a climate treaty supposedly negotiated in good faith. The first time was when President Bush pulled the US out of the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. In between, establishment Democrats have managed only limp and limited responses to the climate crisis.
No establishment party presidential candidate for 2020 offers adequate leadership on climate, as assessed by Greenpeace in an elaborate, detailed scoring system. Only one candidate was rated A+ and that was Bernie Sanders. Three others were rated A- and they were, in order of score, Elizabeth Warren, Tom Steyer, and Cory Booker. The rest were all rated lower, with Bill Weld and Donald Trump at the bottom, each with an F. The two-party system hasn’t stepped up on climate issues and shows no likelihood of doing so in the near future – unless Democrats somehow nominate a candidate willing to cope with reality. Even then, we face an uphill struggle to save ourselves in opposition to entrenched narrow interests.
Sanders and Warren are the leading Democrats promoting serious structural change for the country. They are both getting substantial, frequently dishonest pushback from the powers of the status quo. Billionaire Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase ($30 million annual compensation) recently took a potshot at Elizabeth Warren. She “vilifies successful people,” Dimon complained falsely, offering no example. Maybe he feels personally hurt and vilified by Warren’s generic call for billionaires to pay a fair share for their country’s general wellbeing. Dimon has been attacking Warren for years, especially for her effort to create the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to reign in predatory banking. Dimon is a successful banker. Whether he’s a successful person is less clear in the fog of greed and privilege that shrouds his life, unmarked by any significant contribution to the common good. Warren was quick to respond:
It’s really simple: Jamie Dimon and his buddies are successful in part because of the opportunities, workforce, and public services that we all paid for. It’s only fair that he and his billionaire friends chip in to make sure everyone else has a chance to succeed….

The fact that they’ve reacted so strongly – so angrily! – to being asked to chip in more tells you all you need to know. The system is working great for the wealthy and well-connected, and Jamie Dimon doesn’t want that to change. I’m going to fight to make sure it works for everyone.
In addition to leaving the Paris accord, Trump’s policy of global ecocide now includes sending US troops into eastern Syria to secure Syrian oil. How is this not a nexus of impeachable offenses? What right does the US have to seize Syrian oil? What authority has Congress given Trump to use the military to seize Syrian oil that is best left in the ground for the sake of the planet?
Perhaps the first candidate to respond to Trump’s retreat on the climate accord, Elizabeth Warren wrote at length in The Guardian, outlining her plans to respond to the climate crisis.
President Trump surprised no one with his decision to withdraw from the agreement. It is yet another reckless choice in line with his steps to rollback our bedrock environmental laws, which have cleaned up our water and our air for decades. But that doesn’t minimize the gravity of his latest move. Trump is not only ceding American leadership at a critical juncture in the fight against climate change, he’s also giving away American jobs in the clean energy economy of the future – walking away from the greatest economic opportunity of our time.
The conventional wisdom of the day, especially among establishment Democrats and Republicans in general, is that taking measures to address the climate crisis adequately is just too expensive. We can’t afford it, they argue. And, yes, those measures would be expensive, especially when looked at in isolation. But the climate crisis is upon us. All signs are that it is accelerating and that even the chance of mitigation is limited and time is running out. What few seem to understand is that the cost of effectively addressing the climate crisis will be trivial when compared to the cost of NOT addressing the climate crisis.
It’s a long way to the next presidential election, with no assurance that an entrenched establishment will allow us to have a candidate worth voting for.


William Boardman has been writing for Reader Supported News since 2012. A collection of his essays, EXCEPTIONAL: American Exceptionalism Takes Its Toll, was published in September 2019 and is available from Yorkland Publishing of Toronto. He is a former Vermont assistant judge.
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.







Friday, April 12, 2019

Robert Reich | Wall Street Loves Socialism for Bankers - but Not for Ordinary People




Reader Supported News
12 April 19

Super important to get these few donations in. The dollar figures are by no means daunting. Your donation has made the difference in building RSN from day one. Invest in freedom, support RSN with a donation.
Thank you sincerely,
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News


If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 95611




Reader Supported News
12 April 19
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


Robert Reich | Wall Street Loves Socialism for Bankers - but Not for Ordinary People 
JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon. (photo: Getty)
Robert Reich, Guardian UK
Reich writes: "JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon decries socialism. Unless of course it's the banks that need a government bailout."
READ MORE

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin. (photo: Bloomberg News)
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin. (photo: Bloomberg News)
David Cay Johnston | Here's the Law That Requires Mnuchin to Turn Over Trump's Taxes, or Lose His Office and Go to Prison
David Cay Johnston, The Daily Beast
Johnston writes: "The law is clear, and it leaves no wiggle room. The consequences for breaking it include removal from public office and up to five years in prison."
READ MORE

Protesters outside the federal courthouse in San Antonio in 2017 rallying against a bill in Texas that bans so-called sanctuary cities. (photo: Eric Gay/AP)
Protesters outside the federal courthouse in San Antonio in 2017 rallying against a bill in Texas that bans so-called sanctuary cities. (photo: Eric Gay/AP)
Trump Admin Proposed Releasing Immigrant Detainees in Sanctuary Cities, Targeting Political Foes
Rachael Bade and Nick Miroff, The Washington Post
Excerpt: "White House officials have tried to pressure U.S. immigration authorities to release detainees onto the streets of 'sanctuary cities' to retaliate against President Trump's political adversaries, according to Department of Homeland Security officials and email messages reviewed by The Washington Post."
READ MORE

New York State senator Brad Hoylman (left) in a conversation with New York City mayor Bill de Blasio. (photo: Lars Niki/Getty)
New York State senator Brad Hoylman (left) in a conversation with New York City mayor Bill de Blasio. (photo: Lars Niki/Getty)
Democrats Say New Effort Is Needed for Trump's State Tax Returns After White House "Stonewalling"
Camilo Montoya-Galvez, CBS News
Montoya-Galvez writes: "Citing the White House's 'stonewalling' of a request by congressional Democrats to obtain President Trump's tax returns, Democratic lawmakers in New York's state legislature are spearheading a new effort to try to release the president's state tax information to Congress."
READ MORE

Representative Ilhan Omar. (photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty)
Representative Ilhan Omar. (photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty)





 


Beauchamp writes: "This week, leading Republicans and their allies in the media have been using an out-of-context quote from a recent speech by Rep. Ilham Omar (D-MN) to paint her as an anti-American radical indifferent to those killed during the 9/11 attacks. There was even a front-page New York Post juxtaposing her name with an image of the attack on the Twin Towers."

EXCERPT: 
Here’s Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX), one of the first Republicans to attack Omar over this, retweeting someone who references a false conspiracy theory that CAIR is a terrorist front group:
Here’s President Trump’s favorite morning show, Fox & Friends, outright labeling her disloyal:
Here’s Republican National Committee Chair Ronna McDaniel labeling her both “anti-Semitic” and “anti-American”:
And here’s Fox host Sean Hannity tweeting out the New York Post cover:



READ MORE

Children play amid the rubble of a house destroyed by a 2015 Saudi-led airstrike in Yemen's capital, Sanaa. (photo: Hani Mohammed/AP)
Children play amid the rubble of a house destroyed by a 2015 Saudi-led airstrike in Yemen's capital, Sanaa. (photo: Hani Mohammed/AP)

This Is How It Feels to Raise a Child Under Saudi Arabia's Bombs in Yemen
Sukaina Sharfuddin, Middle East Eye
Sharfuddin writes: "My boy was born as air strikes rained down, and three years later, the onslaught continues."
READ MORE

Flooding at the Pine Ridge Reservation. (photo: Henry Red Cloud/AP)
Flooding at the Pine Ridge Reservation. (photo: Henry Red Cloud/AP)

The Trump Administration Is Abandoning the Dakota Tribes as They Face a Second Catastrophic Storm
Nick Martin, Splinter
Martin writes: "The Oglala Sioux people that call the Pine Ridge Reservation home are still waiting for state and federal assistance to deal with the effects of Winter Storm Ulmer."
READ MORE