Search This Blog

Translate

Blog Archive

Middleboro Review 2

NEW CONTENT MOVED TO MIDDLEBORO REVIEW 2

Toyota

Since the Dilly, Dally, Delay & Stall Law Firms are adding their billable hours, the Toyota U.S.A. and Route 44 Toyota posts have been separated here:

Route 44 Toyota Sold Me A Lemon



Saturday, August 20, 2016

Here Are the Massachusetts Ballot Questions for November 2016






Here Are the Massachusetts Ballot Questions for November 2016

Legal marijuana, a second slots parlor, charter schools and chickens. Here are the questions and who's backing them.




November's not so far away, as any number of presidential campaign ads will remind you daily from here on out. However, there are a few boxes on the Massachusetts ballot that could have a much more personal impact on you and yours come Nov. 8.
Patch has a quick overview of the four big ballot initiatives coming up and a brief overview of the people fighting for and against them:

Ballot Question 1: More Slots Licenses

The Question
"Expanding slot machine gaming. A 'yes' vote would allow a second slots parlor to exist in Massachusetts. The 2011 gambling law currently allows for up to three resort casinos and one slots parlor. The slots parlor license is owned by Penn National Gaming, which operates Plainridge Park Casino in Plainville."
The Players
The man behind the ballot push, according to The Boston Globe, is a "secretive" developer who's been buying up property near Suffolk Downs, with hopes to build a luxury hotel and gambling facility there. Opposed is Revere Mayor Dan Rizzo, whose city would be directly impacted. Staying tellingly neutral are other big gaming figures in the state who would face increased competition should the ballot initiative succeed, the Globe reports.

Ballot Question 2: More Charter Schools

The Question
The Massachusetts Authorization of Additional Charter Schools and Charter School Expansion Initiative, also known as Question 2, is on the Nov. 8, 2016, ballot in Massachusetts as an indirect initiated state statute.
A "yes" vote supports this proposal to authorize up to 12 new charter schools or enrollment expansions in existing charter schools by the state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education per year.
A "no" vote opposes this proposal to authorize up to 12 new charter schools or enrollment expansions in existing charter schools.
The Players
The state Democratic Party recently moved to oppose lifting the charter cap, aligning with many of its biggest supporters, including several state teachers' unions, most prominently the Massachusetts Teachers' Association. However, it's not a cut-and-dry, partisan issue. Gov. Charlie Baker, a Republican, supports lifting the cap and allowing more charter schools in Massachusetts, but so do several Democratic state lawmakersGreat Schools Massachusetts is mounting a million-dollar campaign for a "yes" on the ballot.

Ballot Question 3: More Free-Range Chickens

The Question

The Massachusetts Minimum Size Requirements for Question 3, also known as Question 3, is on the Nov. 8, 2016, ballot in Massachusetts as an indirect initiated state statute. It will be Question 3 on the ballot.

A "yes" vote is a vote in favor of prohibiting the sale of eggs, veal or pork of a farm animal "confined in a cruel manner."
A "no" vote is a vote against prohibiting the sale of eggs, veal or pork of a farm animal "confined in a cruel manner."
Question 3 would define "confined in a cruel manner" as "confined so as to prevent a covered animal from lying down, standing up, fully extending the animal’s limbs, or turning around freely."[1]
Massachusetts' Attorney General would be responsible for enforcing the law. A maximum fine of $1,000 could be levied for each violation.
The Players
Animal welfare advocacy group Citizens for Farm Animal Protection is the coalition supporting the Massachusetts ballot initiative. The egg industry isn't such a fan, saying the requirements fly in the face of logic, not to mention the laws of supply and demand. Find the full story on both sides from The Atlantic here.

Ballot Question 4: More Marijuana

The Question
The Massachusetts Marijuana Legalization Initiative.
A "yes" vote supports this proposal to allow the use, cultivation, possession and distribution of recreational marijuana for individuals at least 21 years old.
A "no" vote opposes this proposal to allow the use, cultivation, possession and distribution of recreational marijuana for individuals at least 21 years old.
The Players
Pushing for this initiative is a group called The Massachusetts Campaign to Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol. Aligned against it is a bipartisan group of powerful politicians including the state's governor, city of Boston's mayor and more members of the Campaign for a Safe and Healthy Massachusetts.



No comments: