Search This Blog

Translate

Blog Archive

Middleboro Review 2

NEW CONTENT MOVED TO MIDDLEBORO REVIEW 2

Toyota

Since the Dilly, Dally, Delay & Stall Law Firms are adding their billable hours, the Toyota U.S.A. and Route 44 Toyota posts have been separated here:

Route 44 Toyota Sold Me A Lemon



Showing posts with label Robert Mueller. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Robert Mueller. Show all posts

Monday, October 14, 2019

FOCUS: Robert De Niro on Donald Trump: 'I Can't Wait to See Him in Jail'




Reader Supported News
13 October 19

People lose sight of why they are donating to Reader Supported News. It’s not about the articles. Our mission, what we do, what your donations are used for is an all-out effort to bring about Progressive social change through information.
That should be your inspiration, your rational for supporting our work. That’s what we do well. Fundraising has become a real challenge, but it allows that work to continue.
Patience and vision please.
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts
CA 95611





Reader Supported News
13 October 19
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News


FOCUS: Robert De Niro on Donald Trump: 'I Can't Wait to See Him in Jail'
Robert De Niro during filming for The Graham Norton Show on Friday. (photo: Isabel Infantes/PA)
Andrew Pulver, Guardian UK
Pulver writes: "Robert De Niro has renewed his criticism of Donald Trump, calling the US head of state a 'gangster president' and saying he 'can't wait' to see him jailed."









Saturday, July 27, 2019

REPUBLICANS SELLING THEIR SOULS, NORTH CAROLINA DISENFRANCHISEMENT



Way back when OJ Simpson was on trial for the murders of Ron and Nicole, and later on, when the Goldman family filed a civil suit — one of the most telling moments was when Simpson's lawyers attempted to slander Ron Goldman.
Goldman was a hero, trying to defend Nicole — if OJ was truly innocent, the lawyers would have held Ron up as a hero. But instead, by attacking his persona they implied that Ron deserved to be murdered. And likewise Nicole.
If there was truly one moment that convinced me of the despicable corruption of OJ Simpson, it was that moment — that appalling betrayal of common human decency.
Today ... we have seen a thematic replay of that same betrayal.
Mueller is a lifelong Republican. He was appointed by a Republican president. He is a former marine who served honorably. He is a lawyer with a well-deserved reputation for fairness. As a prosecutor, he has a well-deserved reputation for recognizing the limits of the law. Whether one agrees with his report or not, one still has to respect the credential of this public servant.
And yet, today — the Republican members of the House of Representatives attacked him on every front, as if he were the guilty one — and not the man he was charged to investigate. Instead of thanking him for his service, instead of respecting his credentials, they made him out to be their enemy.
In that, they were no better than OJ Simpson and his cutthroat lawyers attacking the reputation of the man that OJ murdered in a fit of rage. That a jury of idiots did not vote to convict is their failure. The evidence was there.
Likewise, the failure of the House Republicans to recognize that they have sold their souls to a steaming pile of corruption — history will not be kind to them. But I hope the voters will be even more unkind in another 466 days.



NORTH CAROLINA VOTER SUPPRESSION WRIT LARGE!
Just when the rest of the World is avoiding use of Social Security numbers....see the potential?
Jonathan Zasloff

In case you want to know how voter suppression works, take a look at this. It's from the North Carolina State Board of Elections website. This is the way to get a special "Voter Photo ID." Seems straightforward enough.
But there is a catch.
In order to give them the last four digits of your SS#, obviously you would have to show them your Social Security card.
But in order to get a Social Security card, per the Social Security Administration website, you have to show them -- a photo ID.
Joseph Heller would be proud.
There are workarounds. If you have a birth certificate and proof of residency, you can get a non-operator North Carolina ID card. IF, of course, you are willing and able to wait in line for several hours at the North Carolina DMV. (You can make an appointment there, but the very friendly and helpful operator explained to me that you can't get an appointment until mid-September). If you have a non-operator North Carolina ID card -- which is what low-income folks who don't drive have -- then you cannot renew your card online, like drivers can, so no matter what they had better be ready to wait for a loooong time. As always, it's very expensive to be poor.
Now, someone CAN navigate through all of this: if they have the time, and the resources, and can figure out how to get off work in order to spend several hours in line, and get to the appropriate office (two of the North Carolina DMV offices in Durham do not issue drivers' licenses). And of course they need to make sure that they do it in time. It took me several days and a bunch of work to figure all of this out, and I have a good bit of book learnin'. Imagine a smart and committed but low-income and not very sophisticated person trying to do it. If they make a mistake, they have to start all over again. (By the way, if you need to order your birth certificate and get an ID card, it will probably cost around $60, which poor people usually have lying around the house).
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is voter suppression.









Friday, July 26, 2019

DAN RATHER ON ROBERT MUELLER




There is an old saying made famous by General Douglas MacArthur in his 1951 goodbye speech to Congress, "Old soldiers never die, they simply fade away..."
I couldn't help but think of that, and be moved by its sentiments, as I watched what was perhaps the final public act of Robert Mueller, himself a decorated Marine who served heroically in Vietnam.
If anyone deserved a grand goodbye and thanks for service to a nation it was Mueller, but that would never have been his style. He would undoubtedly have preferred to "fade away," a graceful exit from the stage of action. Instead, what we witnessed was a dedicated public servant thrashed against the shoals of our political sea of discord.
Mueller's career deserves nothing but respect, and certainly not the snitty judgments of shallow politicians and puffed-up pundits. From his youth, he has been guided by a strong moral compass that pointed to a long and distinguished career of service to country.
Much also has been made of the "optics" of a man clearly halting and more aged from his earlier forceful presence. But that should not distract from the report he and his associates produced. The service he performed, in this chapter of life, and in the past, should elicit our compassion as well as our gratitude.
We live in an age where the term patriot is tossed around like a marketing campaign and is often used as a cudgel of political expediency. By all of my measures, however, Mueller has earned the term, not by pounding his chest or attacking others but by the dignified nature of a life dedicated at personal expense in service to country.
When the truth of this age is written, when it is separated from the cacophony of the moment, I suspect Robert Mueller will tower above those who now seek to taunt him into oblivion. His will be a name that will be remembered, and honored.













Thursday, July 25, 2019

The six most important quotes from Mueller’s six hours of testimony






The six most important 
quotes from Mueller’s six 
hours of testimony


BY JAMES HOHMANN




Mueller: ‘We have underplayed’ Russia's effect on our elections






















THE BIG IDEA: Bob Mueller chose his words carefully.  The former special counsel responded monosyllabically to hundreds of questions on Wednesday. He clearly did not want to be on Capitol Hill, declined repeated requests to read aloud passages from his 448-page report and took special care to never utter the I-word: impeachment. This makes the handful of moments when Mueller volunteered to elaborate, or emphasized something emphatically, worthy of special attention.

The overwhelming majority of Americans did not devote six hours of a summer workday to watching the 74-year-old answer five-minute rounds of questions from dozens of grandstanding lawmakers. Much of the press coverage this morning focuses less on substance than optics. That’s not totally unfair: Democrats subpoenaed Mueller to appear because they wanted made-for-TV moments, and they acknowledge they didn’t get what they hoped for.
Instead of reading the theater criticism, however, citizens who missed the cable circus might be better served by reading the transcripts. In his own understated, patrician and old-school way, Mueller undercut so much White House spin and drew attention to how many false statements President Trump has made to the American people. Here are the six most significant quotes from the former special counsel’s six hours in the hot seat – and why they matter:
1) On Russian interference in domestic politics: “They’re doing it as we sit here, and they expect to do it in the next campaign.”
The former FBI director, who earned a Purple Heart as a Marine in Vietnam and helped guide law enforcement during the traumatic aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, came out of retirement to investigate the Kremlin’s efforts to sway the 2016 presidential election.
“We have underplayed to a certain extent that aspect of our investigation,” Mueller told the House Intelligence Committee in the afternoon, explaining that Russia’s effort to undermine elections could do “long-term damage to the United States that we need to move quickly to address.”
Mueller said he wrote the first volume of his report to serve as “our living message to those who come after us” so that they “don’t let this problem continue to linger as it has over so many years.” And he warned that “many more countries” are developing capabilities to do the same, emboldened by the success of Moscow, as he reiterated the need for “swift” action.
Asked about Trump campaign officials interacting with Russians who offered help to their election efforts, and the failure to report such overtures to the FBI, Mueller said he hopes future campaigns don’t think it’s acceptable to accept assistance from foreign governments. “I hope this is not the new normal,” he said, “but I fear it is.”

From someone who spent 28 years in the CIA’s clandestine service, including in Moscow and running the agency’s Russia operations:

Mueller: ‘We have underplayed’ Russia's effect on our elections
'Problematic is an understatement': Mueller comments on Trump's past WikiLeaks praise
2) On Trump’s past praise for WikiLeaks: “Problematic is an understatement in terms of what it displays of giving some hope or some boost to what is and should be illegal behavior.”
Mueller faulted Trump for previously praising the anti-secrecy group, whose leader Julian Assange now faces federal charges, and which allegedly served as a conduit for the Russians to disseminate hacked emails of Hillary Clinton campaign officials.
Mueller said he agrees with Mike Pompeo’s characterization of WikiLeaks as a “hostile intelligence service.” Trump said “I love WikiLeaks” at a rally in the fall of 2016. His son Don Jr. tweeted a link to stolen documents that Mueller’s report said was provided to him by WikiLeaks in a Twitter direct message.
Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) asked Mueller whether knowingly accepting foreign assistance is an unethical thing to do. “And a crime, given certain circumstances,” Mueller replied, nodding. “It’s also unpatriotic,” said Schiff. “True,” replied Mueller.

Mueller reiterates that report does not exonerate President Trump on obstruction of justice


3) Rebutting Trump’s claims of total exoneration: “The president was not exculpated for the acts that he allegedly committed.”
Mueller clarified his position on whether he would have indicted the president if not for the opinion from the Office of Legal Counsel that says a sitting president shouldn’t face criminal charges. “We did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime,” he said.
“We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term,” Mueller said in his opening statement. “Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.”
Asked whether the president, under Justice Department policy, could be prosecuted for obstruction of justice after he leaves office, Mueller kept his answer succinct: “True.”

Mueller says his investigation 'is not a witch hunt’




4) Finally defending the integrity of his investigation: “It is not a witch hunt.”
For two years, Mueller kept quiet as Trump and his allies impugned him and his team. Even during the news conference in May to announce his resignation as special counsel, Mueller did not offer a full-throated defense of his methods or personnel. On Wednesday, he replied to GOP criticism that some of the career prosecutors on his team previously gave money to Democrats.
“I’ve been in this business for almost 25 years. In those 25 years, I’ve not had occasion once to ask about somebody’s political affiliation,” Mueller said. “It is not done. What I care about is the capability of the individual to do the job and do the job seriously and quickly and with integrity.”
Justice Department policy prohibits asking about political views as part of a job interview. Mueller also explained that he moved former FBI official Peter Strzok off his team as soon as he found out about anti-Trump text messages in 2016.
Rep. Guy Reschenthaler (R-Pa.) accused Mueller of including only “the very worst” information about Trump in his report. “Not true,” he replied, adding that the team “strove to put in exculpatory evidence” about Trump’s conduct.

Mueller says he didn’t subpoena Trump in order to expedite his investigation
 


5) On why he didn’t subpoena the president: “We decided that we did not want to exercise the subpoena powers because of the necessity of expediting the end of the investigation.”
The former special counsel conceded that Trump’s written answers to his questions about Russian interference — the president refused to answer any questions about the 10 episodes of potential obstruction of justice that his office explored – were “certainly not as useful as the interview would be.”
Despite Trump’s claims that he fully cooperated, Mueller noted that the president’s team stonewalled in negotiations for over a year about a sit-down interview and said he assumed Trump “would fight the subpoena.” Mueller explained that he needed to decide “how much time you are willing to spend in the courts litigating an interview with the president.”
Despite claims that Mueller wanted to drag out his investigation, he made clear that he hoped to get it wrapped up as soon as possible. “The reason we didn’t do the interview was because of the length of time that it would take to resolve the issues attendant to that,” he said.

Trump says Mueller did ‘horrible job’



6) There was a coverup: “A number of people we interviewed in our investigation, it turns out, did lie.”
Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort, Michael Cohen, Rick Gates and George Papadopoulos have each acknowledged that they lied to the FBI. Rep. Val Demings (D-Fla.) asked Mueller whether it was “fair to say” that Trump’s written answers were “not only inadequate and incomplete, because he didn’t answer many of your questions, but where he did, his answers showed that he wasn’t always being truthful.”
“I would say, generally,” Mueller replied.
Mueller acknowledged that he caught many former members of Trump’s team not telling the truth, and this made it harder to investigate what really happened. “That would be accurate,” he said.
“And then,” Schiff said, “they lied to cover it up?”
“Generally, that’s true,” said Mueller.
Trump tweeted as soon as the second hearing ended: “TRUTH IS A FORCE OF NATURE!”
Indeed.






Wednesday, July 24, 2019

DAN RATHER re: Mueller testimony



REPUBLICANS genuflecting to tRump! Disappointing! 

We will have a battle of headlines, hot takes and hot air. We will have polls and politics. We will have the schisms plaguing American democracy plunge deeper. I fear little said today will, at least in the short term, provide any balm to our national struggles.
But this was historic. It confirmed what we already should have known. America was attacked by a hostile foreign power. That attack was welcomed and benefited a candidate for president. And that president lied about that attack and minimized it. His enablers and confederates have played along. Many of his aides have pled guilty to lying about their foreign contacts. This is un-American at its core.
That should be enough for bipartisan outrage. Whether we move towards impeachment will be the calculation of House leadership. But we saw in the questioning this afternoon a lot of tap dancing from Republicans eager to not infuriate their president but also not wishing to seem to countenance this type of foreign attack.
In all the smoke, in all the outrage, in all the posturing, we cannot forget the core truth. In between the lines of Mueller’s testimony we see his determination that the risk to our democratic ideals and function is deep and remains very present today. He has performed his service. How he performed that will be for others to judge. But the action now lies with Congress. How they respond, how we respond, will determine the verdict of history.



The morning session is over, and here are my thoughts:
The Mueller Report is one of the most damning investigations of a sitting administration in recent American history. It was always about the report. Everything was already in the report. And everyone in Congress already knew that. The real action should be by the House of Representatives taking up the baton of accountability, investigation, and justice not asking Robert Mueller to hand them the baton yet again.
It is clear that the President of the United States obstructed justice, but the Special Council felt he could not indict a sitting president under existing legal principle. It is also clear that there were many concerning and meaningful associations between the Trump campaign and the Russians, who were conducting a high-level and sophisticated campaign to undermine American democracy. We heard that today. We knew that before today.
The report does not exonerate the president. Of course it doesn’t. And Robert Mueller made that clear in a headline answer early in his testimony today. Could the president be charged with a crime after he left office? Once again, the answer from Mueller was yes. Did lies from the Trump administration officials impede the investigation? Another yes from Mueller.
But for all who hoped for a grand theatrical moment that crystallized and unified a nation against the outrages of this president, I don’t think any such moment occurred. And probably none should have been expected. We are a deeply divided nation where millions support and normalize the actions of a reckless president.
Mueller was obviously a reluctant witness who refused to paint a colorful sound bite narrative for the Democrats. Time and again he said “I would refer you to the report.” But any careful parsing of his answers would find many
Mueller was also mostly muted and restrained in defending his team and his own actions against the Republican members who waded into the numerous conspiracy theories and distractions that the president’s defenders have long peddled to muddy the investigation. Once again, Mueller understood it was all in the report.
I don’t know what the long-term effect will be of Mueller’s day on Capitol Hill. This moment of history is still being written. To think that Robert Mueller should be the main actor in the drama was always misplaced casting. This was not and should not have been about him. This is about the rule of law. This is about the separation of powers. This is about a reckless president and the confederates who enable him.
Was this an opening act for a rigorous launch of oversight by Congress, which is clearly what Mueller and his team felt was their constitutional duty? Or will it be the capstone on a political calculation by Democratic leadership that impeachment proceedings are unwise for their future electoral prospects?
If a Democrat wins the presidency in 2020, I predict there will be an explosion of chin stroking, sternly-worded op-eds, and endless Fox News segments about how we suddenly need to cut spending and take deficits seriously.