Search This Blog

Translate

Blog Archive

Middleboro Review 2

NEW CONTENT MOVED TO MIDDLEBORO REVIEW 2

Toyota

Since the Dilly, Dally, Delay & Stall Law Firms are adding their billable hours, the Toyota U.S.A. and Route 44 Toyota posts have been separated here:

Route 44 Toyota Sold Me A Lemon



Showing posts with label Huffington Post. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Huffington Post. Show all posts

Saturday, March 25, 2017

Secret Service Can’t Afford The Trump Family’s Lifestyle




Secret Service Can’t Afford The Trump Family’s Lifestyle

The agency recently asked for $60 million more, but was told “no.”



President Donald Trump’s frequent travel, large family and unusual living situation are apparently weighing heavily on the Secret Service’s budget.
The agency recently requested an additional $60 million in spending for fiscal year 2018, according to a Washington Post report on Tuesday. Nearly $27 million of that was to be earmarked for security at the president’s private residence at Trump Tower in New York, where first lady Melania Trump lives with their 11-year-old son. The Secret Service also said it needed another $33 million to cover travel costs incurred by “the president, vice president and other visiting heads of state.”
The Office of Management and Budget rejected the request, a source told the Post, which could potentially force the Secret Service to scale back on other operations, like investigations into cyber hacking, counterfeit currency, financial crimes or missing and exploited minors.
The Post report comes amid questions about the president’s regular weekend jaunts to his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. Trump has made at least five trips to the “Southern White House” since his inauguration, each time costing taxpayers an estimated $3 million or more.
Providing Secret Service details for the first lady and the rest of Trump’s family, including his four adult sons and daughters, has also led to mounting costs. Although this level of protection is standard for the first family, the specific needs of Trump’s older children have attracted scrutiny.

THIS IS PERSONAL BUSINESS.
SHOULDN'T IT BE REIMBURSED TO THE TAXPAYERS? 
In February, for example, Eric Trump flew to Uruguay to promote the Trump Organization. The trip ended up costing taxpayers nearly $90,000 in hotel bills for the Secret Service agents who accompanied him, leading to renewed criticism of how the president’s business interests intertwine with government functions.
The idea of taxpayers footing higher bills to protect the wealthy Trumps may not sit well with critics of the harsh federal budget the president released last week. Trump’s plan proposes eliminating a number of antipoverty programs.
At a press conference this week, White House press secretary Sean Spicer said there was no hypocrisy here.
“Presidents always travel,” said Spicer. “The president, wherever he goes, he carries the apparatus of the White House with us. That is just something that happens.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/secret-service-funding-trump-family_us_58d2b5ede4b02d33b747ca5f?section=politics





Tuesday, August 30, 2016

HuffPo Deletes Articles Questioning Hillary’s Health, Terminates Writer




I wondered how long that would last! Since the daughter of the Wall $treet Whore sits on the board at HuffPo! They are just another arm of the KLINTOONIAN KABAL! #BerningOutrage
The Huffington Post terminated a contributor late Sunday evening after deleting…
WEARECHANGE.ORG|BY CASSANDRA FAIRBANKS


HuffPo Deletes Articles Questioning Hillary’s Health, Terminates Writer

Sunday, October 25, 2015

Iran in Syria Talks? Let's Not Care About What Saudi Won't Allow


It's time to STOP THE KILLING!





Everybody who's anybody agrees that if we want to end the Syria war instead of escalating it like John McCain wants to do, we need to talk to Iran. President Obama, Secretary of State Kerry, the Secretary General of the United Nations, analysts from Brookings and the Council on Foreign Relations. 

Everybody, that is, except the King of Saudi Arabia, the guy who won't let women drive. He insists on trying to keep Iran out of the talks, even though keeping Iran out means continuing the war indefinitely. 

It's time to "just say no" to Saudi Arabia. Saving lives by ending the war is more important than the Saudi King's chess game in Syria. 

I have a piece up at Huffington Post, explaining why everyone who's serious about ending the war wants to include Iran in the talks. 

Can you help spread the word by reading and sharing my piece on social media?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/iran-in-syria-talks-lets_b_8374368.html

Thanks for all you do to help defend diplomacy and end wars,

Robert Naiman
Just Foreign Policy


Policy Director, Just Foreign Policy


Iran in Syria Talks? Let's Not Care About What Saudi Won't Allow




Secretary of State Kerry said Friday he expects new talks on Syria to begin as soon as next week, and did not rule out participation by Iran, Reuters reports.
Asked if a meeting next week could include Iran, Kerry said he would not speculate on who might attend. But he added: "We want to be inclusive and err on the side of inclusivity rather than exclusivity."
Iran has not been invited to previous international peace conferences on Syria, all of which ended in failure, while the war, which has so far killed more than 250,000 people and driven millions from their homes, has raged on.
There is a strong correlation between the fact that Iran has been excluded and the fact that previous efforts have failed. If you want to end a war through negotiations, the key parties involved in the war have to be at the table - isn't that obvious? As Jeremy Shapiro of Brookings told NPR:
A. SHAPIRO (Host): One important party is not at the negotiating table in Vienna, and that is Iran. Can any kind of a solution be reached without Iranian involvement?
J. SHAPIRO: I don't think so. I think that the Iranians are too important on the ground in Syria. They have too much influence with the Assad regime and the various militias that are supporting it, and they have too much capacity to spoil any agreement that has been made without them. I think that whether we like it or not, if we're going to have a political settlement to the Syrian civil war, the Iranians need to be part of it.
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said during the UN General Assembly that five countries are key to a political solution: the United States, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Iran. As the BBC reported at the time:
UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said five countries - Russia, the US, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Iran - were key to finding a political solution in Syria, but unless they could compromise, it would be "futile" to expect change on the ground.
Why was Iran excluded from the Vienna meeting? Because Saudi Arabia said so, apparently. Saudi Foreign Minister Adel Al-Jubeir said Monday it was difficult to envision a role for Iran in ending the war due to Iran's military role in the conflict. That, of course, makes no sense at all. The other countries the Secretary General named - the US, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Turkey - have a military role in the conflict. That's why they're crucial to a solution. Saudi Arabia doesn't want Iran to participate because Saudi Arabia doesn't want Iran to have a say in the resolution. That's the same as saying that you want to keep the war going.
The notion that the U.S. should defer to the Saudi monarch's insistence on excluding Iran, despite the fact that Iran is almost universally acknowledged to be crucial to a political solution, recalls what President Bill Clinton reportedly said in 1996 after his first meeting with then (and now) Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu:
"Who the f* does he think he is? Who's the f*ing superpower here?"
Why should we take orders on Syria diplomacy from a king who still doesn't allow women to drive? Let's not care what Saudi don't allow - let's talk to Iran anyhow. If you agree with UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and Brookings that Iran should be included in talks to end the war, you can tell President Obama and Congress sohere.

Friday, September 11, 2015

That's Me in the Corner, Losing My Religion






Governor John Kasich (R - OH) worries that the Kentucky spectacle of Christian extremism will turn people away from religion. He is right to worry. I am disgusted by the un-American, hypocritical, mean-spirited rallies and shows of support for...
HUFF.TO

That's Me in the Corner, Losing My Religion



09/09/2015

Governor John Kasich (R - OH) worries that the Kentucky spectacle of Christian extremism will turn people away from religion. He is right to worry. I am disgusted by the un-American, hypocritical, mean-spirited rallies and shows of support for Kim Davis. The whole business besmirches organized religion. Kasich says that when people "see dust-ups like this, my concern is they would go the other way and say, 'Look, I don't want anything to do with that." Lord, I hope so.
Do not get me wrong. I do not oppose personal faith or practice of religion. But Kim Davis' rejection of American law has nothing to do with freedom of religion. Her story is being packaged as a Christian persecution narrative, but nothing is stopping that woman from practicing her religion. Religious freedom laws were instituted originally to protect, say, a Muslim woman who wears a hijab. Kim Davis and her supporters have hijacked "religious freedom" to mean "Christian supremacy." Practicing your religion does not give you free reign to do whatever the hell you want, laws be damned. We live in a diverse country. Assuming your religion trumps our core civil laws is arrogant, ugly, and un-American.
The Kim Davis Crazies are not at all Christ-like. Christ said absolutely nothing about homosexuality, but he did specifically mention prayer: (Matthew 6: 5) "And when you pray, you must not be like the hypocrites; for they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and at the street corners, that they may be seen by men."
Blasting "Eye of the Tiger" at a rally is not what Jesus had in mind.
Jesus had some specific thoughts on divorce, too, but Kim Davis conveniently crossed out that part in her Bible.
These public displays of hatred toward the gays makes me wince every time I pass a church. I realize that not every church harbors these feelings but, at this point, it does not make a difference. The Christian extremists in this country have done a fantastic job of painting the gays as the enemies of religion. I am gay, so I am going to stay as far afield of these people as I can get.
Here are two sides of a sign that popped up yesterday at a church near my home:
2015-09-09-1441804037-2389116-hypocrisy.jpg
All are welcome? Really? C'mon.
I have blocked the name in these photos because I do not want to give the church any free advertising. If I left the name visible, the church would probably claim persecution and, the next thing you know, Christian conservative money would come rolling in. We have seen it happen before. A bakery or a pizza parlor announces it will discriminate against the gays and, miraculously, a million dollars is donated to the "persecuted" business. These "Christians" turn a blind eye to real problems (poverty, abuse, war, etc.) and, instead, throw their energies and money into supporting people who flout the law.
I do not believe in a god. I certainly do not believe in your God. But, you want to hear something ironic? The closest I have ever come to feeling a loving presence that is bigger than myself was at my wedding (my gay wedding, the day I married another man.) When I walked up the aisle and I saw my husband's face and I felt the warmth and surge of love from our family and friends -- that is the moment that I perceived a glimmer of something godlike. Those "Christians" out there want to bar people like me from getting married and having that feeling. They are purposely pushing me away from wanting to know their God. They claim they are motivated by compassion and love and faith and blah blah blah. Sorry, but once the hypocrisy starts emanating from your mouths, I tune you out.
Governor Kasich says that "we have bigger fish to fry in terms of the whole issue of faith." I agree. It would be nice if these "Christians" did more to follow Christ -- you know, feed the hungry, shelter the homeless, that kind of thing -- rather than spending all their time and money to express their virulent hatred toward the gays.



Tuesday, August 18, 2015

Trump's Immigration Jackpot





Trump's Immigration Jackpot



2015-08-17-1439835158-6278560-slot.jpg


After weeks of speculation, Donald Trump finally revealed the details of his proposed border wall . "There won't be any barbed wire or concrete," said Trump. "I'll use 2,000 miles of slot machines."

"How will that stop immigrants from crossing the border?" asked This Reporter.

"You kidding? People will put their last nickel in a slot machine and the Mexican Government will pay for it," Trump announced at the Iowa State Fair.

"Okay, but how will that prevent new immigrants from coming into the country or encourage illegal immigrants who are already here to leave?"

"That's the beauty of it," said Trump, taking a bite out of a deep fried hog-on-a-stick. "There will be no INS raids or police. They will come of their own free will by the millions. I'll fly them in for free and give them coupons for an all-you-can-eat buffet. Have you ever seen a 2,000-foot-long taco?"

"But once all these immigrants are amassed at the border, how do you get them to leave?" asked This Reporter.

"I am going to make a deal with the Mexican government they can't refuse," said Trump. "For every illegal immigrant they take back, I will give them a Donald Trump hat."

"A hat? Why would the Mexican government want a million Trump hats?" asked This Reporter.
"Because the people of Mexico love me. I am HUGE there," said Trump, stepping up to a deep fried macaroni and cheese vendor. "Mmmm. Very tasty."

"How will you decide which immigrants are worthy of citizenship?" This Reporter asked.

"Aha! Glad you asked. That will be the focus of my new reality show Immigrant Apprentice! Each week, viewers will vote to decide who stays and who goes back to the pueblo," said Trump, moving along to deep fried banana cream pie. "They'll get to decide who is a rapist or murderer and who has the makings of a good American citizen."

"How can you possibly win the Republican presidential nomination if you alienate the entire Hispanic population?" asked This Reporter.

"Who said anything about Republicans?" smirked Trump.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stacia-friedman/trumps-immigration-jackpo_b_7999738.html


Thursday, July 9, 2015

Where Does Bernie Sanders Stand on Israeli Settlements in the West Bank?




 
Policy Director, Just Foreign Policy


Where Does Bernie Sanders Stand on Israeli Settlements in the West Bank?

Posted: 


I've gotten a fair bit of correspondence complaining that Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders hasn't said anything recently in support of the human rights of Palestinians.
Of course, Bernie Sanders isn't talking a lot about a lot of things that a lot of progressives wish he would talk more about. He's not talking about cutting the bloated Pentagon budget, though some in the media apparently think that he is.
(My theory for this media behavior is that if Sanders mentions how much we spend on the Pentagon or how the Pentagon wastes our tax dollars, in the context of talking about our crumbling domestic infrastructure, some in the media hear that as a call to cut the Pentagon budget and use the money to rebuild America. Like, if I said, "Those chocolate-chip cookies in the kitchen sure smell delicious," you might think, "Naiman's not just making an aesthetic judgment; he's thinking about eating the cookies.")
Clearly, Sanders has got his message: reduce extreme economic inequality, curb the political power of the billionaire class, address the challenge of climate change -- and he's determined, as much as possible, to "stay on message."
But events happen -- like the austerity/regime change policies that the International Monetary Fund and the European Central Bank have been trying to impose on Greece -- and candidates are expected to talk about events that happen. And in the case of the IMF and Greece, Sanders, unlike the others, did speak up.
On July 2, Hillary Clinton sent a letter to Haim Saban, a major Clinton donor and fundraiser, expressing her "alarm" over the "Boycott, Divestment, and Sanction movement," which she called "a global effort to isolate the state of Israel by ending commercial and academic exchanges." Clinton asserted that "we need to make countering BDS a priority." Crucially, Clinton's letter failed to make any distinction between Israel and Israeli settlements in the West Bank. (Peter Beinart thinks that Clinton was signaling that she will oppose a resolution at the United Nations supporting the two-state solution.)
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee [AIPAC] has been campaigning to erase the distinction in U.S. policy between Israel and Israeli settlements in the West Bank, under the guise of "combatting the global BDS movement." As part of this campaign, AIPAC recently pushed language through Congress that defines the "global BDS" which the U.S. should oppose as including boycott, divestment, and sanctions against enterprises in "Israeli-controlled territories" -- that is, enterprises in Israeli settlements in the West Bank. According to the AIPAC provision, Israel and Israeli settlements in the West Bank are the same thing. J Street and Americans for Peace Now opposed the AIPAC provision.
The Obama administration denounced the AIPAC provision, saying, "by conflating Israel and 'Israeli-controlled territories,' a provision of the Trade Promotion Authority legislation runs counter to longstanding U.S. policy towards the occupied territories, including with regard to settlement activity...The U.S. government has never defended or supported Israeli settlements and activity associated with them and, by extension, does not pursue policies or activities that would legitimize them."
By condemning "BDS" without distinguishing between Israel and Israeli settlements in the West Bank, Clinton is supporting -- whether intentionally or not -- the AIPAC campaign to erase the distinction between Israel and Israeli settlements in the West Bank.
Given that major media coverage of this issue has been virtually non-existent, it seems unlikely that major media will successfully press Hillary to clarify her position on Israeli settlements in the West Bank unless the issue is raised by another candidate.
But another candidate could find that the issue resonates among Democrats. A recent study found that 45 percent of Democratic "opinion leaders" said they would be more likely to vote for a candidate who criticized the Israeli occupation and mistreatment of Palestinians, while only 23 percent said they would be less likely to vote for such a candidate.
Bernie, as the main Democratic challenger to Hillary, seems like a logical address for this concern. If you would like Bernie to say that Israeli settlements in the West Bank are not Israel, you can tell him so here.

Thursday, July 2, 2015

Bravo Bernie! HuffPost: Bernie Sanders Blasts Greece's Creditors


It's about time someone blasted the IMF and others for failed economic policies! 
Austerity does NOT work! 

Bernie Sanders Blasts Greece's Creditors

VIDEO ON LINK

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) attacked the International Monetary Fund and European authorities on Wednesday for imposing what he called excessive austerity measures on Greece in negotiations over the country’s debt payments.
“It is unacceptable that the International Monetary Fund and European policymakers have refused to work with the Greek government on a sensible plan to improve its economy and pay back its debt,” Sanders said in an exclusive statement to The Huffington Post. “At a time of grotesque wealth inequality, the pensions of the people in Greece should not be cut even further to pay back some of the largest banks and wealthiest financiers in the world.”
Sanders, a 2016 Democratic presidential candidate and veteran progressive lawmaker, called the loans-for-austerity policies that the IMF and eurozone nations have imposed on Greece an “abysmal failure,” and demanded that the United States and other world powers grant Greece new debt-repayment terms that would allow its economy to recover from the damage it has sustained since 2008.
“Instead of trying to force the Greek government and its people into even more economic pain and suffering, international leaders throughout the world, including the United States, should enable Greece to enact pro-growth policies that improve the lives of all of its people, not just the wealthy few,” Sanders said.
Sanders appeared to single out the IMF, the creditor over which the United States has the most direct influence. The U.S. controls more votes in IMF decisions than any other nation.
“If Greece’s economy is going to succeed, these austerity policies must end,” Sanders said. “The IMF must give the Greek government the flexibility and time that it needs to grow its economy in a fair way.”
Sanders has for months been urging the United States to use its influence to secure better terms for Greece. In February, when negotiations between Greece and its so-called troika of creditors -- the IMF, the European Central Bank and the European Commission, representing the eurozone nations -- had reached a standstill, Sanders asked the Federal Reserve to leverage its financial support for the ECB during the 2008 crisis to get the central bank to ease up on Greece. At the time, Sanders accusedGreece’s creditors of stiffing Greece’s Syriza-led government in an attempt to bring a friendlier government to power. Syriza, a left-populist party, won national elections in January on the promise that it would secure relief from austerity in negotiations with Greece's creditors.
Sanders’ latest appeal comes at an even more urgent time for Greece, with the country’s membership in the eurozone in greater danger than ever before. On Tuesday, Greece missed a deadline to repay 1.6 billion euros' worth of debt to the IMF. The IMF has said it now considers Greece in arrears, though it will consider the country's request for an extension. Also on Tuesday, the bailout package from Greece’s creditors expired. At the last minute, the Greek government had asked for a new two-year loan from eurozone nations to make the IMF payment, but the other nations refused the request.
Without new rescue loans, Greece will be unable to make upcoming payments to its creditors or even keep its government running. The country's creditors have indicated that Greece could still regain access to needed rescue loans. But on Wednesday, eurozone finance ministers made clear that they will only resume negotiations after Greece holds a July 5 referendum vote on the creditors’ latest bailout proposal.
Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras announced the referendum vote on Saturday after rejecting the creditors’ latest offer. Now he is asking Greek citizens to vote “no” on the referendum, arguing that this will strengthen his hand at the negotiating table. Other European leaders have insisted, however, that a “no” vote will simply amount to a rejection of Greece’s membership in the eurozone, and will close the door on future lending. In the meantime, the ECB has halted its emergency liquidity injections to Greek banks, prompting Greece to institute capital controls that limit bank withdrawals to 60 euros a day.
Sanders is both the first member of Congress and the first presidential candidate to publicly weigh in on the most recent round of negotiations between Greece and its creditors. (The campaigns of Hillary Clinton, Lincoln Chafee and Martin O'Malley, the other three declared Democratic presidential candidates, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.) His statement will likely be hailed as a positive step by the progressive U.S. activists who have been calling on members of Congress to pressure the IMF to offer Greece better terms. As of Wednesday evening, a MoveOn petition initiated by Robert Naiman of the group Just Foreign Policy, asking Congress to “oppose [the] IMF assault on Greek democracy,” had more than 8,000 signatures. The Working Families Party has launched a similar petition campaign.
And the substance of Sanders’ criticism is shared by a broad array of economists who argue that the rapid fiscal tightening imposed on Greece has pushed it into an economic depression and trapped it in an endless cycle of debt. As a condition of two bailouts in the past five years totaling 240 billion euros, Greece’s international creditors have demanded massive spending cuts, tax increases and other reforms. (As of January, only 11 percent of those bailout funds has been used to finance government operations, according to an analysis by the news site MacroPolis. The rest of the funds have gone toward paying or servicing Greece's debts.)
While the austerity regime has allowed Greece to meet short-term obligations to its creditors, it has devastated the country's economy. Greece’s GDP has shrunk by over 25 percent since 2008. Over a quarter of the population is now unemployed, and one-third of Greek citizens are living in poverty. The country’s public debt stands at 177 percent the size of its economy -- a level that is widely believed to be unsustainable.
It's not clear what impact, if any, Sanders’ statement will have on the Greek crisis, since the United States -- notwithstanding its controlling votes at the IMF -- has remained largely on the sidelines during the current impasse. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew has been in close consultation with his eurozone and Greek counterparts throughout negotiations, but he's refrained from specific prescriptions, instead making broad appeals for both sides to compromise. Peter Doyle, a former senior manager at the IMF, criticized the approach in an interview with HuffPost on Wednesday, arguing that the Obama administration should have vetoed a redlined document the creditors presented to Greece on June 26 that was viewed as especially humiliating.
As recently as February, President Barack Obama was arguing that excessive austerity policies can prevent struggling countries from recovering economically.
"You cannot keep on squeezing countries that are in the midst of depression," the president said then, a remark that was widely interpreted as an admonishment to Germany. "At some point, there has to be a growth strategy in order for them to pay off their debts to eliminate some of their deficits."
At a Tuesday press conference, Obama made no such appeals. Instead, he used the occasion to downplay the impact of the Greek crisis on the U.S. economy, calling the threat of a Greek default and eurozone departure an "issue of substantial concern," but one that is "primarily of concern to Europe."
Sanders, for his part, argues that the United States has an interest in helping Greece attain economic relief in order to safeguard the country’s democracy. He cites the rise of Nazism in Germany after World War I as an example of how austerity-stricken economies are susceptible to authoritarian takeovers.
“Let us not forget, after World War I, the Allies imposed oppressive austerity on Germany as part of the Versailles Treaty,” Sanders said in the statement to HuffPost. “As a result, unemployment skyrocketed, the people suffered, and the policies of austerity gave rise to the Nazi Party. We cannot let a situation like that ever happen again.”


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/07/01/bernie-sanders-greece_n_7709322.html