Jamie Dimon got a 74% RAISE!

If you were paying attention to the numerous posts on this venue, you may recall that after last November's election, I ran into my good friend, Jim, who not only supported Gomez not realizing the archaic, party-line platform he supported, but had no idea what our Massachusetts Senator, Elizabeth Warren is promoting, endorsing, proposing and standing up for.

Let's stop goosestepping into the voting booth.

Risking boring those who have chosen to be informed and have subscribed to the Senator's email list, the posts will continue in order to create an archive of the actions to protect ALL Americans.

It's time to restore necessary protections and disclosures.

JPMorgan Chase recently reached yet another settlement with the U.S. government -- a $13 billion deal with the Department of Justice for peddling deceptive mortgages. The banking giant broke the law, recklessly gambled with our economy, and had to pay a record government settlement. Guess what happened next? You guessed right: JPMorgan's CEO Jamie Dimon just got a 74% raise yesterday. The New York Times speculates that Dimon got the raise because of his "active role" in negotiating government settlements last year. And as Dimon put it himself, it could have been a lot worse if JPMorgan had been forced to go all the way to a trial instead of just settling. So here's my question: If JPMorgan is so happy with their settlements that they are rewarding their CEO with a big raise, do you really think the federal bank regulators were tough enough? There are a lot of steps we can take to push the regulators to do their jobs and hold financial institutions fully accountable when they break the law, and I think a good starting place would be by enacting the Truth in Settlements Act. This is the bill I recently introduced with Senator Coburn that would require accessible, detailed disclosures about settlement agreements so the public can hold regulators accountable -- no more hiding out behind closed doors and keeping the details secret. Sign up now to show your support for the Truth in Settlements Act. When I question federal regulators in Banking Committee hearings, they insist that they don't need to take big banks to trial when they break the law. They stand by their claim that settlement agreements are tough enough. But if a settlement is so weak that Wall Street is celebrating with pay raises, it's not a good deal for the American people. This week Jamie Dimon admitted that the big banks don't want to go to trial, so now there's no doubt: If the regulators were willing to go all the way to a trial, even once in a while, they would have a lot more leverage in the settlement negotiations. And maybe they could get better deals on behalf of consumers and taxpayers. This is simple: Bankers on Wall Street need to be held accountable when they break the law, and regulators in Washington need to be held accountable when they enforce the law. So sign up now to show your support for the Truth in Settlements Act. It's time for real transparency and accountability. Thank you for being a part of this, Elizabeth