Search This Blog

Translate

Blog Archive

Middleboro Review 2

NEW CONTENT MOVED TO MIDDLEBORO REVIEW 2

Toyota

Since the Dilly, Dally, Delay & Stall Law Firms are adding their billable hours, the Toyota U.S.A. and Route 44 Toyota posts have been separated here:

Route 44 Toyota Sold Me A Lemon



Thursday, July 23, 2015

MASSterList: High stakes for Olympics debate | Millionaire tax a new litmus test | New Bedford casino shock



 



Thursday, July 23, 2015



Subscribe now for free!




By George Donnelly (@geodonnelly) with Keith Regan
Tonight: The big Olympics debate
Boston 2024 chairman Steve Pagliuca and U.S. Olympic Committee board member Daniel Doctoroff debate the co-chair of No Boston Olympics Chris Dempsey and Smith College economist Andrew Zimbalist on the merits of hosting the 2024 summer Olympics in Boston. The one-hour debate is co-sponsored by WFXT FOX25 and The Boston Globe, and moderated by FOX25 anchor Maria Stephanos and Globe reporter Sacha Pfeiffer. It's live on WFXT-TV Ch. 25, streaming on bostonglobe.com,  myfoxboston.com and the FOX25 app, 8 pm.

Debate preview: Olympic effort has more to gain -- and lose
Careful Olympic bid watcher and president of MassINC polling Steve Koczela serves up an insightful pre-debate analysis on the CommonWealth site. The stakes are high for Boston 2024, Koczela notes, because the group has to change minds, not just convince the undecided. http://bit.ly/1MpDhqR

The Herald outlines a host of Olympic issues
The Boston's Herald has timed a package of stories just before the big debate, including a page 1 splash on the thorny issue of traffic. "The proposed 2024 Summer Games could bring gridlock and bottlenecks to the Bay State's already jammed highways, as motorists are excluded from miles of special VIP lanes and congestion worsens from an increase of freight trucks on the road," the Herald reports. Boston 2024's Rich Davey responded that traffic traditionally has declined during Olympic events.http://bit.ly/1gPUbBX

Is the Massachusetts flat tax sacrosanct? A new political litmus test has arrived
Millionaires should pay a higher percentage of their income in state taxes, so says Raise Up Massachusetts, which will put the matter on the ballot in 2018. The question is whether this effort to create a graduated income tax will gain traction or suffer a miserable defeat, as earlier efforts to de-flatten the Massachusetts income tax have.
Raise Up has officially announced its intentions, saying it wants to tax millionaires a 9 percent income tax for every dollar they earn over $1 million. Thus, if you're unfortunate enough to only earn $990,000, you'll pay the same rate, right now at 5.15 percent, as other plebeians. But if you're among the 14,000 or so Massachusetts households with an income over $1 million, you would pay a premium for earning, say, $2 million, of roughly $40,000. The Globe story by David Scharfenberg says it would raise over $1 billion a year.
This will prove to be a fascinating litmus test for Republicans and Democrats alike. Will Bob DeLeo object to new taxes on millionaires? What about Charlie Baker? Does he really want to be on the side of the rich in this debate? It doesn't sound like a fun place to be.
Readers of MASSterList learned about the Raise Up efforts months ago, when I wrote this story about their strategizing in taking up the thorny issue of changing the flat tax, which is embedded in the state constitution. Unlike other efforts to create a graduated income tax, this one has real legs because it asks only the very wealthiest to pay more.

Rosenberg, the fundraising underachiever
Senate President Stanley Rosenberg raised a measly $264,000 in the first six months of 2015. Measly here is a relative term: Bob DeLeo raised $414,000 in the same time period, and Charlie Baker $940,000. But Rosenberg's donor list wasn't exactly paltry. Legislative agents aplenty. A lot of union money. The closest person to a celebrity we spotted was Jim Koch, the Boston Beer magnate. A surprise was the number of people with titles of "producer" -- for apparently the film industry felt a need to make its presence known. But the biggest surprise was in the expenditure column: Rosenberg paid over $30,000 to fundraising consultants in the first six months of the year. Expect more checks to come, and check out the range of checks here:

Candidates take aim at Yancey
City councillor Charles Yancey has been in the job since 1984 and is waging his 17th reelection campaign, facts that aren't deterring three candidates from running against him. With the preliminary election just around the corner, the Dorchester Reporter's Lauren Dezenski delves into the race, including the buzz around challenger Andrea Campbell, a 33-year-old former deputy counsel in Deval Patrick's office. http://bit.ly/1KmkrO5

App happy
Boston Globe columnist Alex Beam is riffing again, this time marveling at the proliferating number of apps that have people doing everything for us, including one called "Eaze" -- dubbed the Uber for pot.http://bit.ly/1TTdkRK


Boston 2024 caves, to release full bid 
Facing a threatened subpoena from the Boston City Council and harsh words from Mayor Marty Walsh, Boston 2024 said it would release its initial bid proposal to the USOC in its entirety, the Globe reports. Boston 2024 Chairman Steve Pagliuca said the full bid document will be released "in order to continue to maintain this high standard of transparency." That came shortly after Walsh, in a statement of his own from Rome, said the battle over the documents had become "an unnecessary distraction in what should be a constructive civil discourse about the future of the city of Boston." That, in turn, came after City Council President Bill Linehan blocked a bid by Councilor Tito Jackson to seek subpoena power to compel release of the full original bid documents, parts of which have been redacted in earlier releases. Linehan, citing council rules, sent the subpoena proposal to committee where it would likely have to wait a month before being considered again. Boston 2024 said the documents would be available within a week and emphasized that the original bid has since been supplanted by an updated  and more detailed version. http://bit.ly/1DxsH9d 

Will a statewide Olympics referendum fly?
Meanwhile, the Globe also reports that holding a statewide referendum on whether to host the Games isn't such a simple proposition. Seems only the legislature can propose non-binding, temperature-taking referenda; grassroots ballot questions must propose or repeal actual laws, and Boston 2024 hasn't taken any steps in that direction. Opponents have, however, with Evan Falchuck leading a drive to put a question before voters that would prohibit the state from spending on the Olympics directly. http://bit.ly/1g7UY17 

New Bedford in shock after casino pullout 
In a move that has shaken the port city of New Bedford and could reverberate cross the state's emerging casino sector, a developer pulled the plug on a proposed $650 million waterfront casino in the Whaling City, citing difficulties in attracting financing. According to the Standard-Times, KG Urban LLC informed the Massachusetts Gaming Commission of the decision in a letter, citing the "uncertainty of obtaining viable financing for the project and the time constraints of the license application process." Mayor Jon Mitchell called the move -- which comes after the city's bid was granted extensions of time by the MGC -- a "very big and unexpected setback" for the economically challenged city, which was expecting $12 million annually in payments from the casino. Residents are equally disheartened -- the local referendum on the proposal passed with 73 percent of the vote. The withdrawal leaves a Brockton proposal as the only one seeking the Southeastern Mass. resort casino license, something the MGC has said it wanted to avoid and something likely to come up when the Commission meets Thursday. http://bit.ly/1MlevHo 

Lawmakers eye buying waterfront houses 
A bill that would authorize the state to buy up storm-battered waterfront properties is gaining support on Beacon Hill, the Eagle-Tribune's Christian Wade reports. A climate change bill now carries a provision -- proposed by Sen. Marc Pacheco -- to allow the state to tap into a $20 million fund to buy out willing property owners. The state could then use those properties to help protect other property from coastal erosion. Lawmakers say they know some homeowners are willing to be bought out, rather than continuing to fight a costly and losing battle with waterfront erosion.  "Every time these properties in coastal high-hazard zones get damaged and fixed up, that comes at a cost to everybody else who pays flood insurance," Pacheco told the paper. "We know that the intensity of the storms are getting worse, and sea levels are rising, and so we need to take steps to protect the coastline." http://bit.ly/1fodIbH
How to reach me and MASSterList
Nothing makes me happier than comments, tips, suggestions. Also, opinion articles also will be considered. Please don't hesitate to weigh in on what we're missing and where we should look. Reach me atgdonnelly@massterlist.com or on Twitter @geodonnelly.



TODAY'S TOP STORIES
State headlines 
Boston 2024  
Casino Fallout  
Local headlines  



No comments: