When I was secretary of labor, we cracked down on unsafe and inhumane sweatshops here and abroad by invoking a little-used law that prevented “hot goods” made illegally from being shipped to big retailers. It worked, at least until the George W. Bush administration decided to go easy on the retailers. Lesson: They won’t change their ways until the law threatens their bottom lines. Fast-forward to April 24, when 1,129 people died in a factory collapse at Rana Plaza near Dhaka, Bangladesh. Reports show other factories in Bangladesh are equally dangerous. These factories supply many of the clothes Americans buy from Walmart and the Gap. So what are America’s biggest clothing retailers doing about this? Urging their Bangladeshi suppliers to change their ways. But American retailers are refusing to join with 72 other big clothing retailers from around the world in an “Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh” – that includes factory inspection...s, boycotts of factories that don’t measure up, and safety training for employees – and which is legally binding.
American retailers explain they’re not joining the Accord because they don’t want to be legally bound. “If you have to find $10 million for factory safety and put aside another $10 million for lawyers, you will really start to suck the energy out of this,” says a Walmart executive. Baloney. Court rulings have watered down the Alien Tort Claims Act so much American retailers need not worry about frivolous lawsuits. They’re refusing to join because they don’t want the extra expense of the ongoing inspections and don’t want to have to boycott factories that fail to measure up. The Obama administration should push them to sign up. You and other American shoppers should, too.
When I was secretary of labor, we cracked down on unsafe and inhumane sweatshops here and abroad by invoking a little-used law that prevented “hot goods” made illegally from being shipped to big retailers. It worked, at least until the George W. Bush administration decided to go easy on the retailers. Lesson: They won’t change their ways until the law threatens their bottom lines. Fast-forward to April 24, when 1,129 people died in a factory collapse at Rana Plaza near Dhaka, Bangladesh. Reports show other factories in Bangladesh are equally dangerous. These factories supply many of the clothes Americans buy from Walmart and the Gap. So what are America’s biggest clothing retailers doing about this? Urging their Bangladeshi suppliers to change their ways. But American retailers are refusing to join with 72 other big clothing retailers from around the world in an “Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh” – that includes factory inspection...s, boycotts of factories that don’t measure up, and safety training for employees – and which is legally binding.
American retailers explain they’re not joining the Accord because they don’t want to be legally bound. “If you have to find $10 million for factory safety and put aside another $10 million for lawyers, you will really start to suck the energy out of this,” says a Walmart executive. Baloney. Court rulings have watered down the Alien Tort Claims Act so much American retailers need not worry about frivolous lawsuits. They’re refusing to join because they don’t want the extra expense of the ongoing inspections and don’t want to have to boycott factories that fail to measure up. The Obama administration should push them to sign up. You and other American shoppers should, too.
American retailers explain they’re not joining the Accord because they don’t want to be legally bound. “If you have to find $10 million for factory safety and put aside another $10 million for lawyers, you will really start to suck the energy out of this,” says a Walmart executive. Baloney. Court rulings have watered down the Alien Tort Claims Act so much American retailers need not worry about frivolous lawsuits. They’re refusing to join because they don’t want the extra expense of the ongoing inspections and don’t want to have to boycott factories that fail to measure up. The Obama administration should push them to sign up. You and other American shoppers should, too.
Shared from the page, Living Blue in Missouri. Check them out!
COMMIT TO GETTING 14 NEW PEOPLE REGISTERED TO VOTE BEFORE 2014!!!!
We need to awaken the youth, they can save US,
inform them, ask them to please VOTE!!!!
"Piddling" is what Democracy North Carolina calls the $99,000 fine that's part of the proposed settlement between Duke Energy and North Carolina regulators over toxic water contamination from its coal-fired power plants. The watchdog group also raises concerns about the company's political influence and close ties to Gov. Pat McCrory. The public has 30 days to weigh in.
Watchdog slams Duke Energy's 'sweetheart deal' for NC coal ash contamination
The proposed settlement announced this week between Duke Energy and North Carolina environmental regulators over the utility giant's ongoing contamination of drinking water supplies is drawing fire from a campaign watchdog group, which calls it a "remarkable sweetheart deal anchored with $1 million in campaign contributions."
On Monday, the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) released a proposed consent order with Duke over discharges of coal ash-contaminated wastewater from its Asheville plant in Buncombe County and its Riverbend plant near Charlotte. Groundwater monitoring near the plants showed levels of health-damaging contaminants including boron, manganese and thallium that exceeded regulatory limits. The Asheville plant discharges wastewater to the French Broad River, Lake Julian, and a tributary of Powell Creek, while Riverbend discharges to Mountain Island Lake, a drinking water source for 750,000 people in the Charlotte area.
The proposed consent order requires Duke Energy to take steps to determine the cause and extent of the problem and address unpermitted seeps from its ash ponds. It also imposes an initial fine of $99,111.72, with additional penalties in case of failure to comply with the order. The public has 30 days to comment on the order before it becomes final.
Democracy North Carolina blasted the fine as "piddling" and raised concerns about Gov. Pat McCrory's (R) ties to the utility:
Given Duke's $19.6 billion in 2012 operating revenues, that's the equivalent of fining a person with a $60,000 salary a total of 30 cents.
Under the agreement, Duke receives amnesty for its previous pollution, can continue leaching contaminants into the water, and gets to decide when its research shows that the contamination is significant enough to address. Gov. McCrory is largely turning over his responsibility to protect the public's health to his former employer.
McCrory worked for Duke Energy for nearly 30 years and still holds a significant amount of stock in the Charlotte-based company, the nation's largest electric utility since its recent merger with Progress Energy.
McCrory received over $300,000 in direct campaign contributions for his 2008 and 2012 gubernatorial campaigns from Duke Energy-related donors, according to Democracy North Carolina's analysis. In addition, the Republican Governors Association, which spent over $10 million on ads and other electioneering to support McCrory, received over $760,000 from Duke and Progress. Thought it's difficult to trace the RGA contributions to a specific gubernatorial race, Democracy North Carolina says, "the money obviously helped RGA's ability to spend at such a high level in North Carolina for McCrory's 2008 and 2012 campaigns."
And McCrory is not the only high-ranking North Carolina official who has benefitted from Duke's generosity.
McCrory's assistant secretary at the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), which includes DWQ, is former state House member Mitch Gillespie, whose campaign received $32,000 from Duke and Progress Energy political action committees and another $775 from the companies' employees, former employees and their spouses. N.C. Attorney General Roy Cooper (D) received $37,000 in campaign contributions from Duke and Progress PACs and over $44,000 from employees, former employees and spouses.
In response to the criticism from Democracy North Carolina, DENR Secretary John Skvarla gave a statement to The Charlotte Observer defending the proposed settlement. "The action brought brought by DENR represents the first time in North Carolina's history that an administration has launched a lawsuit to address the problem of unpermitted discharges from coal ash ponds," he told the paper.
DENR's action came following notices of intent to sue filed by the Southern Environmental Law Center under the federal Clean Water Act's citizen enforcement provision. In the case of the Asheville plant, SELC is representing the Sierra Club, Waterkeeper Alliance, and Western North Carolina Alliance, and on the Riverbend case it's representing the Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation. SELC says the groups, which are seeking to intervene in the state's lawsuit, are currently reviewing the terms of the proposed settlement.
Duke Energy and what's now its Progress Energy subsidiary have long wielded enormous political clout in North Carolina. A Democracy North Carolina report from 2007, when the state was under Democratic control, found that the companies' PACs consistently ranked among the most generous.
Written comments on the proposed consent order must be submitted by Aug. 14. Comments by mail should be addressed to the N.C. DENR Division of Water Quality, to the attention of Lisa Palmer, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 or by e-mail to lisa.palmer@ncdenr.gov.
On Monday, the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) released a proposed consent order with Duke over discharges of coal ash-contaminated wastewater from its Asheville plant in Buncombe County and its Riverbend plant near Charlotte. Groundwater monitoring near the plants showed levels of health-damaging contaminants including boron, manganese and thallium that exceeded regulatory limits. The Asheville plant discharges wastewater to the French Broad River, Lake Julian, and a tributary of Powell Creek, while Riverbend discharges to Mountain Island Lake, a drinking water source for 750,000 people in the Charlotte area.
The proposed consent order requires Duke Energy to take steps to determine the cause and extent of the problem and address unpermitted seeps from its ash ponds. It also imposes an initial fine of $99,111.72, with additional penalties in case of failure to comply with the order. The public has 30 days to comment on the order before it becomes final.
Democracy North Carolina blasted the fine as "piddling" and raised concerns about Gov. Pat McCrory's (R) ties to the utility:
Given Duke's $19.6 billion in 2012 operating revenues, that's the equivalent of fining a person with a $60,000 salary a total of 30 cents.McCrory worked for Duke Energy for nearly 30 years and still holds a significant amount of stock in the Charlotte-based company, the nation's largest electric utility since its recent merger with Progress Energy.
Under the agreement, Duke receives amnesty for its previous pollution, can continue leaching contaminants into the water, and gets to decide when its research shows that the contamination is significant enough to address. Gov. McCrory is largely turning over his responsibility to protect the public's health to his former employer.
McCrory received over $300,000 in direct campaign contributions for his 2008 and 2012 gubernatorial campaigns from Duke Energy-related donors, according to Democracy North Carolina's analysis. In addition, the Republican Governors Association, which spent over $10 million on ads and other electioneering to support McCrory, received over $760,000 from Duke and Progress. Thought it's difficult to trace the RGA contributions to a specific gubernatorial race, Democracy North Carolina says, "the money obviously helped RGA's ability to spend at such a high level in North Carolina for McCrory's 2008 and 2012 campaigns."
And McCrory is not the only high-ranking North Carolina official who has benefitted from Duke's generosity.
McCrory's assistant secretary at the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), which includes DWQ, is former state House member Mitch Gillespie, whose campaign received $32,000 from Duke and Progress Energy political action committees and another $775 from the companies' employees, former employees and their spouses. N.C. Attorney General Roy Cooper (D) received $37,000 in campaign contributions from Duke and Progress PACs and over $44,000 from employees, former employees and spouses.
In response to the criticism from Democracy North Carolina, DENR Secretary John Skvarla gave a statement to The Charlotte Observer defending the proposed settlement. "The action brought brought by DENR represents the first time in North Carolina's history that an administration has launched a lawsuit to address the problem of unpermitted discharges from coal ash ponds," he told the paper.
DENR's action came following notices of intent to sue filed by the Southern Environmental Law Center under the federal Clean Water Act's citizen enforcement provision. In the case of the Asheville plant, SELC is representing the Sierra Club, Waterkeeper Alliance, and Western North Carolina Alliance, and on the Riverbend case it's representing the Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation. SELC says the groups, which are seeking to intervene in the state's lawsuit, are currently reviewing the terms of the proposed settlement.
Duke Energy and what's now its Progress Energy subsidiary have long wielded enormous political clout in North Carolina. A Democracy North Carolina report from 2007, when the state was under Democratic control, found that the companies' PACs consistently ranked among the most generous.
Written comments on the proposed consent order must be submitted by Aug. 14. Comments by mail should be addressed to the N.C. DENR Division of Water Quality, to the attention of Lisa Palmer, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 or by e-mail to lisa.palmer@ncdenr.gov.
You have outrage for Trayvon Martin, what about the 54 faceless people who were shot dead during the length of the Zimmerman trial in Chicago? Are you going to make dozens of Facebook posts about them? No? Why? Because the media didn't tell you about their deaths? I see. So you only get your news from it being regurgitated to you from a talking box. How ambitious.
54 People Were Shot Dead In Chicago During The George Zimmerman Trial (INFOGRAPHIC)
Posted: 07/16/2013
54 People Were Shot Dead In Chicago During The George Zimmerman Trial (INFOGRAPHIC)
Posted: 07/16/2013